scholarly journals Prognostic Impact of Tumor Length in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao Yang Wang ◽  
Yuanzhu Jiang ◽  
Wen Xiao ◽  
Xianbiao Xue ◽  
Xiangwei Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: In clinical work, it has been increasingly found that the prognosis is still very different even for esophageal cancer (EC) patients with the same TNM stage. Tumor length has been analysed as a possible independent prognostic factor in many studies, but no unanimous conclusion has been reached. Therefore, this review used a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between tumor length and prognosis in EC patients.Methods: A systematic search for relevant articles was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as effective measures to estimate the correlation between tumor length and prognosis, including overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, disease-specific survival, and cancer-specific survival. STATA 15.0 software was used to perform the meta-analysis and the data synthesis.Results: Finally, 41 articles with 28,973 patients were included in our study. The comprehensive statistical results showed that long tumors are an independent prognostic parameter associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR=1.30; 95% CI: 1.21-1.40, p<.001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR=1.38; 95% CI: 1.18-1.61, p<.001) in EC patients. Subgroup analyses also suggested a significant correlation between long tumors and poor OS. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias evaluation confirmed the reliability and stability of the results. Similar results were obtained in the analyses of progression-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS).Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis showed that long tumors were related to poor OS, DFS, PFS, DSS and CSS in EC patients. Tumor length might be an important predictor of prognosis in EC patients, and it can be used as an independent staging index. Further well-designed and large-scale prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings.

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao Yang Wang ◽  
Yuan Zhu Jiang ◽  
Wen Xiao ◽  
Xian Biao Xue ◽  
Xiang Wei Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In clinical studies, it has been observed that esophageal cancer (EC) patient prognosis can be very different even for those patients with tumors of the same TNM stage. Tumor length has been analysed as a possible independent prognostic factor in many studies, but no unanimous conclusion has been reached. Therefore, this review used a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between tumor length and prognosis in EC patients. Methods A systematic search for relevant articles was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as effective measures to estimate the correlation between tumor length and prognosis, including overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, disease-specific survival, and cancer-specific survival. STATA 15.0 software was used to perform the meta-analysis and the data synthesis. Results Finally, 41 articles with 28,973 patients were included in our study. The comprehensive statistical results showed that long tumors are an independent prognostic parameter associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.21–1.40, p < .001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.18–1.61, p < .001) in EC patients. Subgroup analyses also suggested a significant correlation between long tumors and poor OS. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias evaluation confirmed the reliability and stability of the results. Similar results were obtained in the analyses of progression-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Conclusion The results of this meta-analysis showed that long tumors were related to poor OS, DFS, PFS, DSS and CSS in EC patients. Tumor length might be an important predictor of prognosis in EC patients, and it can be used as an independent staging index. Further well-designed and large-scale prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao Yang Wang ◽  
Yuanzhu Jiang ◽  
Wen Xiao ◽  
Xianbiao Xue ◽  
Xiangwei Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: In clinical work, it is increasingly finding that even for patients with the same TNM stage of esophageal cancer (EC), the prognosis of different patients is still very different. Tumor length has been analyzed as a possible independent prognostic factor in many studies, but no unanimous conclusion has been reached. Therefore, this review is expected to use meta-analysis to evaluate the association between tumor length and prognostic significance in EC patients.Methods: A systematic search for relevant articles was performed in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. Hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) will be used as effective measures to estimate the correlation between tumor length and prognostic significance including overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, disease-specific survival, and cancer-specific survival. We will use the software STATA 15.0 to perform the meta-analysis to calculate the data synthesis. Results: Finally, 41 articles with 28, 973 patients were included in our study. Comprehensive statistical results showed that long tumor is an independent prognostic parameter associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR=1.30; 95%CI: 1.21-1.40, p<.001) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR=1.38; 95% CI:1.18-1.61, p<.001) in EC patients. Subgroup analyses also suggested a significant correlation between long tumor and poor OS. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias evaluation confirmed the reliability and stability of these results. Similar results can be obtained in analyses of progress-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis showed that the long tumor was related to the poor OS, DFS, PFS, DSS and CSS in EC patients. It was suggested that tumor length might be an important predictor of prognosis in EC patients,and it can be used as an independent staging index. Further well-designed and large-scale prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanyuan Hu ◽  
Jie Shen ◽  
RuiKe Liu ◽  
ZhiMei Feng ◽  
ChangNing Zhang ◽  
...  

