scholarly journals Identification of Long Noncoding RNAs in Distinct Subtypes of Mouse Retinal Ganglion Cells 

Author(s):  
Ana Ayupe ◽  
Felipe Beckedorff ◽  
Konstantin Levay ◽  
Ramin Shiekhattar ◽  
Kevin Park

Abstract Background: Emerging evidence indicates that long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are important regulators of various biological processes, and their expression can be altered following certain pathological conditions, including central nervous system injury. Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), whose axons form the optic nerve, are a heterogeneous population of neurons with more than 20 molecularly distinct subtypes. While most RGCs, including the ON-OFF direction-selective RGCs (ooDSGCs), are vulnerable to axonal injury, a small population of RGCs, including the intrinsically photosensitive RGCs (ipRGCs), are more resilient. Results: By performing systematic analyses on RNA-sequencing data, here we identify lncRNAs that are expressed in ooDSGCs and ipRGCs with and without axonal injury. Our results reveal a repertoire of different classes of lncRNAs, including long intergenic noncoding RNAs and antisense ncRNAs that are differentially expressed between these RGC types. Strikingly, we also found dozens of lncRNAs whose expressions are altered markedly in response to axonal injury, some of which are expressed exclusively in either one of the subtypes. Moreover, analyses into these lncRNAs unraveled their neighboring coding genes, many of which encode transcription factors and signaling molecules, suggesting that these lncRNAs may act in cis to regulate important biological processes in these neurons. Lastly, guilt-by-association analysis showed that lncRNAs are correlated with apoptosis associated genes, suggesting potential roles for these lncRNAs in RGC survival.Conclusions: Overall, the results of this study reveal RGC type-specific expression of lncRNAs and provide a foundation for future investigation of the function of lncRNAs in regulating neuronal type specification and survival.

BMC Genomics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana C. Ayupe ◽  
Felipe Beckedorff ◽  
Konstantin Levay ◽  
Benito Yon ◽  
Yadira Salgueiro ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Emerging evidence indicates that long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are important regulators of various biological processes, and their expression can be altered following certain pathological conditions, including central nervous system injury. Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), whose axons form the optic nerve, are a heterogeneous population of neurons with more than 40 molecularly distinct subtypes in mouse. While most RGCs, including the ON-OFF direction-selective RGCs (ooDSGCs), are vulnerable to axonal injury, a small population of RGCs, including the intrinsically photosensitive RGCs (ipRGCs), are more resilient. Results By performing systematic analyses on RNA-sequencing data, here we identify lncRNAs that are expressed in ooDSGCs and ipRGCs with and without axonal injury. Our results reveal a repertoire of different classes of lncRNAs, including long intergenic noncoding RNAs and antisense ncRNAs that are differentially expressed between these RGC types. Strikingly, we also found dozens of lncRNAs whose expressions are altered markedly in response to axonal injury, some of which are expressed exclusively in either one of the types. Moreover, analyses into these lncRNAs unraveled their neighboring coding genes, many of which encode transcription factors and signaling molecules, suggesting that these lncRNAs may act in cis to regulate important biological processes in these neurons. Lastly, guilt-by-association analysis showed that lncRNAs are correlated with apoptosis associated genes, suggesting potential roles for these lncRNAs in RGC survival. Conclusions Overall, the results of this study reveal RGC type-specific expression of lncRNAs and provide a foundation for future investigation of the function of lncRNAs in regulating neuronal type specification and survival.


2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (13) ◽  
pp. 8019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Yokota ◽  
Yuji Takihara ◽  
Shogo Arimura ◽  
Seiji Miyake ◽  
Yoshihiro Takamura ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth M. Simpson ◽  
Andrea J. Korecki ◽  
Oriol Fornes ◽  
Trevor J. McGill ◽  
Jorge Luis Cueva-Vargas ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 1114-1123
Author(s):  
Kota Sato ◽  
Yurika Nakagawa ◽  
Kazuko Omodaka ◽  
Hiroyuki Asada ◽  
Shinobu Fujii ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 1547-1581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Tri Hoang Do ◽  
King-Wai Yau

Life on earth is subject to alternating cycles of day and night imposed by the rotation of the earth. Consequently, living things have evolved photodetective systems to synchronize their physiology and behavior with the external light-dark cycle. This form of photodetection is unlike the familiar “image vision,” in that the basic information is light or darkness over time, independent of spatial patterns. “Nonimage” vision is probably far more ancient than image vision and is widespread in living species. For mammals, it has long been assumed that the photoreceptors for nonimage vision are also the textbook rods and cones. However, recent years have witnessed the discovery of a small population of retinal ganglion cells in the mammalian eye that express a unique visual pigment called melanopsin. These ganglion cells are intrinsically photosensitive and drive a variety of nonimage visual functions. In addition to being photoreceptors themselves, they also constitute the major conduit for rod and cone signals to the brain for nonimage visual functions such as circadian photoentrainment and the pupillary light reflex. Here we review what is known about these novel mammalian photoreceptors.


2014 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 108-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly A. Fernandes ◽  
Jeffrey M. Harder ◽  
Simon W. John ◽  
Peter Shrager ◽  
Richard T. Libby

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Beyeler

AbstractVisual prostheses aim to restore vision to people blinded from degenerative photoreceptor diseases by electrically stimulating surviving neurons in the retina. However, a major challenge with epiretinal prostheses is that they may accidentally activate passing axon fibers, causing severe perceptual distortions. To investigate the effect of axonal stimulation on the retinal response, we developed a computational model of a small population of morphologically and biophysically detailed retinal ganglion cells, and simulated their response to epiretinal electrical stimulation. We found that activation thresholds of ganglion cell somas and axons varied systematically with both stimulus pulse duration and electrode-retina distance. These findings have important implications for the improvement of stimulus encoding methods for epiretinal prostheses.


Gene Therapy ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
J M K Kwong ◽  
L Gu ◽  
N Nassiri ◽  
V Bekerman ◽  
R Kumar-Singh ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 112 ◽  
pp. 106-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly A. Fernandes ◽  
Jeffrey M. Harder ◽  
Jessica Kim ◽  
Richard T. Libby

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document