Theft of Foreign-Owned Intellectual Property in Latin America: A New Strategy

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin J. Fandl
2004 ◽  
pp. 107-117
Author(s):  
Z. Romanova

The article is devoted to the analysis of economic and financial problems and contradictions accumulated in Latin America under conditions of globalization and market liberation. The originated unfavorable changes gave rise to the need of policy correction in big and small countries. The author analyses a new strategy of development adequate for Latin America with its specific geopolitical situation, demographic structure and history.


Author(s):  
Goretti Cabaleiro ◽  
Felipe Salce

This article reviews the primary implications of having strong intellectual property rights (IPRs) for innovation in the context of the situation in Latin America. Specifically, the article reviews the relationships, as found in the literature, between strong IPR protection and important economic and innovation-related variables both for developed and developing countries. Beyond its focus on Latin America, the paper also provides evidence and explains the situation of the different IPR regimes; describes the existing regional and global legislation and initiatives; and looks into the debate regarding the effect of IPRs in developing countries.


Author(s):  
A. Mauricio Oyarzo ◽  
Carmen Veloso Ramos ◽  
Dusan Paredes ◽  
Ariel Soto Caro ◽  
Rodrigo Fuentes Solís

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 535-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Ljung ◽  
Cecilia Pahlberg

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss how network relationships, with business as well as with non-business actors, affect each other and have an impact on strategy processes in subsidiaries in Latin America. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative approach is used in which a new strategy in a European multinational company (MNC) is studied at the subsidiary level in Brazil and Argentina. The authors discuss why the strategic processes are so different within the same MNC. During 2009-2011, 50 interviews were conducted with respondents in Latin America and at headquarters. Findings – The results point to the importance of including relationships with both business and non-business actors to understand the subsidiary strategy processes. The authors suggest that such processes can be explained by interdependent relationships in a wider network context characterised by commitment and trust, leading to increased legitimacy among the actors involved. Practical implications – Managers need to invest in relationships not only with business counterparts but also with non-business actors, as they are interdependent and vital for the strategy development. Originality/value – Relationships between firms and actors such as governments and civil society are still under-researched, although they are essential, especially in emerging economies. The paper puts focus on network relationships in strategy research and contributes to the development of business network theory by extending the network to also include relationships with such non-business actors and relate it to strategy processes. There is also a contribution to research on corporate social responsibility activities with a specific focus on Latin America.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document