scholarly journals The Texas Soil Observation Network:A Comprehensive Soil Moisture Dataset for Remote Sensing and Land Surface Model Validation

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd G. Caldwell ◽  
Tara Bongiovanni ◽  
Michael H. Cosh ◽  
Thomas J. Jackson ◽  
Andreas Colliander ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaxin Tian ◽  
Jun Qin ◽  
Kun Yang

<p>Soil moisture plays a key role in land surface processes. Both remote sensing and model simulation have their respective limitations in the estimation of soil moisture on a large spatial scale. Data assimilation is a promising way to merge remote sensing observation and land surface model (LSM), thus having a potential to acquire more accurate soil moisture. Two mainstream assimilation algorithms (variational-based and sequential-based) both need model and observation uncertainties due to their great impact on assimilation results. Besides, as far as land surface models are concerned, model parameters have a significant implication for simulation. However, how to specify these two uncertainties and parameters has been confusing for a long time. A dual-cycle assimilation algorithm, which consists of two cycles, is proposed for addressing the above issue. In the outer cycle, a cost function is constructed and minimized to estimate model parameters and uncertainties in both model and observation. In the inner cycle, a sequentially based filtering method is implemented to estimate soil moisture with the parameters and uncertainties estimated in the outer cycle. For the illustration of the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm, the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer of earth Observing System (AMSR-E) brightness temperatures are assimilated into land surface model with a radiative transfer model as the observation operator in three experimental fields, including Naqu and Ngari on the Tibetan Plateau, and Coordinate Enhanced Observing (CEOP) reference site on Mongolia. The results indicate that the assimilation algorithm can significantly improve soil moisture estimation.</p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime Gaona ◽  
Pere Quintana-Seguí ◽  
Maria José Escorihuela

<p>The Mediterranean climate of the Iberian Peninsula defines high spatial and temporal variability of drought at multiple scales. These droughts impact human activities such as water management, agriculture or forestry, and may alter valuable natural ecosystems as well. An accurate understanding and monitoring of drought processes are crucial in this area. The HUMID project (CGL2017-85687-R) is studying how remote sensing data and models (Quintana-Seguí et al., 2019; Barella-Ortiz and Quintana-Seguí, 2019) can improve our current knowledge on Iberian droughts, in general, and in the Ebro basin, more specifically.</p><p>The traditional ground-based monitoring of drought lacks the spatial resolution needed to identify the microclimatic mechanisms of drought at sub-basin scale, particularly when considering relevant variables for drought such as soil moisture and evapotranspiration. In situ data of these two variables is very scarce.</p><p>The increasing availability of remote sensing products such as MODIS16 A2 ET and the high-resolution SMOS 1km facilitates the use of distributed observations for the analysis of drought patterns across scales. The data is used to generate standardized drought indexes: the soil moisture deficit index (SMDI) based on SMOS 1km data (2010-2019) and the evapotranspiration deficit index (ETDI) based on MODIS16 A2 ET 500m. The study aims to identify the spatio-temporal mechanisms of drought generation, propagation and mitigation within the Ebro River basin and sub-basins, located in NE Spain where dynamic Atlantic, Mediterranean and Continental climatic influences dynamically mix, causing a large heterogeneity in climates.</p><p>Droughts in the 10-year period 2010-2019 of study exhibit spatio-temporal patterns at synoptic and mesoscale scales. Mesoscale spatio-temporal patterns prevail for the SMDI while the ETDI ones show primarily synoptic characteristics. The study compares the patterns of drought propagation identified with remote sensing data with the patterns estimated using the land surface model SURFEX-ISBA at 5km.  The comparison provides further insights about the capabilities and limitations of both tools, while emphasizes the value of combining approaches to improve our understanding about the complexity of drought processes across scales.</p><p>Additionally, the periods of quick change of drought indexes comprise valuable information about the response of evapotranspiration to water deficits as well as on the resilience of soil to evaporative stress. The lag analysis ranges from weeks to seasons. Results show lags between the ETDI and SMDI ranging from days to weeks depending on the precedent drought status and the season/month of drought’s generation or mitigation. The comparison of the lags observed on remote sensing data and land surface model data aims at evaluating the adequacy of the data sources and the indexes to represent the nonlinear interaction between soil moisture and evapotranspiration. This aspect is particularly relevant for developing drought monitoring aiming at managing the impact of drought in semi-arid environments and improving the adaptation to drought alterations under climate change.</p>


