Influence of Chemically Etched Roughness on Frictional Resistance of Micro-tubes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richie Garg ◽  
Amit Agrawal
Keyword(s):  
Frictional Resistance

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Frictional forces between different Archwire-bracket Combinations

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinit Singh ◽  
Swati Acharya ◽  
Satyabrata Patnaik ◽  
Smruti Bhusan Nanda
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Frictional Resistance ◽  
Nickel Titanium ◽  
Orthodontic Bracket ◽  
Fixed Appliance ◽  
Beta Titanium ◽  
Frictional Forces

Introduction: During sliding mechanics, frictional resistance is an important counterforce to orthodontic tooth movement; whichmust be controlled to allow application of light continuous forces.Objective: To investigate static and kinetic frictional resistance between three orthodontic brackets: ceramic, self-ligating, andstainless steel, and three 0.019×0.025” archwires: stainless steel, nickel-titanium, titanium-molybdenum.Materials & Method: The in vitro study compared the effects of stainless steel, nickel-titanium, and beta-titanium archwires onfrictional forces of three orthodontic bracket systems: ceramic, self-ligating, and stainless steel brackets. All brackets had 0.022”slots, and the wires were 0.019×0.025”. Friction was evaluated in a simulated half-arch fixed appliance on a testing machine. Thestatic and kinetic friction data were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Duncan multiple rangetest.Result: Self-ligating (Damon) brackets generated significantly lower static and kinetic frictional forces than stainless steel (Gemini)and ceramic brackets (Clarity). Among the archwire materials, Beta-titanium showed the maximum amount of frictional forceand stainless steel archwires had the lowest frictional force.Conclusion: The static and kinetic frictional force for stainless steel bracket was lowest in every combination of wire.

scholarly journals Resistance reduction on trimaran ship model by biopolymer of eel slime

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-102
Author(s):  
Y. Yanuar ◽  
G. Gunawan ◽  
M. A. Talahatu ◽  
R. T. Indrawati ◽  
A. Jamaluddin
Keyword(s):  
Drag Reduction ◽  
Frictional Resistance ◽  
Skin Surface ◽  
Fish Skin ◽  
Total Drag ◽  
Towing Tank ◽  
Ship Model ◽  
Resistance Reduction ◽  
Towing Tank Test ◽  
Tank Test

Resistance reduction in ship becomes an important issue to be investigated. Energy consumption and its efficiency are related toward drag reduction. Drag reduction in fluid flow can be obtained by providing polymer additives, coating, surfactants, fiber and special roughness on the surface hull. Fish skin surface coated with biopolymers viscous fluid (slime) is one method in frictional resistance reduction. The aim of this is to understanding the effect of drag reduction using eel slime biopolymer in unsymmetrical trimaran ship model. The Investigation was conducted using towing tank test with variation of velocity. The dimension of trimaran model are L = 2 m, B = 0.20 m and T = 0.065 m. The ship model resistance was precisely measured by a load cell transducer. The comparison of resistance on trimaran ship model coated and uncoated by eel slime are shown on the graph as a function of the total drag coefficient and Froude number. It is discovered the trimaran ship model by eel slime has higher drag reduction compared to trimaran with no eel slime at similar displacement. The result shows the drag reduction about 11 % at Fr 0.35.

Mechanism of Boundary Lubrication and the Edge Effect

1965 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 735-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Tamai ◽  
B. G. Rightmire
Keyword(s):  
Thin Film ◽  
Acid Solution ◽  
Palmitic Acid ◽  
Boundary Lubrication ◽  
Frictional Resistance ◽  
Copper Surface ◽  
Bulk Liquid ◽  
Attraction Force ◽  
Thin Film Lubrication ◽  
Film Lubrication

Experimental work was carried out on the boundary lubrication of a copper-copper couple with pure cetane, palmitic acid solution of cetane, and some other organic materials. The purpose was to get information about α and μlube, which appear in the friction equation: μ=αμsolid+(1−α)μlube, by using two different kinds of copper surface, a clean surface, and an oxidized surface. α was found to be small with palmitic acid solution, and the estimated shear strength of palmitic acid was high under the examined condition. α and μlube seemed to be properties which are independent of each other. α is closely related to the attraction force between the lubricant and the substrate, whereas μlube is related to the complexity of molecular structure of the lubricant. A comparison was made of bulk-liquid and thin-film lubrication. μlube was smaller in thin-film lubrication than it was in bulk-liquid lubrication. This suggests that the frictional resistance may be partly contributed by liquid in the edge space around the real contact.

