Dual Block HER2 Assessment Increased HER2 Immunohistochemistry Positive Rate in Resected Specimens of Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial From China

Author(s):  
Chen Xu ◽  
Miaomiao Sun ◽  
Mei Jin ◽  
Zengshan Li ◽  
Rong Qin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Former single center studies indicated that HER2 assessment with two primary tumor blocks (dual block HER2 assessment) could be an efficient and practical approach to overcome the adverse impact of heterogeneity and acquire a HER2 positive rate in gastric cancer (GC). This multicenter prospective clinical trial (NCT 02843412) was launched to verify its value and generality. Methods A total of 3806 participants with primary GCs have been enrolled from 8 hospitals in China. Two primary tumor blocks were selected and recorded as block 1 and block 2 after histological evaluation. An HER2 (4B5) rabbit monoclonal antibody was used for the immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. In total patients, HER2 IHC positive (3+) rate with dual block assessment (9.4%) was higher than that with single block assessment (block 1: 7.8%, block 2: 7.8%) (P < 0.001). Compared with single-block assessment, dual-block assessment increased the positive rate by approximate 20%. Similarly, HER2 equivocal (2+) rate was increased in dual block assessment (25.8%), which was higher than that in single block assessment (block 1: 20.3%, block 2: 20.9%) (P < 0.001). Conversely, dual block assessment demonstrated a lower HER2 negative (0/1+) rate (64.8%) than single block assessment (block1: 71.9%, block 2: 71.3%) (P < 0.001). These findings were also confirmed in individual hospitals. Conclusions Dual block HER2 assessment effectively increased HER2 IHC positive rate in resected specimens of GC. We recommended dual block HER2 assessment be promoted in routine clinical practice in GC.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4108-4108
Author(s):  
Eiji Shinozaki ◽  
Noriko Yamamoto ◽  
Akio Saiura ◽  
Takeshi Sano ◽  
Keisho Chin ◽  
...  

4108 Background: Trastuzumab is the 1st molecular targeting drug in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer that has been shown to confer overall survival benefit adding to chemotherapy. In breast cancer it has been already used long time, it is known that there are the discordance of its target; HER2 between primary and metastatic site. Although molecular targeting drugs as Trastuzumab are expected to control the metastatic disease, molecular status is usually evaluated in the primary site because metastatic sites are difficult to biopsy. In this study we attempted to compare HER2 and its related molecular status, which have interaction each together, between primary and paired liver metastatic sites in gastric cancer. Methods: Total 58 consecutive cases with gastric cancer who underwent surgical resection of primary site and synchronous or metachronous liver metastasis were examined. HER2, EGFR, c-MET and IGF-1R status were evaluated by immunohistochemistry(IHC) in primary and paired liver metastasis. HER2 expression by IHC using HercepTest (DAKO) were assessed according to Gastric Cancer Scoring System. On the other molecular expression by IHC, positive expression was defined as 25% or more staining with intensity 2 or 3+. We analyzed the concordance of their expression in both sites. Results: The patient cohort consists predominantly of male (78%), with Lauren’s diffuse (37%) and intestinal tumors (62%). Fifty three percent of cases were synchronous liver metastasis. The positive rate of primary and paired liver metastatic sites were 10.3%, 8.6% in HER2, 1.7%, 5.1% in EGFR, 44.8%, 31.0% in c-MET and 31.0%, 29.3% in IGF-1R. The concordance between primary and paired liver metastatic sites were 91.3%, 93.1%, 75.8%, and 70.6%, respectively. Conclusions: Our data suggested that in HER2 and EGFR the concordance between primary and metastatic site were high, other hands the concordance of c-MET and IGF-1R were relatively low. It might be necessary to rebiopsy to estimate the expression of c-MET and IGF-1R in gastric cancer.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 51-51
Author(s):  
Shinsaku Honda ◽  
Yuichiro Miki ◽  
Yutaka Tanizawa ◽  
Wataru Takagi ◽  
Fumiko Hirata ◽  
...  

51 Background: Preoperative chemotherapy is thought to be an option for treatment of advanced gastric cancer. However, optimal predictive marker for survival of preoperative chemotherapy had not yet been established. Histological response is thought to be a good candidate of predictive marker, however, it had been determined only in primary tumor, not in the metastatic lymph node. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of histological response in metastatic lymph node on the survival in patients received preoperative chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Methods: A total of 38 patients who underwent curative resection after preoperative chemotherapy from were included. For histological evaluation in lymph node, we determined it as positive if remaining viable tumor cells are less than 30% of the tumor area at one or more of the resected metastatic lymph nodes. We also evaluated histological response in primary tumor according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Classification. Results: 21 patients received preoperative chemotherapy as planned neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and remaining 17 received chemotherapy as palliative intent and then converted to surgery. Pathological TNM stage was 0 in 2, I in 5, II in 13, III in 11, and IV in 7, respectively. In lymph node, histological response was able to evaluate in 31 of 38 patients. Among them, positive response was observed in 15 patients. Histological tumor response in primary tumor was grade 0 in 2, grade 1a in 10, grade 1b in 7, grade 2 in 10, and grade 3 in 2. The 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was significantly better in patients with positive histological response in lymph node (71 %) than in those without response (21 %) (p = 0.003). Similarly, 3-year RFS rate was significantly better in patients with histological response in primary tumor (grade 2, 3) (73 %) than in those without response (grade 0, 1a, 1b) (30 %) (p=0.007). Three-year RFS in patients who demonstrate histological response both in primary tumor and lymph node was as high as 89 %. Conclusions: Histological responses in lymph nodes, as well as primary tumor, appear to be a useful predictive marker for survival in patients underwent curative resection after preoperative chemotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document