scholarly journals The Impact of Successful Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Real World

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuhe Gong ◽  
Li Zhou ◽  
Xiaosong Ding ◽  
Hui Chen ◽  
Hongwei Li
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Real World ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Coronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs) are correlated with increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes. The optimal treatment strategy for CTO has not been well established. We sought to examine the impact of CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on long-term clinical outcome in the real world.Methods: A total of 592 consecutive patients with CTO in Beijing Friendship Hospital from June 2017 to December 2019 were enrolled, 29 patients were excluded due to Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). After exclusion, 563 patients were divided into the no-revascularized group (CTO-NR group, n=263) and successful revascularized group (CTO-R group, n=300). The primary endpoint was cardiac death; Secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, re-hospitalization, heart failure, and stroke.Results: Percent of Diabetes mellitus (53.2% vs 39.7), Chronic kidney disease (8.7% vs 3.7%), CABG history (7.6% vs 1%), three vessel disease(96.2% vs 90%) and left main coronary artery disease (25.1% vs 13.7%) was significantly higher in the CTO-NR group than in success PCI group (all P<0.05). Moreover, the CTO-NR group has lower EF (0.58±0.11 vs 0.61±0.1, p=0.001) and FS (0.31±0.07 vs 0.33±0.07, p=0.002). At a median follow-up of 12 months, CTO revascularization was superior to CTO no-revascularization in terms of cardiac death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.27, 95% conference interval [CI] 0.11-0.64). The superiority of CTO revascularization was consistent for MACCE (HR: 0.55, 95% CI 0.35-0.79). At multivariable Cox hazards regression analysis, CTO revascularization remains one of the independent predictors of lower risk of cardiac death and MACCE.Conclusions: Successful revascularization by PCI may bring more clinical benefits. The presence of LVEF＜0.5 and LM-disease was associated with an incidence of cardiac death; CTO revascularization was a protected predictor of cardiac death.

scholarly journals The Impact of Successful Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Real World

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuhe Gong ◽  
Li Zhou ◽  
Xiaosong Ding ◽  
Hui Chen ◽  
Hongwei Li
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Real World ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Total Occlusion ◽  
Chronic Total Occlusions ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Backgroud: Chronic total occlusions (CTOs) are an important and increasingly recognized subgroup of coronary lesions; the optimal treatment strategy for CTO has not been well established. We sought to examine the impact of CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on long-term clinical outcome in the real world.Methods: A total of 592 consecutive patients with CTO in Beijing Friendship Hospital from June 2017 to December 2019 were enrolled. 29 patients were excluded due to Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), 301 patients were revascularized by PCI (CTO-R group) and 262 were not revascularized (CTO-NR group). The primary endpoint was cardiac death; Secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, re-hospitalization, heart failure, and stroke. Results: Percent of Diabetes mellitus (53.4% vs 39.5), Chronic kidney disease (8.8% vs 3.7%), CABG history (7.6% vs 1%), three vessel disease(96.2% vs 90%) and LM disease(25.2% vs 13.6%) was significantly higher in the CTO-NR group than in success PCI group (all P<0.05). Moreover, the CTO-NR group has lower EF (0.58±0.11 vs 0.61±0.1, p=0.002) and FS (0.32±0.07 vs 0.33±0.07, p=0.003). At a median follow-up of 12 months, CTO-R was superior to CTO-NR in terms of cardiac death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.32, 95% conference interval [CI] 0.11-0.94). The superiority of CTO-R was consistent for MACCE (HR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.37-0.87). At multivariable Cox hazards regression analysis, CTO-R remains one of the independent predictors of lower risk of cardiac death and MACCE.Conclusions: Successful revascularization by PCI offered CTO patients more clinical benefits. The presence of LVEF＜0.5 and LM-disease was associated with an incidence of cardiac death; CTO revascularised was a protected predictor of cardiac death.

scholarly journals The Impact of Smoking on Clinical Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Women Compared to Men

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Seyyed Saeed Mohammadi ◽  
Mohammad Javad Zibaeenezhad ◽  
Mehrab Sayadi ◽  
Soorena Khorshidi ◽  
Ehsan Hadiyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Drug Eluting Stent ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
History Of ◽  
Stable Cad ◽  
The Impact

