scholarly journals Effects of Three Methods of Breast Milk Expression on Breastfeeding Initiation, Breast Milk Extraction and Proportion of Exclusive Breastfeeding: An Open Label, Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Zhou ◽  
Jiaying Ni ◽  
Chenchen Zhou ◽  
Ying Chen ◽  
Julian Little ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Zhou ◽  
Jiaying Ni ◽  
Chenchen Zhou ◽  
Ying Chen ◽  
Julian Little ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Direct breastfeeding hasmultiple health benefits. Some mothers need to express their breasts when directly breast feeding is unavailable after delivery . However, there is insufficient evidence regarding an effective method of breast milk expression in the absence of an infant's suction. We aimed to investigate the effects of different methods of breast milk expression on breastfeeding initiation, efficacy of breast milk extraction, and on the rate of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months. Methods In this open-label, randomized controlled trial, the participants of mother-infant dyads separated immediately after birth for at least 6 hrs were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1:1) into three groups: (1) hand expression of breast milk; (2) sequential electrical breast pumping: and (3) simultaneous electrical breast pumping. The two primary outcome measures were the time required for initiation of breastfeeding and the milk volume expressed in a 10-minute session (direct breastfeeding in hand expression group) at 3 days and at 6 weeks; a secondary outcome was the proportion of exclusive breastfeeding at 4 and 6 months. Analysis was according to intention-to-treat. Results Between 2018 and 2019, we recruited 226 participants, of whom 154 were randomized. The time to breastfeeding initiation showed no difference between the three groups. At 3 days and at 6 weeks, the volume of breast milk produced by 10 minutes of sequential pumping or simultaneous pumping was less than that of hand pumping before direct breastfeeding, while the volume did not differ significantly between the two pumping groups. However, simultaneous breast pumping was more effective than sequential pumping both in volume and saving time in women who had established breastfeeding. The rate of exclusive breastfeeding at 4 months was 21.0%, and at 6 months 10.6%, and did not differ between the three methods of breast milk expression. Conclusions Hand expression, sequential breast pumping, or simultaneous breast pumping in absence of immediate infant suction after birth did not show differences on the time required to initiate breastfeeding, or on the rate of exclusive breastfeeding at 4 and 6 months. Trial registration This trial was registered with www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR1800018193) on 4 September 2018.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Zhou ◽  
Jiaying Ni ◽  
Chenchen Zhou ◽  
Ying Chen ◽  
Julian Little ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Direct breastfeeding has multiple health benefits. However, in certain circumstances direct breastfeeding is not possible immediately after delivery, yet provision of infants with their mother’s milk is important. There is insufficient evidence regarding an effective method of breast milk expression in the absence of an infant's suction. Therefore, we undertook a trial to investigate the effects of different methods of breast milk expression on breastfeeding initiation, efficacy of breast milk extraction, and on the rate of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months. Methods The participants of mother-infant dyads separated immediately after birth for at least 6 hrs were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1:1) into three groups: (1) hand expression of breast milk; (2) sequential and (3) simultaneous electrical breast pumping. The two primary outcome measures were the time required for initiation of breastfeeding and the milk volume expressed in a 10-minute session (direct breastfeeding in hand expression group) at 3 days and at 6 weeks; a secondary outcome was the proportion of exclusive breastfeeding at 4 and 6 months. The data were analysed according to intention-to-treat. Results Between 2018 and 2019, we recruited 226 participants, of whom 154 were randomized. The median time (in hours) of breastfeeding initiation of the sequential (46.5, 95% CI 36.1-50.5) and simultaneous (45.6, 95% CI 34.2-53.0) breast pumping groups did not differ from those of hand expression group (46.7, 95% CI 40.8-50.0) (p=1.000). At 3 days the breast milk volume (10 min per breast) through simultaneous pumping (13.1±10.9 ml), but not sequential pumping (16.7±11.6 ml) (p=0.560), was significantly less than hand expression (23.8±26.2 ml through direct sucking) (p=0.007). At 6 weeks the breast milk volume through sequential pumping (64.7±51.0 ml), but not simultaneous pumping (71.6±50.8 ml) (p=0.670), was significantly less than hand expression (89.8±67.3 ml through direct sucking) (p=0.035). The breast milk volume obtained through sequential breast pumping was 37.9 ml less than that obtained by those of simultaneous pumping (p<0.001). The rate of exclusive breastfeeding at 4 months was 21.0%, and at 6 months 10.6%, and did not differ between the three methods of breast milk expression. Conclusions Hand expression, sequential breast pumping, or simultaneous breast pumping in absence of immediate infant suction after birth did not show differences on the time required to initiate breastfeeding, or on the rate of exclusive breastfeeding at 4 and 6 months. Trial registration This trial was registered with www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR1800018193) on 4 September 2018.


2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982199474
Author(s):  
Maggie Xing ◽  
Dorina Kallogjeri ◽  
Jay F. Piccirillo

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive training in improving tinnitus bother and to identify predictors of patient response. Study Design Prospective open-label randomized controlled trial. Setting Online. Methods Participants were adults with subjective idiopathic nonpulsatile tinnitus causing significant tinnitus-related distress. The intervention group trained by using auditory-intensive exercises for 20 minutes per day, 5 days per week, for 8 weeks. The active control group trained on the same schedule with non–auditory intensive games. Surveys were completed at baseline, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks. Results A total of 64 participants completed the study. The median age was 63 years (range, 25-69) in the intervention group and 61 years (34-68) in the control group. Mixed model analysis revealed that within-subject change in Tinnitus Functional Index in the intervention group was not different than the control group, with marginal mean differences (95% CI): 0.24 (–11.20 to 10.7) and 2.17 (–8.50 to 12.83) at 8 weeks and 2.33 (–8.6 to 13.3) and 3.36 (–7.91 to 14.6) at 12 weeks, respectively. When the 2 study groups were compared, the control group had higher Tinnitus Functional Index scores than the intervention group by 10.5 points at baseline (95% CI, –0.92 to 29.89), 8.1 at 8 weeks (95% CI, –3.27 to 19.42), and 9.4 at 12 weeks (95% CI, –2.45 to 21.34). Conclusion Auditory-intensive cognitive training was not associated with changes in self-reported tinnitus bother. Given the potential for neuroplasticity to affect tinnitus, we believe that future studies on cognitive training for tinnitus remain relevant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document