scholarly journals The Evolution of Olecranon Fractures and Its Fixation Strategies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan Tan ◽  
Jingwen Ng ◽  
Wei Xiang Ng ◽  
Wei Yuan ◽  
Ernest Beng Kee Kwek
Keyword(s):  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Fracture Prevention ◽  
Fixation Method ◽  
P Value ◽  
Single Fracture ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Secondary Fracture ◽  
Fixation Techniques ◽  
High Index Of Suspicion ◽  
Olecranon Fractures

Abstract Introduction. Olecranon fractures are a common fracture of the upper extremity. The primary aim was to investigate the evolution of olecranon fractures and fixation method over a period of 12 years. The secondary aim was to compare complication rates of Tension Band Wiring (TBW) and Plate Fixation (PF). Materials and Methods Retrospective Study for all patients with surgically treated olecranon fractures from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2016 from a tertiary trauma center. Records review for demographic, injury characteristics, radiographic classification and configuration, implant choices and complications. Results grouped into three 4-year intervals, analyzed comparatively to establish significant trends over 12 years. Results 262 patients were identified. Demographically, increasing mean age (48.7 to 58.9 years old, p-value 0.004) and higher ASA scores (7.1% ASA 3 to 21.0% ASA 3 p-value 0.001). Later fractures were more oblique (fracture angle 86.1 to 100.0 degrees, p-value 0.001) and comminuted (Schatzker D type 10.4–30.0%, p-value 0.025, single fracture line 94.0–66.0%, p-value 0.001). Implant choice, sharp increase in PF compared to TBW (PF 16.0% to PF 80.2%, p-value 0.001). Complication-wise, TBW had higher rates of symptomatic implant, implant and bony failures and implant removal. Conclusion Demographic and fracture characteristic trends suggest that olecranon fractures are exhibiting fragility fracture characteristics (older age, higher ASA scores, more unstable, oblique and comminuted olecranon fractures). Having a high index of suspicion would alert surgeons to consider use of advanced imaging, utilize appropriate fixation techniques and manage the underlying osteoporosis for secondary fracture prevention. Despite this, trends suggest a potential overutilization of PF particularly for stable fracture patterns and the necessary precaution should be exercised.

Geriatric olecranon fractures treated with plate fixation have low complication rates

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 353-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean T. Campbell ◽  
Malcolm R. DeBaun ◽  
L. Henry Goodnough ◽  
Julius A. Bishop ◽  
Michael J. Gardner
Keyword(s):  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Olecranon Fractures

Simple and comminuted displaced olecranon fractures: a clinical comparison between tension band wiring and plate fixation techniques

2014 ◽  
Vol 134 (8) ◽  
pp. 1107-1114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Tarallo ◽  
Raffaele Mugnai ◽  
Roberto Adani ◽  
Francesco Capra ◽  
Francesco Zambianchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Tension Band ◽  
Tension Band Wiring ◽  
Clinical Comparison ◽  
Fixation Techniques ◽  
Olecranon Fractures

A novel plating technique for Ideberg type 1 A glenoid fractures: a report of five patients

2021 ◽  
pp. 175857322110018
Author(s):  
Sinan Oguzkaya ◽  
Jacobien van der Wijk ◽  
Alexander van Tongel ◽  
Joris Beckers ◽  
Tom van Isacker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Reduction ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Fixation Method ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Constant Murley Score ◽  
Uninjured Side ◽  
The Mean

Background Glenoid rim fractures are uncommon and generally associated with high complication rates. The most common treatment techniques include screw or anchor fixation. Here, we introduce a new fixation method to treat Ideberg type 1 A fractures. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on patients treated with open reduction and plate fixation for Ideberg type 1 A fractures. The active range of motion capacity of both shoulders was recorded postoperatively. Constant-Murley score and Oxford disability index scores were used as outcome tools. Results Five patients (three men and two women) were evaluated; their mean age was 56 years (standard deviation (SD), 10 years). The mean follow-up period was 25 months (range, 6–69 months); all fractures healed radiologically during the follow-up period. The mean Constant-Murley score was 80.36 (SD 11.01); the mean Oxford disability index was 37 (SD 9). The subsequent flexion and external rotation of the injured shoulders were similar to those of the uninjured side (injured vs. uninjured side: flexion, 176 ± 5.4 vs. 178 ± 4.4; external rotation, 48 ± 10.9 vs. 60 ± 0). No patient showed signs of osteoarthritis, stiffness, instability, or chronic pain at the last follow-up. Discussion Open reduction and internal fixation with a plate is suitable for Ideberg type 1A glenoid fractures.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Four-Point Suture Fixated And Two-Point Sutureless Posterior Chamber IOLs Combined With Pars Plana Vitrectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariya Zyablitskaya ◽  
Estee Hong ◽  
Royce W.S. Chen ◽  
Stanley Chang ◽  
Leejee H. Suh
Keyword(s):  
Strong Evidence ◽  
Pars Plana Vitrectomy ◽  
Cataract Extraction ◽  
Fixation Method ◽  
Posterior Chamber ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Iol Implantation ◽  
Scleral Fixation ◽  
Fixation Techniques ◽  
Pars Plana

