scholarly journals Gains and Losses in Life Expectancy with Care Needs from the Elimination of Diseases in Japan

Author(s):  
Miyuki Kawado ◽  
Shuji Hashimoto ◽  
Hiroya Yamada ◽  
Rumi Seko ◽  
Toshiyuki Ojima ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Evaluating the impact of diseases on expected years of life with care needs is important in older populations. We examined gains or losses in expected years with care needs at age 65 years in Japan.Methods: We used Japanese national health statistics data, including care needs, based on long-term care insurance. The number of expected years with and without care needs at age 65 years, after the elimination of five selected diseases in 2010, 2013, and 2016 were calculated using a proposed method.Results: Expected years without care needs at age 65 years increased from 17.15 years in 2010 to 17.82 years in 2016 for men and from 20.24 to 20.74 years for women; expected years with care needs were between 1.70 and 1.73 years for men and between 3.59 and 3.66 years for women. Elimination of malignant neoplasms and heart diseases led to gains in expected years with and without care needs. Elimination of cerebrovascular diseases, arthropathies, and dementia showed gains in expected years without care needs and losses in expected years with care needs. Gains and losses from elimination of dementia expanded each year but those from elimination of other diseases compressed.Conclusions: Our results suggest that the prevention of dementia, cerebrovascular diseases, and arthropathies lead to more expected years without care needs and fewer expected years with care needs. The impact of dementia might increase and that of other diseases might decrease each year.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 176-176
Author(s):  
Hiroto Yoshida ◽  
Yuriko Kihara

Abstract This study examined the impact of frailty on medical and long-term care expenditures in an older Japanese population. The subjects were those aged 75 years and over who responded to the survey (March 2018) in Bibai, Hokkaido, Japan (n=1,203) and have never received certification of long-term care insurance at the survey. We followed up 867 individuals (72.1%) until the end of December 2018 (10 month-period). We defined frailty as a state in performing 4 items and over of 15 items which were composed of un-intentional weight loss, history of falls, etc. Among 867 subjects, 233 subjects (26.9%) were judged to be frailty group, and 634 subjects (73.1%) non-frailty group. We compared period to the new certification of long-term care insurance (LTCI), accumulated medical and long-term care expenditures adjusted for age and gender between the two groups during the follow-up period. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association between baseline frailty and the new certification of LTCI. The relative hazard ratio (HR) was higher in frailty group than non-frailty group (HR=3.51, 95% CI:1.30-9.45, P=.013). The adjusted mean accumulated medical and long-term care expenditures per capita during the follow-up were significantly (P=.002) larger for those in the frailty group (629,699 yen), while those in the non-frailty group were 450,995 yen. We confirmed strong economic impact of frailty in the elderly aged 75 or over in Japan.


2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 238-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rumi Seko ◽  
Shuji Hashimoto ◽  
Miyuki Kawado ◽  
Yoshitaka Murakami ◽  
Masayuki Hayashi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jialan Wu ◽  
Siman Chen ◽  
Huangliang Wen ◽  
Yayan Yi ◽  
Xiaoyan Liao

Abstract Background Chinese government launched a pilot study on public long-term care insurance (LTCI) recently. Guangzhou is one of the fifteen pilot cities, officially started providing LTCI in August 2017. An in-depth analysis of experimental data from the pilot city may provide suggestions for developing a fair and effective LTCI system. This study aimed to evaluate the LTCI pilot by exploring the characteristics and care needs of claimants, and performance of the assessment tool. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study in which claims data between July 2018 and March 2019 in the Guangzhou pilot was analyzed. LTCI claimants during the study period were included. The care needs were determined based on claimants’ physical function assessed by the Barthel Index and their medical conditions. Rasch analysis was used to explore the performance of the Barthel Index. Results Among 4810 claimants included, 4582 (95.3%) obtained LTCI benefits. Of these beneficiaries, 4357 (95.1%) were ≧ 60 years old, and 791 (17.3%) had dementia. Among 228 (4.7%) unsuccessful claimants, 22 (0.5%) had dementia. The prevalence of stroke was high in beneficiaries with (38.1%) or without dementia (56.6%), as well as in unsuccessful claimants with (40.9%) or without dementia (52.4%). Beneficiaries without dementia needed more support for basic activities of daily living and nursing care than those with dementia, while beneficiaries with dementia were more likely to be institutionalized. Five (22.7%) unsuccessful claimants with dementia and 48 (23.3%) unsuccessful claimants without dementia were disabled in at least two basic self-care activities. Regarding Barthel Index, Rasch analysis showed threshold disordering in “mobility” and “climbing stairs”, and the narrow interval was observed between all the adjacent categories of the ten items (< 1.4 logits). Conclusions Stroke and dementia were two common reasons for needing long-term care in LTCI claimants. The Barthel Index is not suitable for assessing and dividing LTCI claimants, because of inappropriate items and narrow category responses. A comprehensive assessment and grading system is required, together with needs-led care services. The eligibility should be expanded gradually based on balance finance solutions.


Author(s):  
Sunhee Park ◽  
Heejung Kim ◽  
Chang Gi Park

Abstract Background South Korea established universal long-term care insurance (LTCI) in 2008. However, actual requests for LTCI remain lower than government estimates because some eligible candidates never apply despite their strong care needs. This study aimed to examine factors affecting LTCI applications for older, community-dwelling Koreans. Methods Both individual- and community-level data were obtained from a national dataset from the Korea Health Panel Survey and the Korea National Statistical Office (N = 523). Data were analyzed using multilevel modeling. Results Only 16.4% of older adults in need of care applied for LTCI. Those who applied were more likely to be older, report poor self-rated health, receive care from non-family caregivers, and have caregivers experiencing high levels of caregiving burden. Regional differences in LTCI applications existed concerning the financial condition of one’s community. Conclusions Our study findings emphasize that Korean LTCI should implement both individual and community strategies to better assist older adults in properly acquiring LTCI. The government should make comprehensive efforts to increase access to LTCI in terms of availability, quality, cost, and information by collaborating with local centers.


2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1612-1631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian E. McGarry ◽  
Helena Temkin-Greener ◽  
Benjamin P. Chapman ◽  
David C. Grabowski ◽  
Yue Li

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document