scholarly journals Needs Assessment In Patients Surgically Treated For Head And Neck Cancer – A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author(s):  
Annelise Mortensen ◽  
Irene Wessel ◽  
Simon Neave Rogers ◽  
Anders Tolver ◽  
Mary Jarden

Abstract Purpose:Investigate whether a head and neck cancer specific needs assessment tool integrated in nursing rehabilitation consultations early in the post-surgical period would improve quality of life and symptom burden in patients surgically treated. Further, to assess the feasibility of carrying out needs assessments during consultations. Methods:92 surgically treated head and neck cancer patients at the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark were enrolled. A two-arm randomized controlled trial design was used. Both arms received nursing rehabilitation consultations before discharge, approximately two weeks and two months post-operative. Patients in the intervention group had their needs assessed using an assessment tool.Primary outcome was quality of life. Secondary outcomes were symptom burden and referrals for multi-disciplinary rehabilitation follow-up. Results:No significant differences were found in quality of life or symptom burden. However, notable more patients in the intervention group were referred for rehabilitation. Conclusion:The intervention suggests that important needs were identified and addressed, especially emotional and existential needs, which were accommodated through referrals and professional advice. Nursing rehabilitation consultations using a needs assessment instrument may ensure that patient preferences and priorities are incorporated in their care. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.com (NCT03443258). Date of registration: May 31st, 2018

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 2117
Author(s):  
Marianne Boll Kristensen ◽  
Irene Wessel ◽  
Anne Marie Beck ◽  
Karin B. Dieperink ◽  
Tina Broby Mikkelsen ◽  
...  

Head and neck cancer survivors frequently experience nutritional challenges, and proper rehabilitation should be offered. The trial objective was to test the effect of a multidisciplinary residential nutritional rehabilitation programme addressing physical, psychological, and social aspects of eating problems after treatment. In a randomized controlled trial, 71 head and neck cancer survivors recruited through a nationwide survey were randomized to the program or a wait-list control group. Inclusion was based on self-reported interest in participation. The primary outcome was change in body weight. Secondary outcomes included physical function, quality of life, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Differences between groups at the 3-month follow-up were tested. No significant differences were seen in body weight change, but there were overall trends towards greater improvements in physical function (hand grip strength: p = 0.042; maximal mouth opening: p = 0.072) and quality of life (“Role functioning”: p = 0.041; “Speech problems”: p = 0.040; “Pain”: p = 0.048) in the intervention group. To conclude, a multidisciplinary residential nutritional rehabilitation program had no effect on body weight in head and neck cancer survivors with self-reported interest in participation, but it may have effect on physical function and quality of life. Further research on relevant outcomes, inclusion criteria, and the program’s effect in different subgroups is needed.


2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 189 ◽  
Author(s):  
AjeetKumar Gandhi ◽  
Soumyajit Roy ◽  
Alok Thakar ◽  
Atul Sharma ◽  
BidhuKalyan Mohanti

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document