scholarly journals Proton pump inhibitors may reduce the efficacy of ribociclib and palbociclib in metastatic breast cancer patients

Author(s):  
KADİR ESER ◽  
ARİF HAKAN ÖNDER ◽  
EMEL SEZER ◽  
TİMUÇİN ÇİL ◽  
ALİ İNAL ◽  
...  

Abstract IntroductionApproximately 20-33% of all cancer patients are treated with acid reducing agents (ARAs), most commonly proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), to reduce gastro esophageal reflux disease symptoms. Palbociclib and ribociclib are weak base so their solubility depends on different pH. The solubility of palbociclib dramatically decreases to <0.5 mg/ml when pH is above 4,5 but ribociclibs’ solubility decreases when pH increases above 6,5. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the effects of concurrent PPIs on palbociclib and ribociclib efficacy in terms of progression free survival in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients.Patients and methodsWe enrolled hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative mBC patients treated with endocrine treatment (Letrozole or fulvestrant) combined palbociclib or ribociclib alone or with PPI accompanying our observational study. During palbociclib/ribociclib therapy, patients should be treated with "concurrent PPIs" defined as all or more than half of treatment with palbociclib/ribociclib, if no PPI was applied, it was defined as 'no concurrent PPI', those who used PPI but less than half were excluded from the study. All data collected from real life retrospectively.ResultsOur study included 217 patients, 105 of whom received palbociclib and 112 received ribociclib treatment. Of 105 patients who received Palbociclib, 65 were on concomitant PPI therapy, 40 were not. Of the 112 patients who received ribociclib, 61 were on concomitant PPI therapy, 51 were not. In the palbociclib group, the PFS of the patients using PPI was shorter than the PFS of the patients not using (13.04 months vs. unreachable, p<0.0001). it was determined that taking PPI was an independent predictor of shortening PFS (p<0.001) in the multivariate analysis, In the ribociclib group, the PFS of the patients using PPI was shorter than the PFS of the patients not using (12.64 months vs. unreachable, p=0.003). It was determined that taking PPI was single statistically independent predictor of shortening PFS (p=0.003, univariate analysis).ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that concomitant usage of PPIs was associated with shorter PFS in mBC treated with both ribociclib and especially palbociclib. If it needs to be used, PPI selection should be made carefully and low-strength PPI or other ARAs (eg H2 antagonists, antacids) should be preferred.

2019 ◽  
Vol 145 (12) ◽  
pp. 3359-3369 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Jacot ◽  
Pierre‐Etienne Heudel ◽  
Julien Fraisse ◽  
Sophie Gourgou ◽  
Séverine Guiu ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13017-13017
Author(s):  
T. Saeki ◽  
A. Okita ◽  
K. Aogi ◽  
T. Kakishita ◽  
R. Okita ◽  
...  

13017 Background: The mechanism of paclitaxel (PXL) resistance has been investigated. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) on cell membrane could be an important target for improving efficacy of PXL. Toremifene (TOR) may moderate P-gp-related drug resistance in vitro. To determine safety and efficacy of PXL and TOR, we conducted a pharmacokinetic study for a combination chemo-endocrine treatment of PXL plus TOR for metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Patients with metastatic breast cancer, who were previously treated with a standard chemotherapy without PXL, were eligible. Patients received PXL 80 mg/m2(i.v.) weekly on days 1, 8, and 15 in a cycle. Concurrently, toremifene 120mg/body (p.o.) was given dairy from day 1–28 in a cycle. For pharmacokinetic study, single agent of PXL was initially administrated on day 1, 8, and 15. From day 18, TOR 120mg/body was given dairy. On day 22, PXL administration in second cycle was skipped. On day 32, blood samples were collected from the patients received PXL 80 mg/m2 + TOR 120 mg/day/body. Samples were analyzed by HPLC (Unisil Q 5CN). Response was evaluated by WHO criteria and adverse events were evaluated by NCI•CTC Ver.2. Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled. Out of 19, 15 patients had measurable disease, and 1 partial response, 8 stable disease, and 6 progressive disease were observed. The addition of TOR caused in no specific adverse events more than grade 3 and toxic profile in combination was similar that in PXL monotherapy. Pharmacokinetic profile of PXL was similar with/without TOR. In addition, Cmax of TOR was 1.85±0.71 mg/mL. Tmax was 2.9±1.8 hr were observed. AUC0–8 of TOR was not affected in the presence of PXL. AUC0- 8 of TOR-1, metabolite of TOR, also demonstrated the similar pharmacokinetic profile. Pharmacokinetic parameters of PXL did not reveal intra-patient variability in previously treated metastatic breast cancer patients. Conclusions: Pharmacokinetic profile in a combination of PXL and TOR was similar that in PXL monotherapy. The addition of TOR to PXL for previously treated metastatic breast cancer patients might be safety. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document