scholarly journals Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index: A Precise Non-invasive Tool for Evaluation of Edema in Children with Nephrotic Syndrome.

Author(s):  
Hanan El-Halaby ◽  
Ashraf Bakr ◽  
Mohamed El-Assmy ◽  
Hussein Abdelaziz Abdalla ◽  
Marwa Salem ◽  
...  

Abstract Evaluating the volume status in children with Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) is mandatory to guide treatment and avoid unnecessary possibly hazardous albumin use. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the available tools used for volume status assessment and differentiating type of edema in children with INS. Sixty children with active INS were included and subdivided into hypovolemic and non-hypovolemic groups based on fractional excretion of sodium (FeNa%) and clinical assessment. All patients were studied for Inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI), plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) concentration and Body composition monitor (BCM). Forty-four patients (77.3%) had non-hypovolemic and 16 (26.7%) had hypovolemic states. Plasma ANP levels didn’t differ between hypovolemic and non-hypovolemic subgroups. IVCCI was higher in hypovolemic group (p<0.001) with sensitivity 87.5% and specificity 81.8% for hypovolemia detection while BCM-over hydration (BCM-OH) values were higher in non-hypovolemic group (p=0.04) with sensitivity= 68.2% and specificity =75% for detection of hypervolemia. FeNa% showed negative significant correlation with IVCCI (r= -0.578, p <0.001) and positive significant correlation with BCM-OH (r= 0.33, p=0.018), while FeNa% showed non-significant correlation to plasma ANP concentration (p=0.25). Conclusion: Non-hypovolemic edema is more frequent in edematous INS children than hypovolemic states. IVCCI is a reliable non-invasive bedside tool for evaluating volume status in INS children and is superior to BCM while plasma ANP levels can’t discriminate type of edema in INS.

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  

Fluid therapy is an essential component part management of critically ill patients. Proper estimation of the amount of needed fluids is of great importance due to the well-established adverse effects of marked negative and positive fluids balance. Central venous pressure has been widely used by ICU physicians for volume status assessment. Several methods have been postulated for volume status assessment, among which is the inferior vena cava collapsibility index. As the inferior vena cava is a thin-walled capacitance vessel that adjusts to the body’s volume status by changing its diameter depending on the total body fluid volume. Giving the fact that bed-side ultrasonographic measurement of inferior vena cava diameters is an available, non-invasive, reproducible and quiet easy-to-learn technique, it can provide a safe and quiet reliable replacement of central venous pressure measurement for assessment of volume status assessment. The aim of this study was to find statistical correlation between central venous pressure and caval index, as a step towards validating the above mentioned replacement. 86 critically ill patients from ICU population were enrolled. Simultaneous measurements of central venous pressure and inferior vena cava collapsibility index were observed and recorded on four sessions. Patients were also grouped based on their mode of ventilation and central venous pressure values in order to compare the strength of correlation between various populations. The results showed that Inferior vena cava collapsibility index has significant inverse correlation with CVP value (r= -85, p value ˂0.001 at 95% CI) and it better correlated with mean arterial blood pressure and lactate clearance as compared to central venous pressure. However it correlated better with CVP in spontaneously breathing patients (r= -0.86, p value ˂0.001) than in mechanically ventilated patients (r= -0.84, p value ˂0.001). Inferior vena cava collapsibility index has shown to correlate better with CVP value in lower values (˂ 10 cmH2O) (r= -0.8, p value ˂0.001) than in higher values (≥ 10 cmH2O) (r= -0.6, p value ˂0.001). In addition, an inferior vena caval collapsibility index cut-off value of 29% was shown to discriminate between CVP values ˂10 cmH2O and values ≥10 cmH2O with high Sensitivity (88.6%) and specificity (80.4%). In conclusion, inferior vena cava collapsibility index has a strong inverse relationship with central venous pressure which is more pronounced at low central venous pressure values. Point-of-care ultrasonographically-measured inferior vena cava collapsibility index is very likely to be a good alternative to central venous pressure measurement with a high degree of precision and reproducibility. However, Wide scale studies are needed to validate its use in different patient populations.


Electronics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1671
Author(s):  
Luca Mesin ◽  
Silvestro Roatta ◽  
Paolo Pasquero ◽  
Massimo Porta

Assessment of volume status is important to correctly plan the treatment of patients admitted and managed by cardiology, emergency and internal medicine departments. Non-invasive assessment of volume status by echography of the inferior vena cava (IVC) is a promising possibility, but its clinical use is limited by poor reproducibility of current standard procedures. We have developed new algorithms to extract reliable information from non-invasive IVC monitoring by ultrasound (US) imaging. Both long and short axis US B-mode video-clips were taken from 50 patients, in either hypo-, eu-, or hyper-volemic conditions. The video-clips were processed to extract static and dynamic indexes characterizing the IVC behaviour. Different binary tree models (BTM) were developed to identify patient conditions on the basis of those indexes. The best classifier was a BTM using IVC pulsatility indexes as input features. Its accuracy (78.0% when tested with a leave-one-out approach) is superior to that achieved using indexes measured by the standard clinical method from M-mode US recordings. These results were obtained with patients in conditions of normal respiratory function and cardiac rhythm. Further studies are necessary to extend this approach to patients with more complex cardio-respiratory conditions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 94-94
Author(s):  
Jianjun Gui ◽  
Zhengfei Yang ◽  
Mary Peberdy ◽  
Joseph Ornato ◽  
Wanchun Tang