Background: The pretreatment prognostic nutritional index has been considered a potential prognostic biomarker in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but this remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to systematically assess the prognostic value of the prognostic nutritional index in patients with NSCLC. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CNKI. The hazard ratios (HRs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the link between the prognostic nutritional index and the oncological outcomes of patients with NSCLC, including overall survival, disease-free survival/recurrence-free survival, and progression-free survival. Results: Fifteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. Twelve of these studies explored the association between the prognostic nutritional index and the overall survival of patients with NSCLC. Our pooled analysis indicated that a low prognostic nutritional index was significantly related to adverse overall survival (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.44, 1.81; P < 0.001). Our results also showed that the prognostic nutritional index was a negative predictor for disease-free survival/recurrence-free survival, and progression-free survival in patients with NSCLC. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that there was a close association between the prognostic nutritional index value and prognosis in NSCLC patients and that the prognostic nutritional index may act as a useful prognostic biomarker in NSCLC patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Kai Liao ◽  
Yen-Lin Yu ◽  
Yueh-Chen Lin ◽  
Yu-Jen Hsu ◽  
Yih-Jong Chern ◽  
...  

Abstract Backgrounds The inflammatory biomarker “C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR)” has been reported to significantly correlate to a variety of human cancers. However, there are conflicting results regarding the prognostic value of CAR in colorectal cancer. Previous studies mainly assessed patients in Eastern countries, so their findings may not be applicable to the Western population. Therefore, this updated meta-analysis aimed to investigate the prognostic value of pre-treatment CAR and outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer. Methods We conducted a systematic search for eligible literature until October 31, 2020, using PubMed and Embase databases. Studies assessing pre-treatment CAR and outcomes of colorectal cancer were included. Outcome measures included overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, and clinicopathological features. The pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as effective values. Results A total of 15 studies involving 6329 patients were included in this study. The pooled results indicated that a high pre-treatment CAR was associated with poor overall survival (HR 2.028, 95% CI 1.808−2.275, p < 0.001) and poor disease-free survival/progression-free survival (HR 1.768, 95% CI 1.321–2.365, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed a constant prognostic value of the pre-treatment CAR despite different study regions, sample size, cancer stage, treatment methods, or the cut-off value used. We also noted a correlation between high pre-treatment CAR and old age, male sex, colon cancer, advanced stage (III/IV), large tumor size, poor differentiation, elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and the modified Glasgow prognostic score. Conclusions High pre-treatment CAR was associated with poor overall survival, disease-free survival, and progression-free survival in colorectal cancer. It can serve as a prognostic marker for colorectal cancer in clinical practice.


OTO Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473974X1987507
Author(s):  
Kevin J. Kovatch ◽  
Joshua D. Smith ◽  
Andrew C. Birkeland ◽  
John E. Hanks ◽  
Rasha Jawad ◽  
...  

Objectives To report our institutional experience, management, and outcomes of cutaneous periauricular squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Study Design Retrospective chart review. Setting Tertiary academic center. Subjects Patients undergoing treatment of cutaneous periauricular SCC from 2000 to 2016. Results A total of 112 patients had a median follow-up of 24.5 months, a mean ± SD age of 75.7 ± 10.6 years, and a strong male predominance (93.8%). Site distribution shows 87 (77.7%) auricular, 26 (23.2%) preauricular, and 10 (8.8%) postauricular lesions. Of auricular lesions, tumors involved the tragus (n = 3, 3.4%), helix/antihelix (n = 47, 54.0%), conchal bowl (n = 31, 35.6%), external auditory canal (n = 18, 16.1%), and lobule (n = 3, 3.4%). Most patients presented at stage I (52.7%) versus stages II (28.6%), III (6.3%), and IV (12.5%). Patients were largely treated surgically with primary tumor resection ranging from wide local excision to lateral temporal bone resection (± parotidectomy and neck dissection), with 17.0% and 5.4% receiving adjuvant radiation and chemoradiation, respectively. Metastatic spread was seen to the parotid (25.9%) and neck (26.8%), with most common cervical spread to level II. Overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival at 3 years were 62%, 89%, and 56%, respectively. Nodal disease was associated with worse disease-specific survival ( P < .001) and disease-free survival ( P = .042). Pre- and postauricular sites were associated with worse overall survival ( P = .007) relative to auricular sites. Conclusion Among cutaneous SCC, periauricular subsites pose treatment challenges related to surrounding anatomy and represent a unique tumor population. The reported propensity toward recurrence and patterns of metastasis may better guide treatment of aggressive tumors to include regional nodal dissection.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 3-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingxia Zhang ◽  
Jie Yang ◽  
Liang Du ◽  
Yong Zhou ◽  
Ka Li

