Comparison of variants of anesthesia for left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fbrillation

Objective: comparison of general anesthesia (GA) and intravenous conscious sedation during left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO).Materials and Methods. The study included 120 patients from LAAO Register at the National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, who were divided into GA (n = 100) and intravenous sedation (n = 20) groups. In-hospital outcomes were assessed, as well as outcomes and data of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) at 45 days and 6 months.Results. 3 patients required intraoperative conversion of the anesthetic method to GA. The duration of the procedure, the time of ﬂuoroscopy, the amount of contrast medium, and the technical success did not diﬀer signifcantly between the two groups. The incidence of in-hospital complications in the GA group was 10%, and 15% in the intravenous sedation group (p = 0.453). There were no statistically signifcant diﬀerences between the groups in long-term outcomes and TEE data after 45 days and 6 months.Conclusion. Combined intravenous sedation with local anesthesia is an eﬀective and fairly safe method of anesthesiological support for implantation of the occluder of the left atrial auricle. It can be used in patients with a high risk of GA, with predictable difculties of tracheal intubation, as well as if the patient wishes accordingly. The limitations of the use of intravenous sedation in combination with local anesthesia are anatomical variants of SFM that are difcult for occluder implantation, as well as the patient's low tolerance to ECG in consciousness.

Download Full-text

Long-term outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and left atrial appendage closure in a large UK tertiary centre: 10-year experience

EP Europace ◽

10.1093/europace/euab116.283 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽

Author(s):

A Briosa E Gala ◽

MTB Pope ◽

C Monteiro ◽

M Leo ◽

TR Betts

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Left Atrial ◽

Left Atrial Appendage ◽

Bleeding Risk ◽

Atrial Appendage ◽

Tertiary Centre ◽

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a well-established stroke prevention strategy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and high risk of bleeding or contra-indication to oral anticoagulation (OAC). Despite encouraging randomised control trial and international registry safety and efficacy data, long-term outcome data remains sparce. Purpose This study sought to evaluate the long-term outcomes in ‘real-world’ AF patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion in a large UK tertiary centre. Methods This retrospective study included all patients that had a LAAO device implanted in our institution from January 2010 to December 2020. Medical notes, electronic patient records, procedural and imaging reports were reviewed. Annual bleeding risk was extrapolated from the Swedish National Cohort study according to CHA2DS2-VASc and HASBLED score. Results During the study period a total of 225 patients underwent LAAO device implant. Seventy-two percent were male, age 74 ± 8 years, BMI 27 ± 6 kg/m2, CHA2DS2-VASc score 4.4 ± 1.2, HASBLED score 3.2 ± 0.8 and at high risk of stroke (98 ischaemic strokes and 129 haemorrhagic strokes) and bleeding (151 life-threatening bleeding episodes). Three different LAAO devices were used: 136 Watchman, 54 Watchman FLX and 35 Amplatzer Cardiac plugs. Three patients (1.3%) had fatal complications related to the procedure. At discharge, 10% were taking single antiplatelet (ATP), 79% dual-antiplatelet (DAPT), 1.4% OAC, 3.6% ATP and OAC, 3.1% DAPT and OAC, 1.3% were not taking any anti-thrombotic. Nine (4%) patients had device-related thrombus on follow-up transoesophageal echocardiography with no significant difference between devices (5.0%, 2.8% and 6.7% p = 0.8, respectively) and anticoagulation strategy (p = 0.7). Over a total follow-up of 889 patient-years (mean follow-up 3.9 ± 3.7 years), 24 (10.4%) patients died, 55 patients (6.2/100 patient-years) suffered an adverse event, 15 ischaemic strokes (1.7/100 patient-years) and 20 non-procedural major bleeding episodes (2.3/100 patient-years) occurred. Compared to estimated annual stroke and bleeding risk adjusted for CHA2DS2-VASc and HASBLED score, our cohort had a 79% and 65% relative risk reduction in ischaemic stroke and major bleeding, respectively. Conclusion In this cohort of "real-world" high-risk patients, major bleeding and thromboembolic rate remained low on long-term follow-up. Abstract Figure 1

Download Full-text

Evaluating long-term outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion: the results of a prospective single-center registry

EP Europace ◽

10.1093/europace/euab116.287 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽

Author(s):

M Maarse ◽

L Wintgens ◽

E Aarnink ◽

M Huijboom ◽

B Abeln ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Left Atrial ◽

Left Atrial Appendage ◽

Atrial Appendage ◽

Left Atrial Appendage Closure ◽

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion ◽

Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by an unrestricted grant from Boston Scientific. Boston Scientific was not involved in the design/conduct of the study, data collection/analysis and interpretation of the data and preparation of the manuscript. Background Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion is an emerging alternative to anticoagulation in the prevention for stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, especially in patients with a contra-indication for oral anticoagulation therapy. Long-term results on the efficacy and safety of this treatment remain scarce. Methods In this single-center prospective registry, data of all consecutive patients that underwent percutaneous left atrial appendage closure between 2009 and 2019 were collected. Patients with successful left atrial appendage closure (peri-device leakage ≤5mm) and at least one year of follow-up data were analyzed. The occurrence of thrombo-embolic events (ischemic stroke, TIA and systemic embolism), major bleeding events (BARC >2) and anticoagulation use during long-term follow-up were evaluated. Results A total of 192 patients after left atrial appendage occlusion were included (61 % male, age 69.0 ± 8.4 years, CHA2DS2-VASc 4.0[3.0-5.0], HAS-BLED 3.0[2.0-3.25]) with a mean follow-up duration of 5.7 ± 2.8 years (in total 1087 patient-years). During follow-up 36 patients (19%) died. 49 thrombo-embolic complications were observed in 38 patients. The ischemic stroke rate was 1.9 events per 100 patient-years, accounting for a 70% reduction compared to CHA2DS2-VASc predicted rate. Device-related thrombus (DRT) occurred in 5 patients (2.6%), 3 were observed during routine follow-up and were not associated with thrombo-embolic complications. The other 2 DRT were observed in patients presenting with ischemic stroke more than 3 years after device implantation. Furthermore, 38 non-procedural major bleeding complications occurred in 19 patients, resulting in 3.5 events per 100-patients years, accounting for a reduction of 43% compared to estimated bleeding rates under OAC use. At the end of the study 71% of all patients were on single antiplatelet or no antiplatelet/anticoagulation treatment at all. Conclusions During long-term follow-up thrombo-embolic event rates and non-procedural major bleeding rates were consistently low (ischemic stroke rate reduction 70% and non-procedural major bleeding rate reduction 40% compared to predicted rates). These results confirm the efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion. Abstract Figure. Ischemic stroke rates

Download Full-text