Interactive Multiobjective Optimization for Finding The Most Preferred Exercise Therapy in Knee Osteoarthritis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babooshka shavazipour ◽  
Bekir Afsar ◽  
Juhani Multanen ◽  
Urho M Kujala ◽  
Kaisa Miettinen

Abstract Background: The primary purpose of this study is to develop a decision support approach to support physicians or other healthcare professionals in comparing different exercise therapies and identifying the most preferred one by balancing among cost, ability of improving physical function and reducing pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis.Methods: Thirty-one exercise therapies were selected from twenty-one randomized controlled trials from a previous meta-analysis. A multiobjective optimization model was designed to characterize the goodness of an exercise therapy based on five conflicting criteria: minimizing cost, maximizing pain reduction and disability improvement, minimizing the number of supervised exercise sessions and the length of the treatment period. Costs were estimated based on personal expenses regarding the information given in the collected randomized controlled trials. A novel interactive multiobjective optimization method was introduced to solve the model, where the physician’s preferences were taken into account in finding the most preferred exercise therapy. Results: An experienced physiotherapist was involved as a decision maker in the interactive solution process testing the proposed decision support approach. He iteratively provided preference information until he was satisfied with the set of therapies shown. After a more in-depth detailed analysis of selected therapies, the decision maker was able to find the most preferred exercise therapy based on the patient's needs and health status. Conclusions: The proposed interactive multiobjective optimization method is promising in supporting the decision maker in balancing among conflicting criteria to find the most preferred exercise therapy for patients with knee osteoarthritis. Moreover, the proposed method is generic enough to be applied in any field of medical and healthcare settings, where several alternative treatment options exist.

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 030006052110066
Author(s):  
Hua Zhang ◽  
Bo Wang ◽  
Jie He ◽  
Zhongju Du

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Methods A literature review was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane Review, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Two reviewers independently assessed the eligibility of all retrieved studies. The research was reported based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to ensure the reliability and verity of the results. The statistical analysis was performed using STATA version 13.0. Results Nine randomized controlled trials were collected for the data extraction and meta-analysis. Significant differences in the pain score at 4, 12, and 24 weeks were found between patients treated with radiofrequency ablation and those treated with placebo. Furthermore, the use of radiofrequency ablation was associated with an improved outcome of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index at 4, 12, and 24 weeks. No serious adverse events were observed in any patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation. Conclusion Radiofrequency ablation is efficacious and safe for reducing pain and improving knee function in patients with knee osteoarthritis, without increasing the risk of adverse effects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document