Predicting Bulk Soil Electrical Conductivity versus Saturation Paste Extract Electrical Conductivity Calibrations from Soil Properties1

1981 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Rhoades
Soil Research ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 515 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Vogeler ◽  
B. E. Clothier ◽  
S. R. Green

In order to examine whether the electrolyte concentration in the soil solution can be estimated by time domain reflectometry (TDR) measured bulk soil electrical conductivity, column leaching experiments were performed using undisturbed soil columns during unsaturated steady-state water flow. The leaching experiments were carried out on 2 soils with contrasting pedological structure. One was the strongly structured Ramiha silt loam, and the other the weakly structured Manawatu fine sandy loam. Transport parameters obtained from the effluent data were used to predict the transient pattern in the resident electrolyte concentration measured by TDR. The electrolyte concentration was inferred from the TDR-measured bulk soil electrical conductivity using 2 different calibration approaches: one resulting from continuous solute application, and the other by direct calibration. Prior to these, calibration on repacked soil columns related TDR measurements to both the volumetric water content and the electrolyte concentration that is resident in the soil solution. The former calibration technique could be used successfully to describe solute transport in both soils, but without predicting the absolute levels of solute. The direct calibration method only provided good estimates of the resident concentration, or electrolyte concentration, in the strongly structured top layer of the Ramiha soil. This soil possessed no immobile water. For the less-structured layer of the Ramiha, and the weakly structured Manawatu soil, only crude approximations of the solute concentration in the soil were found, with measurement errors of up to 50%. The small-scale pattern of electrolyte movement of these weakly structured soils appears to be quite complex.


1988 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 715-722 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. KACHANOSKI ◽  
I. J. VAN WESENBEECK ◽  
E. G. GREGORICH

The relationships among the spatial variations of soil water content, soil texture, soil solution electrical conductivity, and bulk soil electrical conductivity were examined for a field characterized by net drainage and low concentrations of dissolved electrolytes. Bulk soil electrical conductivity was measured over various depths at 52 locations within a 1.8-ha field using noncontacting electromagnetic inductive meters. Soil water content (0–0.5 m depth) was measured at the same locations using the time domain reflectometry method. Measurements of soil texture and soil solution conductivity were obtained from core samples from 37 of the sampling locations. Soil water content at the site ranged from 0.06 to 0.36 m3 m−3. Clay content ranged from 2.5 to 44% percent and bulk soil electrical conductivity ranged from 0.0 to 0.21 S m−1. Significant correlation existed among almost all of the measured variables. Regression analysis indicated soil solution conductivity had no effect on measured bulk soil electrical conductivity for soil water contents less than 0.25 m3 m−3. Bulk soil electrical conductivity explained 96% of the spatial variation of soil water content independent of a wide range of soil texture. Autocorrelations of soil water content were similar to autocorrelations for bulk soil electrical conductivity. Under conditions similar to those in the study area, it should be possible to infer spatial variations in soil water content quickly by measuring bulk electrical conductivity using noncontacting electromagnetic inductive meters. Key words: Spatial variability, soil water, electrical conductivity, soil texture


2012 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 20-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaobing Zhou ◽  
Venkata R. Lakkaraju ◽  
Martha Apple ◽  
Laura M. Dobeck ◽  
Kadie Gullickson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document