Abstract Background: While each scleral fixation method has its own advantages, there is a lack of strong evidence to suggest a superior technique. Advances in cataract surgery expand patient eligibility for successful cataract extraction, benefitting a growing population of pseudophakic patients. However, implantation of secondary intraocular lens (IOL) with compromised anterior or posterior capsule is a more challenging task. Each method of scleral fixation has its own advantages and none of them has strong evidence to be superior. This paper describes postsurgical outcomes of two scleral intraocular(IOL) fixation techniques combined with pars plana vitrectomy(PPV) from a single tertiary referral eye center.Methods: Patients underwent PPV and IOL implantation with either four-point sutured scleral fixation (Akreos AO60(AK); n=24) or two-point sutureless flanged intrascleral fixation (CT Lucia(CTL); n=7). Reports include IOL and sclerotomy placement, fixation techniques, and IOL model. Results: 31 eyes of 30 patients were analyzed. Average change in vision from baseline measurement was LogMAR -0.68±0.66 and -0.90 ±0.63 for AK and CTL groups, respectively. Average postoperative refractive error was -0.3 ±1.03 D (AK) and 0.4 ±0.60 D (CTL). No opacification cases of Akreos lens were found in this study with the longest follow up of 53 months.Conclusions: Both methods of implantation (sutured and sutureless) could provide good visual and refractive outcomes. Minimal complication rates were reported despite including patients with multiple comorbidities, making both techniques an attractive choice for secondary IOL implantation.

scholarly journals Low-Energy Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Care Conundrum

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215145932098540
Author(s):  
Bailey R. Abernathy ◽  
Lisa K. Schroder ◽  
Deborah C. Bohn ◽  
Julie A. Switzer
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Pelvic Ring ◽  
Fracture Prevention ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Care Pathways ◽  
Secondary Fracture ◽  
Secondary Fracture Prevention ◽  
Pelvic Ring Fractures ◽  
Rehabilitative Care

Introduction: A need exists for improved care pathways for patients experiencing low-energy pelvic ring fractures. A review of the current literature was performed to understand the typical patient care and post-acute rehabilitation pathway within the US healthcare system. We also sought to summarize reported clinical outcomes worldwide. Significance: Low-energy pelvic ring fracture patients usually do not qualify for inpatient admission, yet they often require post-acute rehabilitative care. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) 3-day rule is a barrier to obtaining financial coverage of this rehabilitative care. Results: Direct admission of some patients to post-acute care facilities has shown promise with decreased cost, improved patient outcomes, and increased patient satisfaction. Secondary fracture prevention programs may also improve outcomes for this patient population. Conclusions: Post-acute care innovation and secondary fracture prevention should be prioritized in the low-energy pelvic fragility fracture patient population. To demonstrate the effect and feasibility of these improved care pathways, further studies are necessary.

scholarly journals Developing a model Fracture Liaison Service consultation with patients, carers and clinicians: a Delphi survey to inform content of the iFraP complex consultation intervention

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurna Bullock ◽  
Fay Crawford-Manning ◽  
Elizabeth Cottrell ◽  
Jane Fleming ◽  
Sarah Leyland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Fracture Prevention ◽  
Fracture Liaison Service ◽  
Delphi Survey ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Secondary Fracture ◽  
Drug Treatments ◽  
Fracture Liaison

Abstract Summary Fracture Liaison Services are recommended to deliver best practice in secondary fracture prevention. This modified Delphi survey, as part of the iFraP (Improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug Treatments) study, provides consensus regarding tasks for clinicians in a model Fracture Liaison Service consultation. Purpose The clinical consultation is of pivotal importance in addressing barriers to treatment adherence. The aim of this study was to agree to the content of the ‘model Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) consultation’ within the iFraP (Improving uptake of Fracture Prevention drug Treatments) study. Methods A Delphi survey was co-designed with patients and clinical stakeholders using an evidence synthesis of current guidelines and content from frameworks and theories of shared decision-making, communication and medicine adherence. Patients with osteoporosis and/or fragility fractures, their carers, FLS clinicians and osteoporosis specialists were sent three rounds of the Delphi survey. Participants were presented with potential consultation content and asked to rate their perception of the importance of each statement on a 5-point Likert scale and to suggest new statements (Round 1). Lowest rated statements were removed or amended after Rounds 1 and 2. In Round 3, participants were asked whether each statement was ‘essential’ and percentage agreement calculated; the study team subsequently determined the threshold for essential content. Results Seventy-two, 49 and 52 patients, carers and clinicians responded to Rounds 1, 2 and 3 respectively. One hundred twenty-two statements were considered. By Round 3, consensus was reached, with 81 statements deemed essential within FLS consultations, relating to greeting/introductions; gathering information; considering therapeutic options; eliciting patient perceptions; establishing shared decision-making preferences; sharing information about osteoporosis and treatments; checking understanding/summarising; and signposting next steps. Conclusions This Delphi consensus exercise has summarised for the first time patient/carer and clinician consensus regarding clearly defined tasks for clinicians in a model FLS consultation.

