Exploring the determinants of leisure activity for baby boomers : By applying Poisson model and negative binomial model

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 135-147
Author(s):  
Heungryel Kim
1985 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward F. Vonesh

Recurrent peritonitis is a major complication of Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD). As a therapy for patients with end stage renal disease, CAPD entails a continuous interaction between patient and various medical devices. The assumptions one makes regarding this interaction play an essential role when estimating the rate of recurrent peritonitis for a given patient population. Assuming that each patient has a constant rate of peritonitis, two models for evaluating the risk of recurrent peritonitis are considered. One model, the Poisson probability model, applies when the rate of peritonitis is the same from patient to patient. When this occurs, the frequency of peritoneal infections will be randomly distributed among patients (Corey, 1981). A second model, the negative binomial probability model, applies when the rate of peritonitis varies from one patient to another. In this event, the distribution of peritoneal infections will differ from patient to patient. The poisson model would be applicable when, for example, patients behave similarly with respect to their interactions with the medical devices and with potential risk factors. The negative binomial model, on the other hand, makes allowances for patient differences both in terms of their handling of routine exchanges and in their exposure to various risk factors. This paper provides methods for estimating the mean peritonitis rate under each model. In addition, “survival” curve estimates depicting the probability of remaining peritonitis free (i.e. “surviving”) over time are provided. It is shown, using data from a multi-center clinical trial, that the risk of peritonitis is best described in terms of survival curves rather than the mean peritonitis rate. For both models, the mean peritonitis rate was found to be 0.85 episodes per year. However, under the negative binomial model, the one-year survival rate, expressed as the percentage of patients remaining free of peritonitis, is 52% as compared with only 42% under the Poisson model. Moreover, the negative binomial model provided a significantly better fit to the observed frequency of peritonitis. These findings suggest that the negative binomial model provides a more realistic and accurate portrayal of the risk of peritonitis and that this risk is not nearly as high as would otherwise be indicated by a Poisson analysis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Xin Xu ◽  
Dongxiao Chu

Getting medical services has become more difficult and expensive in China, which led to a problem of illness not being treated and a large number of zeros in the statistics of being hospitalized for the elderly. Traditional classic models such as the Poisson model and the negative binomial model cannot fit this kind of data well. One aim of this study was to use zero-inflated and hurdle models to better solve the problem of excess zeros. Another aim was to discover the factors affecting the decision-making behavior of the elderly being hospitalized and hospitalization service utilization. Therefore, the XGBoost model was firstly introduced to rank the importance of influencing factors in this paper. It was found that the zero-inflated negative binomial model performed best. The results showed that the elderly who had enjoyed NRCM or ERBMI/URBMI were more likely to have a higher number of hospitalizations. This indicated that the high cost of hospitalization had prevented the willingness of the elderly being hospitalized, but the basic medical insurance had increased the times of their repeated hospital readmissions. Policy efforts should be made to improve the level of basic medical insurance.


2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edilson Marcelino Silva ◽  
Thais Destefani Ribeiro Furtado ◽  
Jaqueline Gonçalves Fernandes ◽  
Marcelo Ângelo Cirillo ◽  
Joel Augusto Muniz

ABSTRACT: Coffee crops play an important role in Brazilian agriculture, with a high level of social and economic participation resulting from the jobs created in the supply chain and from the income obtained by producers and the revenue generated for the country from coffee bean export. In coffee plant growth, leaves have a determinant role in higher production; therefore, the leaf count per plant provides relevant information to producers for adequate crop management, such as foliar fertilizer applications. To describe count data, the Poisson model is the most commonly employed model; when count data show overdispersion, the negative binomial model has been determined to be more adequate. The objective of this study was to compare the fitness of the Poisson and negative binomial models to data on the leaf count per plant in coffee seedlings. Data were collected from an experiment with a randomized block design with 30 treatments and three replicates and four plants per plot. Data from only one treatment, in which the number of leaves was counted over time, were employed. The first count was conducted on 8 April 2016, and the other counts were performed 18, 32, 47, 62, 76, 95, 116, 133, and 153 days after the first evaluation, for a total of ten measurements. The fitness of the models was assessed based on deviance values and simulated envelopes for residuals. Results of fitness assessment indicated that the Poisson model was inadequate for describing the data due to overdispersion. The negative binomial model adequately fitted the observations and was indicated to describe the number of leaves of coffee plants. Based on the negative binomial model, the expected relative increase in the number of leaves was 0.9768% per day.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eghbal Zandkarimi ◽  
Abbas Moghimbeigi ◽  
Hossein Mahjub ◽  
Reza Majdzadeh

2021 ◽  
Vol 300 ◽  
pp. 113919
Author(s):  
Narimasa Kumagai ◽  
Aran Tajika ◽  
Akio Hasegawa ◽  
Nao Kawanishi ◽  
Hirokazu Fujita ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 525-534
Author(s):  
Bisrat Misganew Geremew ◽  
Kassahun Alemu Gelaye ◽  
Alemakef Wagnew Melesse ◽  
Temesgen Yihunie Akalu ◽  
Adhanom Gebreegziabher Baraki

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document