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Ibrahim Nagi ◽  
Azza Mohamed Shafik ◽  
Amr Mohamed Abdel Fatah ◽  
Wessam Zaher Selima ◽  
Amira Fathy Hefny

Abstract Background Assessing fluid responsiveness is the key to successful resuscitation of critically-ill sepsis patients. The use of IVC variation is favored among the dynamic methods of fluid responsiveness assessment in the ICU because it is non-invasive and inexpensive; moreover, it does not demand a high level of training. The aim of this study is to determine the value of the IVC respiratory variability for predicting fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing sepsis patients with acute circulatory failure. Results In this prospective observational study, fifty-eight spontaneously breathing sepsis patients admitted in the ICU were enrolled after the approval of the departmental Research Ethical Committee, and the informed written consent had been taken from the patients. Ultrasonographic and echocardiographic parameters were measured “IVC parameters and stroke volume (SV)” with calculation of the inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI) and cardiac output. These values were obtained before (baseline) and after volume expansion with a fluid bolus. The study showed that twenty-nine patients (50%) were considered to be responders, with an increase in CO by 10% or more after fluid challenge. There was a significant difference between responders and non-responders in baseline IVCCI (p value < 0.001). There were no significant differences between responders and non-responders in terms of demographic and baseline clinical characteristics. Also, there was statistically significantly larger maximum (IVC max) and minimum (IVC min) inferior vena cava diameters before volume expansion in non-responders than in responders with p value 0.037 and 0.001 respectively. The suggested cut off value regarding baseline IVCCI to predict response to fluid infusion is 0.32 with a high chance of response above this figure (a sensitivity of 72.41% and a specificity of 82.76%). Conclusions Inferior vena cava collapsibility index assessment can be a sensitive and a good predictor of fluid responsiveness, being based on a safe and a non-invasive technique compared to other methods such as central venous pressure (CVP) measurement and pulmonary artery catheter insertion.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 1298
Author(s):  
Deepesh Gupta ◽  
Kusum Devpura ◽  
Kamlesh Kumar Agrawal

Background: There is triad of hypoalbuminemia, edema, and hyperlipidemia in nephrotic syndrome patients. Management of nephrotic syndrome includes general measures like fluid restriction, emergency albumin transfusions and diuretics that provide symptomatic relief till steroids act. These measures require an assessment of body fluid volume to avoid circulatory failure which is very difficult in these patients because of edema. The objective of the study was to measure and compare the Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Index and Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility (IVCC) Index by ultrasound as a measure of body fluid volume status in children with nephrotic syndrome.Methods: The present observational study was conducted in all children of age more than 1 year up to 18 year. There were two groups; group 1 was nephrotic syndrome patients-Initial episode or in relapse and group 2 (Control) was age and sex-matched non-nephrotic children. IVC index and IVCC index were measured and compared in both the groups.Results: Mean value of minimum diameter of IVC during inspiration in cases was 5.91±1.60 mm as compared to 4.53±0.94 mm in controls which was significantly higher in case group {P ˂0.0001}. Mean value of IVC index in cases was 0.88±0.20 cm/m2 as compared to 0.93±0.19 cm/m2 in controls which was non-significant. Mean value of IVCC index in cases (35.61±13.68) was significantly less as compared to controls (52.23±2.01) {P ˂0.0001}.Conclusions: The present study concluded that IVCC index is better indicator of body fluid volume status in nephrotic patients as compare to IVC index.


2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (9) ◽  
pp. 943-949
Author(s):  
Igor Ivanov ◽  
Vladimir Veselinov ◽  
Dejan Celic ◽  
Jadranka Dejanovic ◽  
Dusanka Obradovic ◽  
...  

Backoground/Aim. Assessing volume status in chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients is difficult despite several techniques have been developed. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the adequacy and efficacy of lung ultrasound (LUS) and B line score (BLS) in the assessment of volume status in patients on HD in comparison to other techniques: ultrasonographic determination of inferior vena cava diameter (IVCD), echocardiography (ECHO) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) determination. Methods. LUS, ECHO, ultrasonography of inferior vena cava in inspiration (IVCDi) and expiration (IVCDe), and BNP sampling were performed before and after HD in 83 patients. Results. A significant reduction of BLS, IVCDi, IVCDe, BNP and several ECHO parameters such as left atrium diameter (LA), left ventricular internal dimension in diastole and systole (LVIDd and LVIDs, respectively), and left atrial volume in systole (LAVs), was registered (p < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between BLS and BNP before (p = 0.01) and after HD (p = 0.05), and a weaker but significant correlation between BLS and IVCDi and IVCDe before HD (p = 0.05). Conclusion. All techniques assessed hypervolemia before and after HD successfully. BNP correlated with LUS before and after HD, and IVCDi and IVCDe correlated with LUS only before HD. LUS is cheap and simple to perform, can be performed bedside and can be reliably used for assessing volume status in HD patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document