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 1293-1302 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tugrul Yilmaz ◽  
Wade T. Crow

Abstract Triple collocation analysis (TCA) enables estimation of error variances for three or more products that retrieve or estimate the same geophysical variable using mutually independent methods. Several statistical assumptions regarding the statistical nature of errors (e.g., mutual independence and orthogonality with respect to the truth) are required for TCA estimates to be unbiased. Even though soil moisture studies commonly acknowledge that these assumptions are required for an unbiased TCA, no study has specifically investigated the degree to which errors in existing soil moisture datasets conform to these assumptions. Here these assumptions are evaluated both analytically and numerically over four extensively instrumented watershed sites using soil moisture products derived from active microwave remote sensing, passive microwave remote sensing, and a land surface model. Results demonstrate that nonorthogonal and error cross-covariance terms represent a significant fraction of the total variance of these products. However, the overall impact of error cross correlation on TCA is found to be significantly larger than the impact of nonorthogonal errors. Because of the impact of cross-correlated errors, TCA error estimates generally underestimate the true random error of soil moisture products.


2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 3515-3532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clement Albergel ◽  
Emanuel Dutra ◽  
Simon Munier ◽  
Jean-Christophe Calvet ◽  
Joaquin Munoz-Sabater ◽  
...  

Abstract. The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) recently released the first 7-year segment of its latest atmospheric reanalysis: ERA-5 over the period 2010–2016. ERA-5 has important changes relative to the former ERA-Interim atmospheric reanalysis including higher spatial and temporal resolutions as well as a more recent model and data assimilation system. ERA-5 is foreseen to replace ERA-Interim reanalysis and one of the main goals of this study is to assess whether ERA-5 can enhance the simulation performances with respect to ERA-Interim when it is used to force a land surface model (LSM). To that end, both ERA-5 and ERA-Interim are used to force the ISBA (Interactions between Soil, Biosphere, and Atmosphere) LSM fully coupled with the Total Runoff Integrating Pathways (TRIP) scheme adapted for the CNRM (Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques) continental hydrological system within the SURFEX (SURFace Externalisée) modelling platform of Météo-France. Simulations cover the 2010–2016 period at half a degree spatial resolution. The ERA-5 impact on ISBA LSM relative to ERA-Interim is evaluated using remote sensing and in situ observations covering a substantial part of the land surface storage and fluxes over the continental US domain. The remote sensing observations include (i) satellite-driven model estimates of land evapotranspiration, (ii) upscaled ground-based observations of gross primary production, (iii) satellite-derived estimates of surface soil moisture and (iv) satellite-derived estimates of leaf area index (LAI). The in situ observations cover (i) soil moisture, (ii) turbulent heat fluxes, (iii) river discharges and (iv) snow depth. ERA-5 leads to a consistent improvement over ERA-Interim as verified by the use of these eight independent observations of different land status and of the model simulations forced by ERA-5 when compared with ERA-Interim. This is particularly evident for the land surface variables linked to the terrestrial hydrological cycle, while variables linked to vegetation are less impacted. Results also indicate that while precipitation provides, to a large extent, improvements in surface fields (e.g. large improvement in the representation of river discharge and snow depth), the other atmospheric variables play an important role, contributing to the overall improvements. These results highlight the importance of enhanced meteorological forcing quality provided by the new ERA-5 reanalysis, which will pave the way for a new generation of land-surface developments and applications.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacopo Dari ◽  
Pere Quintana-Seguí ◽  
María José Escorihuela ◽  
Luca Brocca ◽  
Renato Morbidelli ◽  
...  

