scholarly journals Assessing the Endocrine Disrupting Effects of Chemicals on Invertebrates in the European Union

Author(s):  
Mark Crane ◽  
Steve Dungey ◽  
Adam Lillicrap ◽  
Helen Thompson ◽  
Lennart Weltje ◽  
...  

Abstract Evidence from both laboratory and field studies has shown that currently used synthetic and naturally occurring chemical substances may potentially disrupt invertebrate endocrine systems, although the extent of this in field populations remains unclear. Translating concerns about potential endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) into practical and effective regulatory action is currently hampered by the breadth of invertebrate endocrinology when compared to the better understood vertebrate systems, a lack of fundamental knowledge about the endocrinology of many invertebrate groups, and the resulting uncertainty when making regulatory decisions. This paper i) outlines the breadth of invertebrate endocrine pathways for which European Union regulation of potential EDCs may be relevant, ii) reviews the extent to which current knowledge meets regulatory requirements for invertebrates, including an assessment of the suitability of current invertebrate test guidelines for detecting endocrine modes of action; and iii) proposes a roadmap towards the regulation of potential EDCs with greater confidence, based on the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) concept and a focus on identifying Molecular Initiating Events (MIEs) within AOPs. We propose that the most important research need is compilation of a comprehensive list of endocrine-related MIEs across invertebrate taxa via use of high throughput ‘omics in combination with bioinformatics reverse engineered analyses. Although tractable, such an approach would require significant resource investment for development and implementation.

2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 1278-1288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliette Legler ◽  
Tony Fletcher ◽  
Eva Govarts ◽  
Miquel Porta ◽  
Bruce Blumberg ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Geoffrey C. Kabat

In the early 1990s concern emerged that hormonal compounds present in small amounts in food and water – “environmental estrogens” -- could be having subtle effects on human health and wildlife. This concern led to the formulation of the “endocrine-disruption hypothesis,” which has received widespread attention. Over twenty years of research have shown that environmental exposures to these substances is generally minute and are dwarfed by hormonal (phytoestrogenic) compounds in food, as well as by hormone therapy used by some women. Nevertheless, the issue of “endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the environment” is currently under debate within the European Union and elsewhere.


2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 1245-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo Trasande ◽  
R. Thomas Zoeller ◽  
Ulla Hass ◽  
Andreas Kortenkamp ◽  
Philippe Grandjean ◽  
...  

Andrology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 565-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Trasande ◽  
R. T. Zoeller ◽  
U. Hass ◽  
A. Kortenkamp ◽  
P. Grandjean ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 1256-1266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martine Bellanger ◽  
Barbara Demeneix ◽  
Philippe Grandjean ◽  
R. Thomas Zoeller ◽  
Leonardo Trasande

2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-105
Author(s):  
Lucija Perharič ◽  
Tanja Fatur ◽  
Jernej Drofenik

AbstractIn view of the European Union regulations 1107/2009 and 528/2012, which say that basic substances in plant protection and biocidal products marketed in the European Union (EU) should not have an inherent capacity to cause endocrine disruption, an initiative was started to define scientific criteria for the identification of endocrine disruptors (EDs). The objectives of the EU strategy on EDs are to protect human health and the environment, to assure the functioning of the market, and to provide clear and coherent criteria for the identification of EDs that could have broad application in the EU legislation. Policy issues were to be addressed by the Ad-hoc group of Commission Services, EU Agencies and Member States established in 2010, whereas the scientific issues were to be addressed by the Endocrine Disruptors Expert Advisory Group (ED EAG), established in 2011. The ED EAG adopted the 2002 World Health Organization (WHO) definition of endocrine disruptor and agreed that for its identification it is necessary to produce convincing evidence of a biologically plausible causal link between an adverse effect and endocrine disrupting mode of action. In 2014, the European Commission proposed four ED identification criteria options and three regulatory options, which are now being assessed for socio-economic, environmental, and health impact. Slovenia supports the establishing of identification criteria and favours option 4, according to which ED identification should be based on the WHO definition with the addition of potency as an element of hazard characterisation. As for regulatory options, Slovenia favours the risk-based rather than hazard-based regulation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 1267-1277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russ Hauser ◽  
Niels E. Skakkebaek ◽  
Ulla Hass ◽  
Jorma Toppari ◽  
Anders Juul ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document