Clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients

Abstract Background: Although: percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is increasingly being used to treat lumbar degenerative disease, the treatment of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) involves considerable uncertainty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of PELD for the treatment of LSSin elderly patients aged 65 years or older. Methods: In this retrospective review, 136 patients aged 65 years or older who underwent PELD to treat LSS were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups, group A (age 65-74) and group B (age ≥ 75), and perioperative data were analyzed. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and MacNab classification were used to evaluate postoperative clinical efficacy. Results: All patients successfully underwent the operation with satisfactory treatment outcomes. Compared to preoperative scores, the self-reported scores or pain while performing daily activities were significantly improved in both treatment groups (P<0.05).No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative bed rest, and postoperative hospital stay (P > 0.05). The overall postoperative complication rate was similar between the two groups.Moreover, no statistically significant differences in VAS-back pain scores, VAS-leg pain scores, JOA scores, and MacNab classification were found between the groups at the 3-month and 1.5-year follow-up examinations (P>0.05).Conclusion: PELD is safe and effective for the treatment of LSS in elderly patients. Age is not a contraindication for decompressive lumbar spine surgery. PELD has advantages such as reduced trauma, fewer anesthesia-related complications, and a fast postoperative recovery.Elderly patients should be considered good candidates for lumbar decompression surgery using minimally invasive techniques.

Download Full-text

Linical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: a retrospective study

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research ◽

10.1186/s13018-020-01968-0 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Hua Li ◽

Yufu Ou ◽

Furong Xie ◽

Weiguo Liang ◽

Gang Tian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Elderly Patients ◽

Spinal Stenosis ◽

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽

Lumbar Discectomy ◽

Lumbar Spine Surgery ◽

Decompression Surgery ◽

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ◽

Pain Scores ◽

Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ◽

Lumbar Spinal

Abstract Background Although percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is increasingly being used to treat lumbar degenerative disease, the treatment of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) involves considerable uncertainty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of PELD for the treatment of LSS in elderly patients aged 65 years or older. Methods In this retrospective review, 136 patients aged 65 years or older who underwent PELD to treat LSS were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups, group A (ages 65–74) and group B (age ≥ 75), and perioperative data were analyzed. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and MacNab classification were used to evaluate postoperative clinical efficacy. Results All patients successfully underwent the operation with satisfactory treatment outcomes. Compared to preoperative scores, the self-reported scores or pain while performing daily activities were significantly improved in both treatment groups (P < 0.05). No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative bed rest, and postoperative hospital stay (P > 0.05). The overall postoperative complication rate was similar between the two groups. Moreover, no statistically significant differences in VAS-back pain scores, VAS-leg pain scores, JOA scores, and MacNab classification were found between the groups at the 3-month and 1.5-year follow-up examinations (P > 0.05). Conclusion PELD is safe and effective for the treatment of LSS in elderly patients. Age is not a contraindication for decompressive lumbar spine surgery. PELD has advantages such as reduced trauma, fewer anesthesia-related complications, and a fast postoperative recovery. Elderly patients should be considered good candidates for lumbar decompression surgery using minimally invasive techniques.

Download Full-text

Treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with postoperative three-dimensional traction

Expert Review of Medical Devices ◽

10.1080/17434440.2019.1599282 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 16 (4) ◽

pp. 317-323 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Dexin Hu ◽

Jun Fei ◽

Genjun Chen ◽

Yongjie Yu ◽

Zhen Lai

Keyword(s):

Elderly Patients ◽

Spinal Stenosis ◽

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽

Three Dimensional ◽

Lumbar Discectomy ◽

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ◽

Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ◽

Lumbar Spinal

Download Full-text

Linical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients: a retrospective study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-37006/v3 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

