Farm Data, Agency Problems, and Free Cash Flow Theory

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oghenovo A. Obrimah
2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 284-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Drummond Smith ◽  
Anita K. Pennathur

We examine earnings manipulation via discretionary accruals and real earnings management prior to the release of cash reserves back to shareholders. Previous research indicates that firms manage earnings upward when they increase dividends, creating a coordinated signal to the market. We study earnings management surrounding dividend initiation to determine whether management is manipulating earnings downward to avoid the discipline imposed by dividends in the years ahead or whether they are signaling to the market. We suggest that the aim of earnings management is not to reduce earnings but that earnings are more likely managed to preserve financial flexibility, create earnings reserves, and postpone shareholders’ expectations for initiating recurring dividends. Rather than signaling with upward earnings management, we find that dividend initiating firms manage earnings downward, consistent with the free cash flow theory. Our results explain findings in prior literature for the surprisingly stable earnings performance and accrual quality in the period just after dividend initiation. Furthermore, the market day stock price reaction is inversely related to earnings management, contradicting the purpose of signaling. We provide evidence that the managerial inertia for initiating dividends represents unique agency concerns compared with an increase in existing dividend payout and to the extent that downward real earnings management does not reverse, we identify a cost to shareholders for the quasi contract of recurring dividend payout.


2001 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 489-512
Author(s):  
P. HARBULA

The supposed preference of firms for internal financial sources to fund their investments can be explained by either the free cash-flow or the financial constraints theories, both relying on asymmetric information. Neither theory was found fully valid by recent research. Using a French data panel, conclusive evidence will be made in favour of the free cash-flow theory in special cases. The validity of the free cash-flow theory in special cases will bring new issues to light with the introduction of a new definition: soft budgeting problem of capital. Through this analysis, the possible interaction between capital market imperfections and general equilibrium will also gain new dimension.


2010 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin C. W. Chen ◽  
Zhihong Chen ◽  
K. C. John Wei

AbstractIn this paper, we examine the effect of shareholder rights on reducing the cost of equity and the impact of agency problems from free cash flow (FCF) on this effect. We find that firms with strong shareholder rights have a significantly lower implied cost of equity after controlling for risk factors, price momentum, analysts’ forecast biases, and industry and year effects than do firms with weak shareholder rights. Further analysis shows that the effect of shareholder rights on reducing the cost of equity is significantly stronger for firms with more severe agency problems from FCFs.


2009 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 321-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Griffin ◽  
David H. Lont ◽  
Yuan Sun

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (4, Special Issue) ◽  
pp. 391-398
Author(s):  
Meriem Jouirou ◽  
Faten Lakhal

This research investigates the governance role of voluntary disclosures especially in reducing agency problems measured by the level of free cash flow (FCF). In addition, it also shows the moderating effect of family ownership and governance mechanisms on this relation. Our research was conducted on a sample of 138 listed French firms between 2009 and 2013. To avoid the endogeneity problem caused by the voluntary disclosure variable we used the 2SLS regression method. The results show, on the one hand, that transparency provided by voluntary disclosures reduces the level of FCF and by the way agency problems. But family owners tend to accumulate FCF. On the other hand, the governance role of voluntary disclosure turns to be ineffective in family firms. This suggests a high risk of expropriation of minority shareholders by family ones. In addition, we demonstrate that governance mechanisms, especially board independence, gender diversity and audit committee independence, contribute to the strengthening of the governance role of voluntary disclosure.


2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 210-217
Author(s):  
Winston Pontoh

The random reaction in capital market by different perceptions and other factors makes it difficult for investors to get their optimum return. The objective of this study is to provide an empirical evidence about how the market will react by fundamental signal from the perspective of life cycle theory, free cash flow theory, and bird in the hand theory. The study presents the analysis of covariate for hypotheses testing with 241 firms as the sample which are listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange for period 2010–2015. This study finds that the life cycle theory and free cash flow theory are not absolute theories to explain the market reaction for any firms, because each firm has its own characteristics. The findings show that share prices shall react differently depending on each characteristics of the firm. The bird in the hand theory seems applicable in any case of firms, since the informational contents by dividend can deliver good signal to investors in capital market. Excluding the smaller and younger firms, this study proves that dividend is still a better way in determining the reaction of share prices, since each type of firms has its own types of dividend payers with different share prices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document