Identification and Estimation of Endogenous Peer Effects in the Presence of Multiple Reference Groups

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadat Reza ◽  
Puneet Manchanda ◽  
Juin-Kuan Chong
2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Drago ◽  
Roberto Galbiati

We exploit the 2006 Italian prison pardon to evaluate peer effects in criminal behavior. The pardon randomly commutes actual sentences to expected sentences for 40 percent of the Italian prison population. Using prison and geographical origin to construct reference groups for former inmates, we find large indirect effects of this policy. In particular, we find that the reduction in the individuals' recidivism due to an increase in their peers' residual sentence is at least as large as their response to an increase in their own residual sentence. From this result we estimate a social multiplier in crime of two. (JEL D12, K42, Z13)


2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Götz ◽  
Grégoire Bollmann ◽  
Ernest H. O’Boyle

Within the constellation of employee misconduct, workplace deviance possesses the somewhat distinctive feature of violating organizational norms. Yet, the burgeoning research examining the social context surrounding workplace deviance typically fails to properly account for it. Interdisciplinary research has demonstrated that within organizations (a) multiple reference groups provide descriptive and injunctive norms about (in)appropriate behavior; (b) even when embedded within the organizational hierarchy, norms are not necessarily consistent across these groups; and (c) the immediate reference group often exerts a crucial influence. Against this background, we discuss prevalent conceptualizations of workplace deviance and systematically review the literature from 1995 to 2017. We present our findings according to external and organizational, leadership, and intraunit antecedents of workplace deviance by and within units, distinguishing, in particular, unit composition, processes and emergent states, climates, and norms. We conclude with a discussion of theoretical and methodological avenues for future research.


Author(s):  
Dana E. Hunt ◽  
Douglas S. Lipton ◽  
Douglas S. Goldsmith ◽  
David L. Strug

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Ordonez ◽  
Terry Connolly ◽  
Richard Coughlan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document