Regulación del derecho de propiedad en un contexto de extrema desigualdad y Covid-19. Una mirada desde el derecho constitucional argentino e interamericano de derechos humanos (Regulation of Property Rights in a Context of Extreme Inequality and Covid-19. A look from the Argentine and Inter-American Constitutional and Human Rights Law)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Pablo Bohoslavsky ◽  
Laura Clerico
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Human Rights Law ◽  
Derechos Humanos

scholarly journals The impact of political globalization on human rights law

2017 ◽  
pp. 33-46
Author(s):  
Claudia Cinelli
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Human Rights Law ◽  
Derechos Humanos ◽  
El Sistema ◽  
Political Globalization ◽  
The Impact

En la era actual de globalización política, los Gobiernos mantienen su función tradicional de protagonistas en el sistema internacional (de derechos humanos). Al mismo tiempo, sin embargo, se espera que conciban instrumentos que potencien al máximo su capacidad para adaptarse a las necesidades de una protección efectiva de los derechos humanos debido a las «condiciones actuales». En verdad, si uno se para a reflexionar acerca de la cada vez mayor diversidad de actores internacionales y a considerar «la ley internacional en su variedad infinita», la cuestión es si el régimen internacional de derechos humanos de hoy en día es en realidad diferente hoy del de épocas anteriores. Al considerar la interacción entre la política (global) internacional y la ley internacional de derechos humanos, el artículo propone —en términos de desafíos— una reconsideración de las obligaciones (positivas) del Gobierno de conformidad con la naturaleza circular de la protección internacional de los derechos humanos.Publicación en línea: 11 diciembre 2017

Good Governance and Property Rights of the State: The Dubovets Case before the European Court of Human Rights and the Russian Constitutional Court

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-304
Author(s):  
Grigory Vaypan
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
International Human Rights Law ◽  
Human Rights Law ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
European Court ◽  
International Human ◽  
The Government

This contribution discusses the recent Dubovets case before both the European Court of Human Rights and the Russian Constitutional Court, and its implications for the changing design of Russian property law as increasingly shaped by international human rights law and good governance principles. Communicated in December 2016, the application in Dubovets v. Russia continues the line of the European Court’s cases against Russia on the protection of good faith private owners of real estate against property claims by the government. Prompted by this case law, the Russian Constitutional Court in its Judgment of 22 June 2017 No 16-P struck down Article 302 of the Russian Civil Code as unconstitutional insofar as it entitled the government to reclaim possession of state property that had been previously alienated due to the government’s own negligence. This judgment manifests the increasing interdependence between private and public law – of classical property law, on the one hand, and international human rights law and good governance principles, on the other hand. It also contributes to ongoing evolution in the understanding of the state’s property rights in Russia: from the superior status of public property in Soviet times – to formal equality between public and private property rights in the landmark legal instruments of the 1990s – and now to the growing need for special protection of individual property rights vis-à-vis the state, in light of the latter’s double role as both the largest owner and the (quite unrestrained) regulator.

scholarly journals Protección de las personas migrantes indocumentadas en España con arreglo al Derecho Internacional y Europeo de los derechos humanos = Protection of undocumented migrant persons in Spain under international and European human rights law

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 255
Author(s):  
Dorothy Estrada Tanck
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
International Human Rights Law ◽  
Undocumented Migrants ◽  
Human Rights Law ◽  
Undocumented Migrant ◽  
Legal Regime ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
Derechos Humanos ◽  
The Eu

Resumen: Este artículo trata sobre el régimen jurídico de protección de las personas migrantes indocumentadas en España, realizando una cartografía integral de los instrumentos internacionales y europeos de derechos humanos que les resultan aplicables y contrastando dicho marco jurídico con la normatividad y la práctica en el país. El trabajo identifica de modo temático y casuístico los riesgos y vulnerabilidades que enfrentan las personas migrantes en España y en la UE, y los examina de modo crítico y a la vez propositivo a la luz de los principios de igualdad y no-discriminación, la jurisprudencia de los órganos de NU y del TEDH, así como de las herramientas protectoras del propio orden jurídico español.Palabras clave: migrantes, derecho internacional de los derechos humanos, derecho europeo de los derechos humanos, migrantes en España, vulnerabilidad.Abstract: This article addresses the legal regime of the protection of undocumented migrants in Spain, integrally mapping the international and European human rights instruments that are applicable to them and contrasting such legal framework with the normativity and practice in the country. It identifies in a thematic and casuistic way, the risks and vulnerabilities confronted by undocumented migrants in Spain and the EU, and examines them critically and at the same time constructively under the light of the principles of equality and non-discrimination, the jurisprudence of UN bodies and the ECHR, as well as the protective tools provided by the Spanish legal system itself.Keywords: migrants, international human rights law, European human rights law, migrants in Spain, vulnerability.

scholarly journals Human rights and the impacts of climate change: Revisiting the assumptions

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annalisa Savaresi ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Paris Agreement ◽  
Human Rights Law ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
Derechos Humanos ◽  
High Commissioner ◽  
The World ◽  
Accountability Gap ◽  
Impacts Of Climate Change

The Paris Agreement acknowledges the need to tackle the permanent and irreversible impacts of climate change. It does not, however, provide means to hold state and non-state actors accountable for the harm to persons, property and the environment associated with climate change. In 2009 , the Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights (OHCHR) noted that qualifying the effects of climate change as human rights violations posed a series of technical obstacles. More than a decade later, applicants around the world increasingly rely on human rights law and institutions to complain about harms associated with the impacts of climate change. National, regional and international human rights bodies stand on the frontline to bridge the accountability gap left by the Paris Agreement. This article therefore revisits the OHCHR’s assumptions, suggesting that we use human rights as an interim “gap-filler”, while we seek better tools to tackle the impacts of climate change. El Acuerdo de París reconoce la necesidad de abordar los efectos permanentes e irreversibles del cambio climático. Sin embargo, no proporciona medios para hacer a los actores estatales y no estatales responsables del daño relacionado con el cambio climático infligido a personas, propiedades y al medio ambiente. En 2009, la Oficina del Alto Comisionado para los Derechos Humanos (ACNUDH) hizo notar que calificar los efectos del cambio climático como violaciones de derechos humanos presentaba algunos obstáculos técnicos. Más de una década después, solicitantes de todo el mundo se apoyan cada vez más en la jurisdicción sobre derechos humanos y sobre instituciones para protestar por los daños relacionados con el efecto del cambio climático. Entes nacionales, regionales e internacionales sobre derechos humanos están en la primera línea de lucha para cubrir el hueco sobre responsabilidad dejado por el Acuerdo de París. Este artículo revisita los supuestos aceptados por la ACNUDH, y propone que se utilicen los derechos humanos como un “parche” provisional mientras buscamos mejores instrumentos para abordar el efecto del cambio climático.

Injunctions

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaani Riordan
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Human Rights Law ◽  
European Union Law ◽  
Injunctive Relief ◽  
Safe Harbours

This chapter considers several limitations upon the availability, nature, and scope of injunctive remedies available against internet intermediaries. These limitations derive from four main sources: general principles of injunctive relief, European Union law, human rights law, and specific doctrinal rules. Some are of universal application; others apply in more limited fields, such as the grant of interim injunctions, the enforcement of intellectual property rights, or to particular classes of defendants. With some exceptions, they are not specific to the internet, or even to intermediaries, and so apply in other domains and to other parties as well. This chapter divides these rules into general limitations and those specific to intellectual property. Safe harbours are addressed separately in chapter 12.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document