scholarly journals Health-Related Quality of Life in PARP-Inhibitor Olaparib Maintenance in Ovarian Cancer Patients: Real World Data and Experience of a Single-Center in China

Author(s):  
Yi Jiang ◽  
Huangyang Meng ◽  
Xinjia Ruan ◽  
Lin Yuan ◽  
Chengyan Luo ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives:To preliminarily explore the germline BRCA1/2 gene mutation status of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), analyze the relationship with clinicopathological characteristics and the impact on survival and prognosis. Then examine the BRCA1/2 gene sequence mutation rate and the QOL of ovarian cancer patients with oral Olaparib in a single-center of China.Methods:A retrospective analysis of the survival and prognostic factors of 82 ovarian cancer patients who had undergone genetic testing in the Department of Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from 2015 to 2018. These patients also underwent germline BRCA1/2 genetic testing. Then, we use the Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the Quality of Life Ovarian Cancer 28 Questionnaire (QLQ-OV28) to determine the relationship between quality of life (QOL) in each category, and key demographic and clinical factors.Results: The total mutation rate of BRCA1/2 was 30.48%, among which the pathogenic mutation rate of BRCA1 was 20.73%, and the pathogenic mutation rate of BRCA2 was 9.75% in our single-center. A total of 18 pathogenic mutation sites and 2 mutation sites of unknown significance were found. Olaparib as maintenance therapy was significantly associated with better QOL on all functioning domains and several symptom domains. The patients without Olaparib maintenance therapy may experience deteriorating QOL in several domains. Conclusions: Patients with EOC have a higher frequency of BRCA1/2 gene mutation rate, which is related to the malignant biological behavior of the tumor. Patients with BRCA1/2 gene mutation may have a better prognosis. Olaparib maintenance therapy is associated with better QOL and higher QOL in several domains in single center of Chinese.

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Teo ◽  
Yin Bun Cheung ◽  
Timothy Yong Kuei Lim ◽  
Rama Padmavathi Namuduri ◽  
Victoria Long ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 509-514
Author(s):  
Irena Rohr ◽  
Sara Alavi ◽  
Rolf Richter ◽  
Maren Keller ◽  
Radoslav Chekerov ◽  
...  

BackgroundMaintenance therapy induces remission and prolongs disease free interval in primary and recurrent ovarian disease. For the treatment decision making process, aspects of quality of life and patients′ preferences are crucial, despite the fact that scientific data are lacking. Therefore, we conducted this European-wide study in patients with ovarian cancer.MethodsA 25 item questionnaire was provided to ovarian cancer patients via the internet or as a paper version in 10 European countries (Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Romania, Slovenia, Finland, Turkey, and Spain). Data recorded were demographics, tumor stage, therapy after firstline and recurrent disease, preferences for administration, and expectations concerning maintenance therapy.ResultsOverall, 1954 patients participated from September 2013 to March 2016; 42% had recurrent disease. Most patients (98%) with primary epithelial ovarian cancer underwent surgery followed by chemotherapy (91%). Almost one-third of participants (29%) were receiving maintenance therapy whereas 45% had only heard of it. For 70% of patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer, they heard about maintenance therapy from their doctor, 10% heard about maintenance therapy from other patients, and 8% from the internet. The main source of information about maintenance therapy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer relapse was from the treating physician (72%), from other patients (8%), and from the internet (7%). For patients undergoing maintenance therapy, the four most disturbing adverse effects were polyneuropathy (37%), nausea (36%), hair loss (34%), and vomiting (34%). The main objective of maintenance treatment, as perceived by patients, was to increase the chances of cure (73%), improvement in quality of life (47%), and delay in tumor growth (37%). Many patients were willing to undergo maintenance therapy until tumor progression (38%) and 39% would prefer oral administration. No significant differences were detected in the cross country subanalysis regarding expectations of maintenance therapy and patients with primary or relapsed ovarian cancer.ConclusionPatients with ovarian cancer were willing to accept maintenance therapy of prolonged duration and preferred oral administration. There is still a gap between the efficacy of maintenance therapy and patient expectations. Patients need more information on the adverse effects and treatment goals of maintenance therapy to avoid misunderstandings.


2013 ◽  
Vol 131 (3) ◽  
pp. 667-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan K. Lutgendorf ◽  
George M. Slavich ◽  
Koenraad DeGeest ◽  
Michael Goodheart ◽  
David Bender ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 125 ◽  
pp. S118
Author(s):  
A. Ahmed ◽  
K. Collins ◽  
K. De Geest ◽  
D. Bender ◽  
M. Goodheart ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document