Objectives: Over the past decade, some publications have reported that Immunoscore was associated with the prognosis of several cancers. To better understand this issue, we conducted this pooled analysis. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from their inceptions to 15 May 2019 to identify relevant articles. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated for overall survival, disease-free survival, and disease-specific survival. Results: A total of 26 cohort studies with 10,328 patients involving eight cancer specialties were evaluated mainly by the consensus Immunoscore. The pooled analysis indicated that a lower Immunoscore was associated with a poor overall survival (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.58, 2.70), disease-free survival (HR 2.40, 95% CI 1.96, 2.49), and disease-specific survival (HR 2.81, 95% CI 2.10, 3.77) for all cancers. The same convincing results were found in colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer (especially the consensus Immunoscore for colon cancer). In five other types of cancer the results were similar, but the sample sizes were limited. Conclusions: These findings support that Immunoscore is significantly associated with the prognosis of patients with cancer. It provides a reliable estimate of the risk of recurrence in patients with colon cancer. However, more high-quality studies are necessary to assess the prognostic value of Immunoscore in non-colon cancers.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 467-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Younghoon Kim ◽  
Xianyu Wen ◽  
Nam Yun Cho ◽  
Gyeong Hoon Kang

Background: The prognostic value of immune cells expressing programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) in cancer are controversial, and the potential differential impact of using tissue microarrays and whole tissue sections to assess the positivity of immune cells has not been addressed. Methods: The current study included 30 eligible studies with 7251 patients that evaluated the relationship between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes expressing PD-1/PD-L1 and overall survival and disease-free survival, or progression-free survival. Subgroup analysis was based on the tissue type of cancer and the type of tissue sampling (tissue microarray or whole tissue section). Results: In the meta-analysis, PD-1-positive and PD-L1-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes had a positive effect on disease-free survival or progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.732; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.565, 0.947; and HR 0.727; 95% CI 0.584, 0.905, respectively). PD-L1-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes had a positive impact on overall survival in studies using tissue microarray (HR 0.586; 95% CI 0.476, 0.721), but had a poor impact when only whole tissue sections were considered (HR 1.558; 95% CI 1.232, 1.969). Lung cancer was associated with good overall survival and disease-free survival (HR 0.639; 95% CI 0.491, 0.831; and HR 0.693; 95% CI 0.538, 0.891, respectively) for PD-1-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and colorectal cancer showed favorable disease-free survival (HR 0.471; 95% CI 0.308, 0.722) for PD-L1-positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Conclusion: Immune cells expressing PD-1 and PD-L1 within tumors are associated with the prognosis. However, the correlation may vary among different tumor types and by the type of tissue sampling used for the assessment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elahe Seyed Hosseini ◽  
Ali Nikkhah ◽  
Amir Sotudeh ◽  
Marziyeh Alizadeh Zarei ◽  
Fatemeh Izadpanah ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose An increasing number of studies have reported a significant association between long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) dysregulation and pancreatic cancers. In the present study, we aimed to gather articles to evaluate the prognostic value of long non coding RNA in pancreatic cancer. Experimental design We systematically searched all eligible articles from databases of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus to meta-analysis of published articles and screen association of multiple lncRNAs expression with clinicopathology and/or survival of pancreatic cancer. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to analysis of overall survival, disease-free survival and progression-free survival were measured with a fixed or random effects model. Results A total of 39 articles were included in the present meta-analysis. Our results showed that dysregulation of lncRNAs were linked to overall survival (39 studies, 4736 patients HR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.25 ± 0.58, random-effects in pancreatic cancer. Moreover, altered lncRNAs were also contributed to progression-free survival (8 studies, 1180 patients HR: 1.88, 95% CI (1.35–2.62) and disease-free survival (2 studies, 285 patients, HR: 6.07, 95% CI 1.28–28.78). In addition, our findings revealed the association between dysregulated RNAs and clinicopathological features in this type of cancer. Conclusions In conclusion, dysregulated lncRNAs could be served as promising biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of pancreatic cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 172460082110326
Author(s):  
Wenfeng Liu ◽  
Keshu Hu ◽  
Feng Zhang ◽  
Shenxin Lu ◽  
Rongxin Chen ◽  
...  

