Constructing ecological indices for urban environments using species distribution models
Abstract In an increasingly urbanized world, there is the need for a framework to assess ecological conditions in these anthropogenically dominated environments. Using species observations from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), along with remotely sensed environmental layers, we used MaxEnt to construct species distribution models (SDMs) of native and non-native species in Los Angeles. 25 native and non-native Indicator species were selected based on the sensitivities of their SDM, as measured by the Symmetric Extremal Dependence Index (SEDI), to environmental gradients. These SDMs were summarized to produce ecological indices of native and non-native biodiversity in Los Angeles. We found native indicator species to have a greater sensitivity to environmental conditions than their non-native counterparts, with the mean SEDI score of native and non-native species MaxEnt models being 0.72 and 0.71 respectively. While both sets of species were sensitive to land use categories and housing density, native species were more sensitive to natural landscape variables while non-native ones were more sensitive to measures of water and soil contamination. Using random forest modeling we also found our native index could be more reliably predicted, given environmental conditions, than its non-native counterpart. The mean Pearson correlation between actual and predicted index values were 0.86 and 0.84 for native and non-native species. From these results we conclude that using SDMs to predict the biodiversity of environmental species is a suitable approach towards evaluating ecological conditions in urban environments, with the environmental sensitivity of native SDMs outperforming non-native ones.