Accounting Rules? Stock Buybacks and Stock Options: Additional Evidence

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Griffin ◽  
Ning Zhu



2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan R. Dalton ◽  
Catherine M. Daily

Abstract:While many aspects of stock and option based compensation for corporate officers remain controversial, we suggest that the growing trend for similar practices in favor of boards of directors will prove to be even more contentious. High-ranking corporate managers do not set their own salaries nor authorize their own stock options. By contrast, boards of directors do, in fact, set their own compensation packages. Other potential conflicts of interest include setting option performance targets, stock buybacks, stock option resets and reloads, consolidations (mergers and acquisitions), and service on multiple boards. As trust is the most valuable commodity in a capitalist society, we suggest that these potential conflicts of interest and related outcomes may ultimately serve to erode any anticipated benefits of director stock compensation.



2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
David N. Hurtt ◽  
Jerry G. Kreuze ◽  
Sheldon A. Langsam


1993 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 31-36
Author(s):  
Barbara Whitaker Shimko ◽  
James J. Tucker


2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (01) ◽  
pp. 35-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry T. Yang

The main purpose of this paper is to examine two commonly used alternatives to traditional repricing (TR) of executive stock options (ESOs) in a dynamic agency model. TR practices have become obsolete since new accounting rules took effect in July 2000. To avoid associated variable accounting charges that cause uncertainty in future reported earnings, companies have tried several TR alternatives as solutions to rescuing underwater options. We justify the occurrence of TR alternatives and quantify the impact of the marking-to-market feature imbedded in the new accounting rules. We also propose an incentive measure which is comparable to the subjective value of ESOs claimed by Ingersoll, J (2006) to rank TR alternatives in terms of agent's incentive.





2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 193 ◽  
Author(s):  
RamMohan R. Yallapragada

A recent news flash announced that Warren Buffets Berkshire Hathaway would buy back $1.2 billion worth of its own Class A stock. In recent times, such stock buybacks are happening in rapid succession among companies all over the world. There are many advantages to investors of a company when the company buys back its own stock, generally known as treasury stock. Stock buybacks result in higher earnings per share (EPS), theoretically resulting in higher stock prices. Companies also resort to stock buybacks when they happen to have excessive cash balance. Cash rich companies are generally considered attractive targets for takeover possibilities. During times such as the present ones when returns on cash money market accounts do not yield attractive returns, companies usually implement stock buyback policies, thus earning better returns on excess cash while at the same time avoiding takeover possibilities. There are also some hidden advantages to senior management resulting from stock buybacks because of higher prices for their substantial stock options. There are also some disadvantages to investors resulting from stock buybacks. This paper presents some of the main reasons for stock buybacks, and the consequential advantages and disadvantages to investors and other stakeholders.



Controlling ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 707-714
Author(s):  
Christian Krensel ◽  
Andreas Siemes ◽  
Sina Afra
Keyword(s):  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document