hua Li ◽

Yufu Ou ◽

Furong Xie ◽

Weiguo Liang ◽

Gang Tian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Elderly Patients ◽

Spinal Stenosis ◽

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽

Lumbar Discectomy ◽

Lumbar Spine Surgery ◽

Decompression Surgery ◽

Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ◽

Pain Scores ◽

Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ◽

Lumbar Spinal

Abstract Background: Although: percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is increasingly being used to treat lumbar degenerative disease, the treatment of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) involves considerable uncertainty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of PELD for the treatment of LSS in elderly patients aged 65 years or older. Methods: In this retrospective review, 136 patients aged 65 years or older who underwent PELD to treat LSS were evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups, group A (age 65-74) and group B (age ≥ 75), and perioperative data were analyzed. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and MacNab classification were used to evaluate postoperative clinical efficacy. Results: All patients successfully underwent the operation with satisfactory treatment outcomes. Compared to preoperative scores, the self-reported scores for pain while performing daily activities were significantly improved in both treatment groups (P<0.05). No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative bed rest, and postoperative hospital stay (P > 0.05). The overall postoperative complication rate was similar between the two groups. Moreover, no statistically significant differences in VAS-back pain scores, VAS-leg pain scores, JOA scores, and MacNab classification were found between the groups at the 3-month and 1.5-year follow-up examinations (P>0.05). Conclusion: PELD is safe and effective for the treatment of LSS in elderly patients. Age is not a contraindication for decompressive lumbar spine surgery. PELD has advantages such as reduced trauma, fewer anesthesia-related complications, and a fast postoperative recovery. Elderly patients should be considered good candidates for lumbar decompression surgery using minimally invasive techniques.

Download Full-text

Comparative Analysis of Non-Full and Full Endoscopic Spine Technique via Interlaminar Approach for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective, Single Institute, Propensity Score-Matched Study

Global Spine Journal ◽

10.1177/21925682211039181 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 219256822110391

Author(s):

Qiang Jiang ◽

Yu Ding ◽

Zhengcao Lu ◽

Hongpeng Cui ◽

Jianjun Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Propensity Score ◽

Radiation Exposure ◽

Spinal Stenosis ◽

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽

Clinical Efficacy ◽

Operation Time ◽

Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽

Interlaminar Approach ◽

Intraoperative Fluoroscopy ◽

Lumbar Spinal

Study Design: Retrospective study. Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of posterior lumbar laminectomy decompression under full endoscopic technique (Endo-LOVE) and percutaneous endoscopic medial foraminal decompression (PE-MFD) in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). Methods: Between April 2017 and April 2018, 96 patients with DLSS underwent Endo-LOVE or PE-MFD, including 58 with Endo-LOVE and 38 with PE-MFD. After propensity score matching (PSM), patient characteristics, operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, postoperative bedridden time, hospital stay and postoperative complications were recorded and compared. The clinical efficacy was evaluated according to Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS), lumbar disease JOA and modified MacNab criteria. Results: A total of 96 patients with DLSS were included in the study. After PSM, the 2 groups were comparable in patient demographic and baseline characteristics. The operation time and intraoperative fluoroscopy times in PE-MFD group were significantly more than those in Endo-LOVE group ( P < .05). The operation time in PE-MFD group was significantly less than that in Endo-LOVE group ( P < .05). The intraoperative fluoroscopy times in PE-MFD group were significantly more than that in Endo-LOVE group ( P < .05). The ODI, VAS and lumbar disease JOA in the 2 groups were significantly improved comparing with those before operation ( P < .05). According to the modified MacNab criteria, the excellent and good rates of the 2 groups were 93.5% in Endo-LOVE group and 87.1% in PE-MFD group ( P > .05). Conclusion: Endo-LOVE and PE-MFD technique can both effectively treat DLSS, and the short-term follow-up results are positive. Endo-LOVE technique has the advantages of fast puncture positioning, less radiation exposure and wider indications. However, PE-MFD needs more radiation exposure and has the possibility of incomplete decompression for complex multiplanar spinal stenosis.

Download Full-text

A comparative study of Lumbar Decompression and Fusion with Internal Fixation versus Simple Decompression in elderly patients with two-segment Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences ◽

10.12669/pjms.37.1.2287 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 37 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Pengfa Tu ◽

Shuo Cao ◽

Chenyang Jiang ◽

Chong-chao Yan

Keyword(s):

Elderly Patients ◽

Internal Fixation ◽

Spinal Stenosis ◽

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽

Operation Time ◽

Leg Pain ◽

Wound Complications ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Lumbar Spinal ◽

