TRANSPORT HELICOPTER OPERATING COST ANALYSIS METHODS

1955 ◽  
Author(s):  
HILLER AIRCRAFT CORP PALO ALTO CA
Author(s):  
Kevin J. Yost ◽  
Luke Chen ◽  
Zachary Adamson ◽  
Tommy Baudendistel ◽  
William Perdikakis ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 34-36
Author(s):  
John McLoughlin ◽  
Kathleen Hochbaum

Vehicles ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 691-720
Author(s):  
Shemin Sagaria ◽  
António Moreira ◽  
Fernanda Margarido ◽  
Patricia Baptista

Low vehicle occupancy rates combined with record conventional vehicle sales justify the requirement to optimize vehicle type based on passengers and a powertrain with zero-emissions. This study compares the performance of different vehicle types based on the number of passengers/payloads, powertrain configuration (battery and fuel cell electric configurations), and drive cycles, to assess range and energy consumption. An adequate choice of vehicle segment according to the real passenger occupancy enables the least energy consumption. Vehicle performance in terms of range points to remarkable results for the FCEV (fuel cell electric vehicle) compared to BEV (battery electric vehicle), where the former reached an average range of 600 km or more in all different drive cycles, while the latter was only cruising nearly 350 km. Decisively, the cost analysis indicated that FCEV remains the most expensive option with base cost three-fold that of BEV. The FCEV showed notable results with an average operating cost of less than 7 cents/km, where BEV cost more than 10 €/km in addition to the base cost for light-duty vehicles. The cost analysis for a bus and semi-truck showed that with a full payload, FCPT (fuel cell powertrain) would be more economical with an average energy cost of ~1.2 €/km, while with BPT the energy cost is more than 300 €/km.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document