scholarly journals ‘Missing out’? The potential consequences of inaccurate teacher expectations on young gifted readers’ achievement outcomes

Apex ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynda Garrett ◽  
Christine Rubie-Davies ◽  
Mohamed Alansari ◽  
Elizabeth Peterson ◽  
Annaline Flint ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-82
Author(s):  
Lana Apple ◽  
Mira Debs

PISA test data from 2000 to today have shown Germany’s education system is one of the most inequitable within the OECD, with high correlations between student background and achievement outcomes. Scholars have identified the highly differentiated school structure, which tracks students as young as 10 years old, as a central cause. This scholarship has not evaluated why German tracking has proved difficult to reform over the last 20 years, despite evidence of negative outcomes. Using a case study of parents’ actions in Hamburg, this paper employs a discourse analysis of debates surrounding a tracking reform to argue that opportunity hoarding—that is, parents with more social capital maintaining certain advantages through ingrained systems that are theoretically open to all—may contribute to why Germany’s early tracking system persists despite evidence showing that it increases educational inequality. The findings presented have implications for an international discussion of tracking reform and opportunity hoarding.


AERA Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 233285842098621
Author(s):  
Marta Pellegrini ◽  
Cynthia Lake ◽  
Amanda Neitzel ◽  
Robert E. Slavin

This article reviews research on the achievement outcomes of elementary mathematics programs; 87 rigorous experimental studies evaluated 66 programs in grades K–5. Programs were organized in six categories. Particularly positive outcomes were found for tutoring programs (effect size [ES] = +0.20, k = 22). Positive outcomes were also seen in studies focused on professional development for classroom organization and management (e.g., cooperative learning; ES = +0.19, k = 7). Professional development approaches focused on helping teachers gain in understanding of mathematics content and pedagogy had little impact on student achievement. Professional development intended to help in the adoption of new curricula had a small but significant impact for traditional (nondigital) curricula (ES = +0.12, k = 7), but not for digital curricula. Traditional and digital curricula with limited professional development, as well as benchmark assessment programs, found few positive effects.


1994 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela A. Hadley ◽  
Kim A. Wilcox ◽  
Mabel L. Rice

1982 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Schloss ◽  
Sidney R. Miller

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document