Simple Decompression

Objective: To investigate and compare the effect of decompression and fusion with internal fixation vs. simple decompression in the treatment of elderly patients with two-segment lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in perioperative and postoperative follow-up periods. Methods: Twenty-eight elderly patients with two-segment LSS admitted in Baoding First Hospital between Mar. 2017 and Jan. 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Fifteen patients who underwent simple decompression were included in the simple decompression group, and 13 who underwent decompression and fusion with internal fixation were included in the decompression-fixation group. The general data and perioperative conditions including wound complications, operation time, blood loss, and VAS (legs) and JOA score were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: There was no significant difference in postoperative leg pain (VAS) between the two groups, and a statistically significant difference in JOA score was found between the two groups one month after the operation. The operation time, length of stay, and blood loss in the decompression-fixation group were significantly different from those in the simple decompression group and no significant difference in wound complications was observed between the two groups. Conclusion: There is no significant difference in leg pain relief in elderly patients with two-segment LSS when treated with decompression and fusion with internal fixation or simple decompression. Simple decompression is associated with less intraoperative injuries, better postoperative functional recovery, and reduced hospital stay. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.2287 How to cite this:Tu P, Cao S, Jiang C, Yan CC. A comparative study of Lumbar Decompression and Fusion with Internal Fixation versus Simple Decompression in elderly patients with two-segment Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(1):256-260. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.1.2287 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Download Full-text

Lumbar Scoliosis Combined Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Herniation Diagnosed Patient Was Treated with “U” Route Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Case Reports in Orthopedics ◽

10.1155/2017/7439016 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 2017 ◽

pp. 1-6 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Binbin Wu ◽

Shaobo Zhang ◽

Qingquan Lian ◽

Haibo Yan ◽

Xianfa Lin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Low Back Pain ◽

Back Pain ◽

Pain Intensity ◽

Spinal Stenosis ◽

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽

Lumbar Discectomy ◽

Low Back ◽

Lumbar Scoliosis ◽

Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy ◽

Lumbar Spinal

The objective was to report a case of a 63-year-old man with a history of low back pain (LBP) and left leg pain for 2 years, and the symptom became more serious in the past 5 months. The patient was diagnosed with lumbar scoliosis combined with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and lumbar disc herniation (LDH) at the level of L4-5 that was confirmed using Computerized Topography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. The surgical team preformed a novel technique, “U” route transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD), which led to substantial, long-term success in reduction of pain intensity and disability. After removing the osteophyte mass posterior to the thecal sac at L4-5, the working channel direction was changed to the gap between posterior longitudinal ligament and thecal sac, and we also removed the herniation and osteophyte at L3-4 with “U” route PELD. The patient’s symptoms were improved immediately after the surgical intervention; low back pain intensity decreased from preoperative 9 to postoperative 2 on a visual analog scale (VAS) recorded at 1 month postoperatively. The success of the intervention suggests that “U” route PELD may be a feasible alternative to treat lumbar scoliosis with LSS and LDH patients.

Download Full-text

The Therapeutic Evaluation of Spinal Canal Decompression by Using the TBEIS Technique in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

BioMed Research International ◽

10.1155/2020/6183027 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2020 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Kemin You ◽

Bo Li ◽

Hongze Chang ◽

Yan Zhang ◽

Feng Cai ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Elderly Patients ◽

Spinal Stenosis ◽

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ◽

Clinical Efficacy ◽

The Elderly ◽

Clinical Effects ◽

Vas Scores ◽

Immediate Surgery ◽

Lumbar Spinal

Objective. To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the percutaneous endoscopic Transforaminal Broad Easy Immediate Surgery (TBEIS) technology in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Methods. From February 2016 to May 2018, 35 elderly patients with LSS were treated with the TBEIS technique. There were 23 males and 12 females, aged from 53 to 72 years with a median age of 63.1 years. Preoperative, 1 day, and 1 and 12 months postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were statistically analyzed. The modified MacNab criterion was used to assess the clinical effects. The radiological outcomes were evaluated by X-ray and computed tomography (CT). Results. All of the operations were successful. The operative time ranged from 120 to 170 min with a median time of 148 min. All of the patients were followed up for 12 to 38 months with a median follow-up of 18 months. Preoperative, 1 day, and 1 and 12 months postoperative VAS leg scores were 6.91±0.98, 1.69±0.68, 1.23±0.59, and 0.91±0.61, respectively, and the VAS back scores improved from 4.51±0.82 to 0.66±0.68. The ODI scores were 63.82±7.59, 38.79±6.36, 24.79±3.90, and 11.33±3.92, respectively. Postoperative scores of VAS and ODI were obviously improved (P<0.01). According to the modified MacNab criteria used to evaluate the clinical effects, 11 cases achieved excellent results, 18 cases achieved good results, 4 cases achieved fair results, and 2 cases achieved poor results. There were no neurovascular injury and other complications. Conclusions. Treatment of LSS in the elderly patients by the TBEIS technology has good clinical efficacy, and the technique is safe and minimally invasive.

Download Full-text