scholarly journals Feature-Tracking Strain Derived from Compressed Sensing Cine Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Infarct Detection: A Feasibility Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoro Morikawa ◽  
Yuki Tanabe ◽  
Tomoyuki Kido ◽  
Ryo Ogawa ◽  
Masashi Nakamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Compressed Sensing ◽  
Feature Tracking ◽  
Myocardial Infarct ◽  
Strain Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cine Cmr ◽  
Lge Cmr ◽  
Cmr Imaging

Abstract Purpose: This study aimed to use gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) scanning to examine the clinical feasibility of feature-tracking strain (FT-strain) analysis on compressed sensing (CS) cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for detecting myocardial infarction (MI).Methods: We enrolled 37 patients who underwent conventional cine CMR, CS cine CMR, and LGE-CMR scanning to assess cardiovascular disease. FT-strain analysis was used to assess peak circumferential strain (p-CS) based on an 18-segment model in both cine CMR imaging modalities. Based on LGE-CMR imaging findings, myocardial segments were classified as remote, adjacent, subendocardial infarcted, and transmural infarcted. The diagnostic performance of p-CS for detecting MI was compared between CS cine CMR imaging and conventional cine CMR imaging using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.Results: A total of 440 remote, 85 adjacent, 76 subendocardial infarcted, and 65 transmural infarcted segments were diagnosed on LGE-CMR imaging. There were significant between-group differences in p-CS on both conventional and CS cine CMR (p <0.05 in each) imaging. The sensitivity and specificity of p-CS for identifying MI were 85% and 79% for conventional cine CMR imaging, and 82% and 77% for CS cine CMR imaging, respectively. There was no significant difference between conventional and CS cine CMR imaging in the area under the curve of p-CS (0.89 vs. 0.87, p = 0.15).Conclusion: FT-strain analysis of CS cine CMR imaging may help identify MI; it may be used alongside or instead of conventional CMR imaging.

scholarly journals Comparison between conventional and compressed sensing cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance for feature tracking global circumferential strain assessment

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Kido ◽  
Kuniaki Hirai ◽  
Ryo Ogawa ◽  
Yuki Tanabe ◽  
Masashi Nakamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Compressed Sensing ◽  
Feature Tracking ◽  
Circumferential Strain ◽  
Strain Analysis ◽  
Global Circumferential Strain ◽  
Volume Assessment ◽  
Lv Volume ◽  
Cine Cmr

Abstract Background Feature tracking (FT) has become an established tool for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-based strain analysis. Recently, the compressed sensing (CS) technique has been applied to cine CMR, which has drastically reduced its acquisition time. However, the effects of CS imaging on FT strain analysis need to be carefully studied. This study aimed to investigate the use of CS cine CMR for FT strain analysis compared to conventional cine CMR. Methods Sixty-five patients with different left ventricular (LV) pathologies underwent both retrospective conventional cine CMR and prospective CS cine CMR using a prototype sequence with the comparable temporal and spatial resolution at 3 T. Eight short-axis cine images covering the entire LV were obtained and used for LV volume assessment and FT strain analysis. Prospective CS cine CMR data over 1.5 heartbeats were acquired to capture the complete end-diastolic data between the first and second heartbeats. LV volume assessment and FT strain analysis were performed using a dedicated software (ci42; Circle Cardiovasacular Imaging, Calgary, Canada), and the global circumferential strain (GCS) and GCS rate were calculated from both cine CMR sequences. Results There were no significant differences in the GCS (− 17.1% [− 11.7, − 19.5] vs. − 16.1% [− 11.9, − 19.3; p = 0.508) and GCS rate (− 0.8 [− 0.6, − 1.0] vs. − 0.8 [− 0.7, − 1.0]; p = 0.587) obtained using conventional and CS cine CMR. The GCS obtained using both methods showed excellent agreement (y = 0.99x − 0.24; r = 0.95; p < 0.001). The Bland–Altman analysis revealed that the mean difference in the GCS between the conventional and CS cine CMR was 0.1% with limits of agreement between -2.8% and 3.0%. No significant differences were found in all LV volume assessment between both types of cine CMR. Conclusion CS cine CMR could be used for GCS assessment by CMR-FT as well as conventional cine CMR. This finding further enhances the clinical utility of high-speed CS cine CMR imaging.

scholarly journals Myocardial deformation in patients with a single left ventricle using 2D cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking: a case–control study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian Strodka ◽  
Jana Logoteta ◽  
Roman Schuwerk ◽  
Mona Salehi Ravesh ◽  
Dominik Daniel Gabbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Feature Tracking ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Radial Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Lv Function ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lv Volumes