Background. For decades, cardiovascular diseases (CVD) have been known as men’s disease. However, recent research studies showed that they have become more common in women. Smoking is a strong risk factor for CVD especially that of coronary artery disease (CAD). Several studies reported that women are more susceptible to drastic sequels of smoking than men. There is limited data regarding the impact of smoking on post-revascularization clinical events stratified by gender. This study aimed to investigate if gender significantly changes the incidence of adverse clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among those with history of smoking. Methods. Participants were selected from two hospitals from 2003 to 2019. Among patients who had PCI (index PCI), those with stable CAD who underwent elective PCI were included. Exclusion criteria were defined as primary PCI and those with multiple prior revascularizations. Participants were followed up seeking for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including revascularization (PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting), myocardial infarction, and coronary death in three time intervals according to the time of index PCI (short term: up to 24 hours, mid-term: 24 hours to less than 6 months, and long term: more than 6 months). Results. Of the 1799 patients, 61% were men and 47.08% had history of smoking (75% of the smokers were men). At the time of index PCI, smokers were significantly younger than nonsmokers. Also, MACE were significantly higher in smokers than nonsmokers, which was particularly pronounced at the long-term interval. In the nonsmokers group, there was no difference in MACE occurrence between men and women. However, of the smokers, women showed significantly higher MACE rate compared with men peers. Conclusion. Smoking makes women more prone to MACE in comparison to men among patients with stable CAD after PCI with drug-eluting stent.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Diabetes and Multivessel or Left Main Disease – a Review

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Donald E Cutlip ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Bare Metal Stents ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
The Impact

Coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes is frequently a diffuse process with multivessel involvement and is associated with increased risk for myocardial infarction and death. The role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with diabetes and multivessel disease who require revascularisation has been debated and remains uncertain. The debate has been continued mainly because of the question to what degree an increased risk for in-stent restenosis among patients with diabetes contributes to other late adverse outcomes. This article reviews outcomes from early trials of balloon angioplasty versus CABG through later trials of bare-metal stents versus CABG and more recent data with drug-eluting stents as the comparator. Although not all studies have been powered to show statistical significance, the results have been generally consistent with a mortality benefit for CABG versus PCI, despite differential risks for restenosis with the various PCI approaches. The review also considers the impact of mammary artery grafting of the left anterior descending artery and individual case selection on these results, and proposes an algorithm for selection of patients in whom PCI remains a reasonable strategy.

scholarly journals Long-term impact of baseline anaemia on clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina

Open Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e001319
Author(s):  
Line Davidsen ◽  
Kristian Hay Kragholm ◽  
Mette Aldahl ◽  
Christoffer Polcwiartek ◽  
Christian Torp-Pedersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Stable Angina ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundIn patients with stable angina (SA), the clinical benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reside almost exclusively within the realm of symptomatic improvement rather than improvement in hard clinical endpoints. The benefits of PCI should always be balanced against its potential short-term and long-term risks. Common among these risks is the presence of anaemia and its interaction with poor clinical outcomes and increased morbidity; this study aims to elucidate the impact of anaemia on long-term clinical outcomes of this patient group.MethodsFrom Danish national registries, we identified patients with SA treated with PCI who had a haemoglobin measurement maximum of 90 days prior to PCI procedure. Anaemia was defined as haemoglobin <130 and <120 g/L in men and women, respectively. Follow-up was up to 3 years after PCI, and Cox regression was used to estimate HRs with 95% CIs of hospitalisation due to bleeding, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and all-cause mortality in patients with anaemia compared with patients without anaemia.ResultsOf 2837 included patients, 14.6% had anaemia prior to PCI. During follow-up, 93 patients (3.3%) had a bleeding episode, which was higher in patients with anaemia (5.8%) compared with patients without anaemia (2.8%). A total of 213 patients (7.5%) developed ACS, which was higher in patients with anaemia (10.6%) compared with patients without anaemia (7.0%). Furthermore, 185 patients (6.5%) died, with a mortality rate of 18.1% in patients with anaemia compared with 4.5% in patients without anaemia. In multivariable analyses, anaemia was associated with a significantly increased risk of bleeding (HR 1.69; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.73; P 0.033), ACS (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.10; P 0.031) and all-cause mortality (HR 2.41; 95% CI 1.73 to 3.30; P <0.001).ConclusionAnaemia in patients with SA was significantly associated with bleeding, ACS and all-cause mortality following PCI.

The Impact of Prior Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Long-Term Survival after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 940-945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley T. O’Neal ◽  
Jimmy T. Efird ◽  
Curtis A. Anderson ◽  
Linda C. Kindell ◽  
Jason B. O’Neal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Bypass Grafting ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
The Impact

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Diabetes and Multivessel or Left Main Disease—A Review

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-111
Author(s):  
Donald E Cutlip
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Bare Metal Stents ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Metal Stents ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
The Impact

Coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes is frequently a diffuse process with multivessel involvement and is associated with increased risk for myocardial infarction and death. The role of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with diabetes and multivessel disease who require revascularization has been debated and remains uncertain. The debate has been continued mainly because of the question to what degree an increased risk for in-stent restenosis among patients with diabetes contributes to other late adverse outcomes. This article reviews outcomes from early trials of balloon angioplasty versus CABG through later trials of bare-metal stents versus CABG and more recent data with drug-eluting stents as the comparator. although not all studies have been powered to show statistical significance, the results have been generally consistent with a mortality benefit for caBG versus PCI, despite differential risks for restenosis with the various PCI approaches. The review also considers the impact of mammary artery grafting of the left anterior descending artery and individual case selection on these results, and proposes an algorithm for selection of patients in whom PCI remains a reasonable strategy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document