Weed and Brush Control for Range Improvement

2015 ◽  
pp. 55-74
Author(s):  
H. L. Morton
Keyword(s):  
Brush Control

Brush Control and Pasture Development in the Red Plains 1

1950 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 390-394
Author(s):  
Harry M. Elwell ◽  
Harley A. Daniel ◽  
Maurice B. Cox
Keyword(s):  
Brush Control

scholarly journals Brush Control and Rio Grande Turkeys in North-Central Texas

1980 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Dee A. Quinton ◽  
Alan Kent Montei ◽  
Jerran T. Flinders
Keyword(s):  
Rio Grande ◽  
North Central ◽  
North Central Texas ◽  
Central Texas ◽  
Brush Control

scholarly journals Policy Prospects for Brush Control to Increase Off-Site Water Yield

2000 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. L. Thurow ◽  
A. P. Thurow ◽  
M. D. Garriga
Keyword(s):  
Water Yield ◽  
Site Water ◽  
Brush Control

Brush Control on Forest-Rangelands in East Texas

1970 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 129 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Meyer ◽  
H. L. Morton ◽  
M. G. Merkle ◽  
R. W. Bovey ◽  
F. S. Davis
Keyword(s):  
East Texas ◽  
Brush Control

scholarly journals TECHNOLOGICAL APPROACHES FOR SANITARY PROCESSING OF FOOTWEAR AND CLOTHES OF LIVESTOCK WORKERS

2021 ◽  
pp. 130-140
Author(s):  
Anatoliy Paliy ◽  
Andriy Paliy ◽  
K. V. Ishchenko K. V. ◽  
S. A. Mikhalchenko
Keyword(s):  
Branch Pipe ◽  
Animal Husbandry ◽  
Effective Control ◽  
Control Panel ◽  
Start Button ◽  
Disinfectant Solution ◽  
Brush Control ◽  
Livestock Products ◽  
High Level ◽  
Cleaning And Disinfection

Effective control of the quality and safety of livestock products is possible only with the implementation of a scientifically grounded complex of veterinary and sanitary and general economic measures. The goal of our work was to develop effective ways to sanitize clothing and footwear of workers in the livestock industry. The studies were carried out following the current methodological approaches that are used in agriculture and veterinary medicine. Based on the results of the research carried out, two methods and one device have been developed to ensure a high level of veterinary and sanitary measures in animal husbandry. It has been proven that for the sanitization of clothing of workers in the animal husbandry industry, it is effective to use a disinfectant, which includes the sodium salt of dichloroisocyanuric acid (0.09–0.36%), adipic acid (0.01–0.04%), sodium bicarbonate (0.01–0.04%), sodium carbonate (0.003–0.01%), water (99.887–99.55%) when exposed for 30 minutes. For disinfection of workers' footwear, it is advisable to use disinfectants filled with a disinfectant that contains dichlorantin (0.021–0.21%), 5,5-dimethylhydantoin (0.0164–0.164%), a dispersant (0.012–0.12%), anionic surfactants (0.005–0.05%), corrosion inhibitor (0.01–0.1%), filler (0.0356–0.356%) and water (99.9–99.0%). An innovative device for cleaning and disinfection is proposed - a shoe disinfector, which consists of a waterproof box with a bottom wider than the top, filled with a disinfectant solution, a branch pipe for removing waste solution, a brush shaft, which is fixed in the upper part of the waterproof box, an electric motor with a rotational speed 2 rev/s., Which serves as a drive shaft brush, control panel with a start button and a stop button. The proposed developments complement the existing regulations on veterinary and sanitary measures at livestock farms and complexes.

Deer Foods and Brush Control in Southern Arizona

1972 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Clay Y. McCulloch
Keyword(s):  
Brush Control

New Developments in Chemical Brush Control in Arkansas

1957 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hurlon Ray
Keyword(s):  
New Developments ◽  
Brush Control

Range Forage Production and Consumption Following Aerial Spraying of Mixed Brush

Weed Science ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.J. Scifres ◽  
G.P. Durham ◽  
J.L. Mutz
Keyword(s):  
South Texas ◽  
Forage Production ◽  
Direct Function ◽  
Native Grass ◽  
The Third ◽  
Production And Consumption ◽  
Anisic Acid ◽  
Use Efficiency ◽  
Second Year ◽  
Brush Control

Production of native grasses following aerial application of 1.12 kg/ha of 2.4.5-T ((2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)acetic acid), 2,4,5-T + dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid), or 2,4,5-T + picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid) (1:) to a south Texas mixed-brush (Prosopis-Acacia) community was significantly increased by all herbicide treatments the year of application, by the herbicide combinations during the second year, but only by 2,4,5-T + picloram the third year after treatment. Moisture-use efficiency based on kg/ha native grass produced/cm precipitation was greastest where the herbicide combinations were applied. Defoliation of woody plants in years of above-average rainfall resulted in favorable grass production responses regardless of herbicide(s). However, range improvement over the 3-yr of study was dependent on maintenance of herbicide effectiveness, especially control of underbrush which resulted only where 2,4,5-T + picloram were applied. Consumption of native grass was a direct function of availability in response to brush control as augmented by rainfall. Forb production was reduced by all herbicides the year of treatment and by 2,4,5-T + picloram the year following application, but was not reduced by any treatment during the third growing season.

scholarly journals Verification of a Methodology for Targeting Brush Control to Maximize Water Yield Through Hydrologic Modeling

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason D. Afinowicz ◽  
Clyde L. Munster ◽  
Bradford P. Wilcox
Keyword(s):  
Hydrologic Modeling ◽  
Water Yield ◽  
Brush Control

Nitrate Dynamics Following Brush Control in a Post Oak‐Blackjack Oak Forest

1996 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 536-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Gay ◽  
Earl R. Allen ◽  
David M. Engle ◽  
Jimmy F. Stritzke
Keyword(s):  
Oak Forest ◽  
Post Oak ◽  
Brush Control
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document