Proposal for Keeping Abreast of Soil Taxonomy Issues

Soil Horizons ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Bob Grossman
Keyword(s):  
1980 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-15
Author(s):  
Kenneth L. White
Keyword(s):  

Soil Horizons ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
John Doe
Keyword(s):  

Land ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena A. Mikhailova ◽  
Hamdi A. Zurqani ◽  
Christopher J. Post ◽  
Mark A. Schlautman ◽  
Gregory C. Post

Soil ecosystem services (ES) (e.g., provisioning, regulation/maintenance, and cultural) and ecosystem disservices (ED) are dependent on soil diversity/pedodiversity (variability of soils), which needs to be accounted for in the economic analysis and business decision-making. The concept of pedodiversity (biotic + abiotic) is highly complex and can be broadly interpreted because it is formed from the interaction of atmospheric diversity (abiotic + biotic), biodiversity (biotic), hydrodiversity (abiotic + biotic), and lithodiversity (abiotic) within ecosphere and anthroposphere. Pedodiversity is influenced by intrinsic (within the soil) and extrinsic (outside soil) factors, which are also relevant to ES/ED. Pedodiversity concepts and measures may need to be adapted to the ES framework and business applications. Currently, there are four main approaches to analyze pedodiversity: taxonomic (diversity of soil classes), genetic (diversity of genetic horizons), parametric (diversity of soil properties), and functional (soil behavior under different uses). The objective of this article is to illustrate the application of pedodiversity concepts and measures to value ES/ED with examples based on the contiguous United States (U.S.), its administrative units, and the systems of soil classification (e.g., U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Taxonomy, Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database). This study is based on a combination of original research and literature review examples. Taxonomic pedodiversity in the contiguous U.S. exhibits high soil diversity, with 11 soil orders, 65 suborders, 317 great groups, 2026 subgroups, and 19,602 series. The ranking of “soil order abundance” (area of each soil order within the U.S.) expressed as the proportion of the total area is: (1) Mollisols (27%), (2) Alfisols (17%), (3) Entisols (14%), (4) Inceptisols and Aridisols (11% each), (5) Spodosols (3%), (6) Vertisols (2%), and (7) Histosols and Andisols (1% each). Taxonomic, genetic, parametric, and functional pedodiversity are an essential context for analyzing, interpreting, and reporting ES/ED within the ES framework. Although each approach can be used separately, three of these approaches (genetic, parametric, and functional) fall within the “umbrella” of taxonomic pedodiversity, which separates soils based on properties important to potential use. Extrinsic factors play a major role in pedodiversity and should be accounted for in ES/ED valuation based on various databases (e.g., National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) databases). Pedodiversity is crucial in identifying soil capacity (pedocapacity) and “hotspots” of ES/ED as part of business decision making to provide more sustainable use of soil resources. Pedodiversity is not a static construct but is highly dynamic, and various human activities (e.g., agriculture, urbanization) can lead to soil degradation and even soil extinction.


1989 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter F. Fisher ◽  
Chandra S. Balachandran

CATENA ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 83-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoomeh Sarmast ◽  
Mohammad Hady Farpoor ◽  
Isa Esfandiarpour Boroujeni
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Z. Shi ◽  
D. S. Yu ◽  
E. D. Warner ◽  
W. X. Sun ◽  
G. W. Petersen ◽  
...  

Soil Research ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 189 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Shirsath ◽  
T. Bhattacharyya ◽  
D. K. Pal

From a significant positive correlation between linear extensibility (LE) and the smectite content in the soil control section (SCS) of 8 soils (2 red soils, Alfisols, and 6 black soils, Vertisols, and their intergrades), the present study indicates an excellent compatibility between the marked shrink–swell characteristics and the smectitic mineralogy. The initiation of vertic properties at LE of 6 in shrink–swell soils corresponded to a minimum threshold value of 20% smectite. In order to highlight the inherent relationship between vertic properties and the swelling minerals, the mineralogy class for shrink–swell soils in US Soil Taxonomy should be only smectitic.


2014 ◽  
pp. 317-320
Author(s):  
James G. Bockheim
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document