scholarly journals Market Definition and Market Power in Data: The Case of Online Platforms

Author(s):  
Inge Graef
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-48
Author(s):  
Richard Whish ◽  
David Bailey

This chapter provides an overview of competition law and its economic context. Section 2 describes the practices that competition laws attempt to control in order to protect the competition process. Section 3 examines the theory of competition and gives an introductory account of why the effective enforcement of competition law is thought to be beneficial. Section 4 considers the goals of competition law. Section 5 introduces two key economic concepts, market definition and market power, that are important to a better understanding of competition policy. The chapter concludes with a table of market share figures that are significant in the application of EU and UK competition law, while reminding the reader that market shares are only ever a proxy for market power and can never be determinative of market power in themselves.


Author(s):  
Miriam Caroline Buiten

Abstract Online platforms increasingly offer consumers services ‘for free’, in exchange for collecting consumers’ personal data. This business model is highly successful, leading some online platforms to gain substantial market power. This market power can cause consumer harm—not through higher prices, but in the form of privacy harm. This article considers what role competition law and data protection law can play in mitigating this harm to privacy. The article considers how we can conceptualize exploitative abuse of dominance cases in zero-price markets. The article calls into question if data protection laws should play a role in antitrust abuse assessments, against the background of the Bundeskartellamt antitrust investigation into Facebook’s data collection practices. The article argues that, even in digital markets that unequivocally link market power with data privacy concerns, competition law and data protection law have complementary but distinct roles to play.


2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence J. White

Antitrust and regulatory concerns swirl around the payment cards industry, for understandable reasons: It is not atomistic; it has network characteristics; it involves two-sided markets; and its two prominent members – Visa and MasterCard – are network joint ventures of the banks that issue cards to consumers and enroll and service the merchants who accept those cards. These characteristics raise the possibility that the industry may not be fully competitive and thus raise potential policy concerns. But these same characteristics also cloud the standard against which the performance of the industry should be judged and complicate the analysis necessary for forming judgments.


Pravovedenie ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 573-597
Author(s):  
Pierre Regibeau ◽  
◽  
Ioannis Lianos ◽  

The article reveals the main problems of antitrust law caused by the widespread use of digital technologies. The greatest challenge brought by the proliferation of digital technology and data is the emergence of new forms of pricing, which do not fit well with our traditional approach to the market definition or with our traditional assessment of the likely effect of mergers on prices. Digital sellers have the ability not only to recognize previous buyers more effectively but also to collect, store and exploit information about this buyer’s past behaviour in order to display products and prices aimed at maximising the seller’s profits given the available buyer profile. Individualised pricing enabled by digitalisation raises issues relative to market definition. In a world where digital sales enable customised pricing, the market is much more liable to segmentation. As a result, one must pay close attention to whether the merging parties are or not “especially close competitors” not only in terms of products but also in terms of consumer information. The authors conclude that AI-based algorithms could be used to facilitate tacit collusion between rivals. Coordination between independent parties is easier to achieve and maintain if the parties can agree on a common price, can detect any deviation from this agreement quickly and precisely and can react to such deviations quickly. Establishing this type of infringement would likely require expertise not currently available to most competition authorities. The article identifies several mechanisms through which the emergence of digital conglomerates, and hence the approval of digital conglomerate mergers, can affect competition adversely. The platform’s “market power” now depends on its ability to retain users within its own ecology and to use this to restrict the supply of advertising, leading to higher prices for both advertising and the corresponding products. This ability is increased by any acquisition which helps populate this ecology. Traditional measures of concentration can therefore easily understate, or even miss entirely, this type of merger-specific increase in market power.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document