Background Recently, microRNA-221 has been found to be abnormally expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma; however, its clinical value has not been summarised. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the prognostic significance of miR-221 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Material and Methods PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, EMbase, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, VIP and Wanfang databases were searched for eligible articles. The endpoints included overall survival, progression-free survival, recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used to explore the relationship between miR-221 expression and clinical survival results of liver cancer patients. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed. Begg’s test and Egger’s test were conducted to evaluate publication bias. Results A total of nine studies including 607 patients were recruited for this meta-analysis. The pooled hazard ratios displayed that high miR-221 expression was remarkably associated with poorer overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.91, 95% confidence interval: 1.53–2.38, p < 0.01) and unfavourable progression-free survival/recurrence-free survival/metastasis-free survival/disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 2.02, 95% confidence interval: 1.58–2.57, p < 0.01). The results of Begg’s test and Egger’s test did not exhibit obvious publication bias. Conclusions High expression of miR-221 can predict poor outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma. miR-221 can be used as a promising prognostic biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma.


2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing-ping Xiao ◽  
Ji-sheng Wang ◽  
Yuan-yu Zhao ◽  
Jiang Du ◽  
Yunzi Wang

Abstract Introduction To investigate whether microsatellite instability (MSI) is an important prognostic biomarker for endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC).Methods The PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Cooperative Library databases were searched from inception to July 2021. Overall survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, EEC-specific survival, recurrence-free survival and the recurrence rate were pooled to analyze the correlation between MSI and EEC. In addition, Egger’s regression analysis and Begg’s test were used to detect publication bias.Results 17 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in our meta-analysis with a sample size of 4723, and the included patients with endometrioid cancer (EC) all were EEC. The pooled hazard ratios (HR) in patients with EEC shown that MSI was significantly associated with shorter overall survival [HR=1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.00-1.86), p=0.048, I2=60.6%], shorter disease-free survival [HR=1.99, 95% CI (1.31-3.01), p=0.000, I2=67.2%], shorter EEC-specific survival [HR=2.07, 95% CI (1.35-3.18), p=0.001, I2=31.6%] and a higher recurrence rate [Odds ratios (OR)=2.72, 95% CI (1.56-4.76), p=0.000, I2=0.0%]. In the early-stage EEC subgroup, MSI was significantly associated with shorter overall survival [HR=1.47, 95% CI (1.11-1.95), p=0.07], shorter disease-free survival [HR=4.17, 95% CI (2.37-7.41), p=0.000], and shorter progression-free survival [HR=2.41, 95% CI (1.05-5.54), p=0.039]. No significant heterogeneity was observed in overall survival (I2=20.9%), disease-free survival (I2=0.0%), or progression-free survival (I2=0.0%) in patients with early-stage EEC. Meanwhile, publication bias was not observed, and the p-value for Egger’s test of overall survival, disease-free survival, and EEC-specific survival were p=0.131, p=0.068 and p=0.987, respectively.Conclusion MSI is likely an important biomarker for poor prognosis in patients with EEC, and this correlation is even more certain in patients with early-stage EEC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document