145 Outcomes of Unstable Distal Radius Fractures – A Meta-Analysis of Bridging External Fixation Versus Volar Plating

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Mulrain ◽  
K Joshi ◽  
F Doyle ◽  
A Abdulkarim
Keyword(s):  
External Fixation ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Volar Plating ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Introduction Distal radius fractures are common and trends for fixation have changed with increased use of volar locking plates in recent time. A meta-analysis will summarise the best evidence for treatment. Method A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA methodology to identify studies that reported clinical and/or radiological outcomes in patients with AO type C distal radius fractures when treated with external fixation versus ORIF. Results 10 randomised trials were included in this review, reporting on 967 patients. Clinical outcomes are in favour of volar plating at 3 months post-operation, but no difference between the two groups is seen at 6 or 12 months. Analysis of complication rates shows a minute increase in risk-ratio for volar plating versus external fixation. Subgroup analysis showed significantly higher re-operations after plate fixation and significantly higher infection after external fixation. Conclusions Internal fixation of complex distal radius fractures confers an improved clinical outcome at early follow up only and a minimally increased risk of complications. The improved grip strength with volar plating is only superior at early follow up and no long-term superiority is seen with either intervention. The type of surgery in this injury type therefore remains at the surgeon’s consideration on a case-by-case basis.

scholarly journals Secondary Fracture Prevention

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-161
Author(s):  
Robert B. Conley ◽  
Gemma Adib ◽  
Robert A. Adler ◽  
Kristina E. Åkesson ◽  
Ivy M. Alexander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Prevention ◽  
Secondary Fracture ◽  
Secondary Fracture Prevention

scholarly journals Lateral Ankle Instability Surgical Treatment

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0003
Author(s):  
Bahman Sahranavard ◽  
Cesar de Cesar Netto ◽  
Ashish Shah ◽  
Parke Hudson ◽  
Ibukunoluwa Araoye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Ankle Instability ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
P Value ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Lateral Ankle ◽  
Lateral Ankle Instability

Category: Ankle, Sports Introduction/Purpose: Lateral ankle instability is a common cause of disability in the active population. Although the majority of patients can be treated conservatively, surgical repair of the ligaments, with or without reinforcement, represents an excellent option for refractory cases. Failed primary surgical repair, recurrence of the ankle instability and need for revision surgery can rarely happen and is probably affected by multiple variables. That includes patient’s characteristics such as BMI and comorbidities and surgical aspects such as the use of suture anchors and soft-tissue reinforcement. The purpose of this study was to compare patient’s characteristics and complication rates of primary repair and revision procedures. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 231 patients (160 Female, 71 Male) who underwent surgical treatment for lateral ankle instability between 2010-2016. Thirty-two were revision cases (14.2%), including 24 females and 8 males, and 199 were primary direct repairs (85.8%). The mean age at the time of the surgery was 39 (19-65)years, and average follow-up was 9 (2-55) months. The procedures were performed by four different surgeons. All cases were reviewed based on age, gender, BMI, procedure type and number of incisions, comorbidities, and complications. Data found was compared between the two groups (primary repair and revision surgery) by T-test. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The Brostrom-Gould procedure was used in 69.5% of the primary repairs and 63.6% of the revision cases. The use of suture anchors was also similar in both groups (51%). Repair of the calcaneofibular ligament was performed in 68% of primary repairs and 81.8% of the revisions. We didn’t find significant differences regarding comorbidities between two groups: smoking (23.4% x 27.2%, p-value 0.371); diabetes (6.8% x 6%, p-value 0.951) and body mass index above 30 (28.5% x 24.2%, p-value 0.347). We found significant difference in the complication rate of the procedures, with a higher incidence in the revision group (48.4%) when compared to the primary repair group (24%). That included: sural neuritis (15.1% x 3.4%), superficial peroneal neuritis (12.1% x 4.5%), skin problems (9% x 7.4%). Conclusion: Our study of 231 patients that underwent surgical treatment for lateral ankle instability found significant higher incidence of complications in patients who had revision procedures when compared to primary repair. No differences regarding smoking status, diabetes and BMI were found.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document