scholarly journals Impact of Enhanced Recovery Program (ERP) on Clinical Outcomes After Elective Colorectal Surgery in a Rural Hospital: A Prospective Cohort Study with Retrospective Control.

Author(s):  
ANTONIO PESCE ◽  
Mattia Portinari ◽  
Nicolò Fabbri ◽  
Valeria Sciascia ◽  
Lisa Uccellatori ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: The main purpose was to determine the impact on postoperative outcome of a standardized enhanced recovery program (ERP) for elective colorectal surgery in a rural hospital. Methods A prospective series of patients (N = 80) undergoing elective colorectal resection completing a standardized ERP protocol in 2018–2020 (ERP group) was compared to patients (N = 80) operated at the same rural hospital in 2013–2015 (pre-ERP group), before the implementation of the program. The exclusion criteria for both groups were: ASA score IV, TNM stage IV, inflammatory bowel disease, emergency surgery, and rectal cancer. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LoS) which was used as an estimate of functional recovery. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission and mortality rates as well as factors predicting both postoperative complications and prolonged hospital LoS. Results Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. Laparoscopic approach was performed in 95% of patients in the ERP group versus 0% in pre-ERP group. The median adherence to ERP protocol elements was 68% as opposed to 12% in the retrospective control group. The median hospital LoS in the ERP-group was significantly lower than in the pre-ERP group (5 vs. 10 days) with no increase in 30-day readmission and mortality rates. The Body Mass Index ≥ 30 and the traditional perioperative protocol were the independent predictive factors of postoperative complications, while following a traditional peri-operative protocol was the only factor predicting a prolonged hospital LoS. Conclusions Although limited hospital resources are perceived as a barrier to ERP implementation, the current experience demonstrates how adopting an ERP program in a rural area is feasible and effective, despite it requires greater effort. For patients in such areas, colorectal ERP in elective surgery may also reduce time to functional recovery, postoperative hospital LoS and complications, with no increase in mortality and 30-day re-admissions.

2021 ◽  
Vol 233 (5) ◽  
pp. e25
Author(s):  
Antonio Pesce ◽  
Mattia Portinari ◽  
Nicolò Fabbri ◽  
Valeria Sciascia ◽  
Lisa Uccellatori Ms ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-355
Author(s):  
Ben E. Byrne ◽  
Omar D. Faiz ◽  
Alex Bottle ◽  
Paul Aylin ◽  
Charles A. Vincent

Abstract Background Randomised trials have shown an Enhanced Recovery Program (ERP) can shorten stay after colorectal surgery. Previous research has focused on patient compliance neglecting the role of care providers. National data on implementation and adherence to standardised care are lacking. We examined care organisation and delivery including the ERP, and correlated this with clinical outcomes. Methods A cross-sectional questionnaire was administered to surgeons and nurses in August–October 2015. All English National Health Service Trusts providing elective colorectal surgery were invited. Responses frequencies and variation were examined. Exploratory factor analysis was performed to identify underlying features of care. Standardised factor scores were correlated with elective clinical outcomes of length of stay, mortality and readmission rates from 2013–15. Results 218/600 (36.3%) postal responses were received from 84/90 (93.3%) Trusts that agreed to participate. Combined with email responses, 301 surveys were analysed. 281/301 (93.4%) agreed or strongly agreed that they had a standardised, ERP-based care protocol. However, 182/301 (60.5%) indicated all consultants managed post-operative oral intake similarly. After factor analysis, higher hospital average ERP-based care standardisation and clinician adherence score were significantly correlated with reduced length of stay, as well as higher ratings of teamwork and support for complication management. Conclusions Standardised, ERP-based care was near universal, but clinician adherence varied markedly. Units reporting higher levels of clinician adherence achieved the lowest length of stay. Having a protocol is not enough. Careful implementation and adherence by all of the team is vital to achieve the best results.


Gut ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 64 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A342.1-A342 ◽  
Author(s):  
CF Thomas ◽  
P Coyne ◽  
T Collins ◽  
S Holtham ◽  
G Odair

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 587-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Carmen Lirosi ◽  
Flavio Tirelli ◽  
Alberto Biondi ◽  
Maria Cristina Mele ◽  
Cristina Larotonda ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 153 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Carrier ◽  
E. Cotte ◽  
L. Beyer-Berjot ◽  
J.L. Faucheron ◽  
J. Joris ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 266 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio Flavio Fiore ◽  
Tanya Castelino ◽  
Nicolò Pecorelli ◽  
Petru Niculiseanu ◽  
Saba Balvardi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document