AbstractVentricular dysfunction is a well-known complication in single ventricle patients in Fontan circulation. As studies exclusively examining patients with a single left ventricle (SLV) are sparse, we assessed left ventricular (LV) function in SLV patients by using 2D-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (2D-CMR-FT) and 2D-speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE). 54 SLV patients (11.4, 3.1–38.1 years) and 35 age-matched controls (12.3, 6.3–25.8 years) were included. LV global longitudinal, circumferential and radial strain (GLS, GCS, GRS) and strain rate (GLSR, GCSR, GRSR) were measured using 2D-CMR-FT. LV volumes, ejection fraction (LVEF) and mass were determined from short axis images. 2D-STE was applied in patients to measure peak systolic GLS and GLSR. In a subgroup analysis, we compared double inlet left ventricle (DILV) with tricuspid atresia (TA) patients. The population consisted of 19 DILV patients, 24 TA patients and 11 patients with diverse diagnoses. 52 patients were in NYHA class I and 2 patients were in class II. Most SLV patients had a normal systolic function but median LVEF in patients was lower compared to controls (55.6% vs. 61.2%, p = 0.0001). 2D-CMR-FT demonstrated reduced GLS, GCS and GCSR values in patients compared to controls. LVEF correlated with GS values in patients (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between GLS values from 2D-CMR-FT and 2D-STE in the patient group. LVEF, LV volumes, GS and GSR (from 2D-CMR-FT) were not significantly different between DILV and TA patients. Although most SLV patients had a preserved EF derived by CMR, our results suggest that, LV deformation and function may behave differently in SLV patients compared to healthy subjects.

scholarly journals Patterns of cardiac involvement in patients with long COVID syndrome using cardiovascular magnetic resonance

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Puntmann ◽  
S Martin ◽  
B Vanchin ◽  
N Holm ◽  
E Giokoglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Late Complication ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Native T1 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Previous Hospitalization ◽  
Cmr Imaging

Abstract Background Long COVID (LC) is an increasingly recognized late complication of COVID-19 infection. Cardiovascular involvement has also been implicated, however, the type and extent of the underlying cardiovascular injury remains unknown. Purpose To evaluate the association between ongoing symptoms and findings with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in consecutive patients recently recovered from COVID-19 illness. Methods Prospective observational cohort study of patients recently recovered from COVID-19 illness and no previously known cardiovascular disease were included between April 2020 and April 2021. Demographic characteristics, cardiac blood markers, and CMR imaging a minimum of 4 weeks from the diagnosis were obtained. Results Of the 389 included patients, 192 (49%) were male, the mean (±standard deviation) age was 44 (±13) years and 61 (16%) required hospitalization during the acute illness. The median (IQR) time interval between COVID-19 diagnosis and CMR was 94 (71–165) days. 298 (77%) of patients continued to experience ongoing cardiovascular symptoms (long COVID, LC), including dyspnea, palpitations, atypical chest pain and fatigue at the time of CMR at least 4 weeks after the infection. In most patients, the symptoms were only effort related 137 (46%), whereas in 98 (33%) the symptoms affected the activities of daily life; 10 (3%) had severe and debilitating symptoms at rest. Compared to those with no LC (NLC, n=91), LC patients were more commonly hospitalized, had significantly higher native T1, native T2, and showed pericardial enhancement and effusion (Figure 1). There were no differences in cardiac biomarkers, left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular ejection fraction and mass. Proportionally, men and women were similarly affected (n=144 (73%) vs. n=157 (80%), p=0.18). Previous hospitalization was associated with hypertension and ongoing detectable troponin. LC status was associated with previous hospitalization and CMR findings of raised native T1 and native T2, and in females also pericardial enhancement. Severity of symptoms were associated with increased native T1 and T2 and decreased end-diastolic volume, whereas cardiac function showed no significant difference. Conclusions In this cohort of patients recently recovered from COVID-19 infection, ongoing cardiovascular symptoms were common. The LC status was related to previous hospitalization and CMR imaging findings of myopericardial inflammation. The extent and type of cardiovascular findings was associated with the severity of symptoms. These findings indicate the need for ongoing investigation of the long-term cardiovascular consequences of COVID-19. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): The German Heart Foundation (Deutsche Herzstiftung) and Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany Figure 1

scholarly journals Myocardial deformation in patients with a single left ventricle using 2D cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking: a case-control study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian Strodka ◽  
Jana Logoteta ◽  
Roman Schuwerk ◽  
Mona Salehi Ravesh ◽  
Dominik Daniel Gabbert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Feature Tracking ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Radial Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Lv Function ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lv Volumes

Abstract Purpose Ventricular dysfunction is a well-known complication in single ventricle patients in Fontan circulation. As studies exclusively examining patients with a single left ventricle (SLV) are sparse, we assessed left ventricular (LV) function in SLV patients by using 2D-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (2D-CMR-FT) and 2D-speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE). Methods 54 SLV patients (11.4, 3.1–38.1 years) and 35 age-matched controls (12.3, 6.3–25.8 years) were included. LV global longitudinal, circumferential and radial strain (GLS, GCS, GRS) and strain rate (GLSR, GCSR, GRSR) were measured using 2D-CMR-FT. LV volumes, ejection fraction (LVEF) and mass were determined from short axis images. 2D-STE was applied in patients to measure peak systolic GLS and GLSR. In a subgroup analysis, we compared double inlet left ventricle (DILV) with tricuspid atresia (TA) patients. Results The population consisted of 19 DILV patients, 24 TA patients and 11 patients with diverse diagnoses. 52 patients were in NYHA class I and 2 patients were in class II. Median LVEF in patients was lower compared to controls (55.6% vs. 61.2%, p = 0.0001). 2D-CMR-FT demonstrated reduced GLS, GCS and GCSR values in patients compared to controls. LVEF correlated with GS values in patients (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between GLS values from 2D-CMR-FT and 2D-STE in the patient group. LVEF, LV volumes, GS and GSR were not significantly different between DILV and TA patients. Conclusion Although most SLV patients had a preserved EF, our results suggest that, LV deformation and function may behave differently in SLV patients compared to healthy subjects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document