<p>Irrigation practices introduce imbalances in the natural hydrological cycle at different spatial scales and put pressure on water resources, especially under climate changing and population increasing scenarios. Despite the implications of irrigation on food production and on the rational management of the available freshwater, detailed information about the areas where irrigation actually occurs is still lacking. For this reason, the comprehensive knowledge of the dynamics of the hydrological cycle over agricultural areas is often tricky.</p><p>The first aim of this study is to evaluate the capability of five remote sensing soil moisture data sets to detect the irrigation signal over an intensely irrigated area located within the Ebro river basin, in the North of Spain, during the biennium 2016-2017. As a second objective, a methodology to map the irrigated areas through the K-means clustering algorithm is proposed. The remotely sensed soil moisture products used in this study are: SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity) at 1 km, SMAP (Soil Moisture Active Passive) at 1 km and 9 km, Sentinel-1 at 1 km and ASCAT (Advanced SCATterometer) at 12.5 km. The 1 km versions of SMOS and SMAP are DISPATCH (DISaggregation based on Physical And Theoretical scale CHange) downscaled versions of the corresponding coarser resolution products. An additional data set of soil moisture simulated by the SURFEX-ISBA (<em>Surface Externalisée - Interaction Sol Biosphère Atmosphère</em>) land surface model is used as a support for the performed analyses.</p><p>The capability of soil moisture products to detect irrigation has been investigated by exploiting indices representing the spatial and temporal dynamics of soil moisture. The L-band passive microwave downscaled products, especially SMAP at 1 km, result the best performing ones in detecting the irrigation signal over the pilot area; on the basis of these data sets, the K-means algorithm has been employed to classify three kinds of surfaces within the study area: the dryland, the forest or natural areas, and the actually irrigated areas. The resulting maps have been validated by exploiting maps of crops in Catalonia as ground truth data set. The percentage of irrigated areas well classified by the proposed method reaches the value of 78%; this result is obtained for the period May - September 2017. In addition, the method performs well in distinguishing the irrigated areas from rainfed agricultural areas, which are dry during summer, thus representing a useful tool to obtain explicit spatial information about where irrigation practices actually occur over agricultural areas equipped for this purpose.</p>


2021 ◽  
pp. 126129
Author(s):  
Jacopo Dari ◽  
Pere Quintana-Seguí ◽  
María José Escorihuela ◽  
Vivien Stefan ◽  
Luca Brocca ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 705-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Efthymios Serpetzoglou ◽  
Emmanouil N. Anagnostou ◽  
Anastasios Papadopoulos ◽  
Efthymios I. Nikolopoulos ◽  
Viviana Maggioni

Abstract The study presents an in-depth investigation of the properties of remotely sensed rainfall error propagation in the prediction of near-surface soil moisture from a land surface model (LSM). Specifically, two error sources are compared: rainfall forcing due to estimation error by remote sensing techniques and the representation of land–atmospheric processes due to LSM uncertainty [the Community Land Model, version 3.5 (CLM3.5), was used in this particular study]. CLM3.5 is forced by three remotely sensed precipitation products, namely, two satellite-based estimates—NASA’s Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) multisatellite precipitation analysis and NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center morphing technique (CMORPH)—and a rain gauge-adjusted radar–rainfall product from the Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) network. The error analysis is performed for the warm seasons of 2004 and 2006 and is facilitated through the use of in situ measurements of soil moisture, rainfall, and other meteorological variables from a network of stations capturing the state of Oklahoma (Oklahoma Mesonet). The study also presents a rigorous benchmarking of the Mesonet network as to its accuracy in deriving area rainfall estimates at the resolution of satellite products (0.25° and 3 h) through comparisons against the most definitive measurements of a smaller-yet-denser network of rain gauges in southwestern Oklahoma (Micronet). The study compares error statistics between modeling and precipitation error sources and between the various remote sensing techniques. Results are contrasted between the relatively moist summer period of 2004 to the drier summer period of 2006, indicating model and error propagation dependencies. An intercomparison between rainfall and modeling error shows that the two error sources are of similar magnitudes in the case of high modeling accuracy (i.e., 2004), whereas the contribution of rainfall forcing error to the uncertainty of soil moisture prediction can be lower when the model’s efficiency skill is relatively low (i.e., 2006).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document