Strategies for increasing gait speed in patients with hip osteoarthritis: their clinical significance and effects on hip loading
Abstract Background Change in gait speed is required in various situations in daily life, and can be achieved by changing stride length, cadence, or both. Differences in strategies for increasing gait speed may have different effects on the hip joint and on physical function. Our primary purpose was to determine the effects of strategies for increasing gait speed on hip pain and physical function in patients with hip osteoarthritis (OA). The secondary purpose was to examine the effects of strategies for increasing gait speed on the changes in hip loading during gait. Methods Forty-seven patients with secondary hip OA (age 48.3 ± 11.0 years) were included. Gait speed, stride length, cadence, and peak and impulse of the hip joint moment were measured during gait at self-selected normal and fast gait speeds, using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. The patients were classified as types S (increasing mainly stride length), C (increasing mainly cadence), and SC (increasing stride length and cadence) according to whether they used changes in stride length and/or cadence to transition from a normal to a fast gait. Hip pain, physical function, and change in hip moments during gait were compared between the types. Results The distribution of the patients was as follows: types S, 23.4%; C, 48.9%; and SC, 27.7%. Physical function status was higher in types C (P = 0.018) and SC (P = 0.015) than in type S, even after adjustment for age and minimum joint space width. Hip pain was not significantly different between the types. The robustness of those results was confirmed by a sensitivity analysis. The rates of the increases in peak external hip adduction (P = 0.003) and internal rotation moments (P = 0.009) were lower in type C than in type SC. Conclusions Type C tended to suppress the increase in hip joint moments during fast gait. Types C and SC, which included increased cadence, maintained higher physical function levels than type S. Encouraging use of a cadence-increasing strategy may be useful for reducing hip loading and maintaining physical function in patients with hip OA.