The Influence of Bracket Material, Ligation Force and Wear on Frictional Resistance of Orthodontic Brackets

1993 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Keith ◽  
S. P. Jones ◽  
E. H. Davies
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Abrasive Wear ◽  
Single Crystal ◽  
Wear Debris ◽  
Aluminium Oxide ◽  
Frictional Resistance ◽  
Material Force ◽  
Orthodontic Bracket ◽  
Ceramic Brackets ◽  
Ceramic Bracket

Planar static frictional phenomena were investigated for two types of ceramic and one type of stainless steel orthodontic bracket against rectangular stainless steel archwire. The brackets studied were ‘Starfire’ (single crystal aluminium oxide), ‘Allure III’ (polycrystalline aluminium oxide), and ‘Dentaurum’ (stainless steel). The investigative parameters were: bracket material, force of ligation and whether the brackets were new or ‘worn’. Without exception, both types of ceramic bracket produced greater frictional resistance than the stainless steel brackets throughout testing. At a ligation force of 500 g, the Starfire bracket gave the greatest frictional resistance. At ligation forces of 200 and 50 g, the greatest frictional resistance was seen with Allure III. After a period of simulated wear, frictional resistance of Starfire tended to increase at the greatest ligation load while that of both ceramics decreased slightly at the two lower ligation loads. The ceramic brackets caused abrasive wear of the archwire surfaces and the consequent wear debris may have contributed to the changes in frictional resistance seen with Starfire and Allure III. Dentaurm brackets produced minimal frictional resistance in any test and negligible change with wear.

Reduced frictional resistance of polyurethane catheter by means of a surface coating procedure

1996 ◽  
Vol 61 (11) ◽  
pp. 1939-1948 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Nurdin ◽  
E. Weilandt ◽  
M. Textor ◽  
M. Taborelli ◽  
N. D. Spencer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Coating ◽  
Frictional Resistance ◽  
Polyurethane Catheter ◽  
Coating Procedure

On the Natural Lubrication of Synovial Joints: Normal and Degenerate

1977 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Mansour ◽  
Van C. Mow
Keyword(s):  
Articular Cartilage ◽  
Solid Phase ◽  
Articular Surface ◽  
Moving Load ◽  
Frictional Resistance ◽  
Elastic Solid ◽  
Surface Load ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Tissue Properties ◽  
Synovial Joints

Fluid flow and mass transport mechanisms associated with articular cartilage function are important biomechanical processes of normal and pathological synovial joints. A three-layer permeable, two-phase medium of an incompressible fluid and a linear elastic solid are used to model the flow and deformational behavior of articular cartilage. The frictional resistance of the relative motion of the fluid phase with respect to the solid phase is given by a linear diffusive dissipation term. The subchondral bony substrate is represented by an elastic solid. The three-layer model of articular cartilage is chosen because of the known histological, ultrastructural, and biomechanical variations of the tissue properties. The calculated flow field shows that for material properties of normal healthy articular cartilage the tissue creates a naturally lubricated surface. The movement of the interstitial fluid at the surface is circulatory in manner, being exuded in front and near the leading half of the moving surface load and imbibed behind and near the trailing half of the moving load. The flow fields of healthy tissues are capable of sustaining a film of fluid at the articular surface whereas pathological tissues cannot.

The Relationship Between Frictional Resistance and Roughness for Surfaces Smoothed by Sanding

2002 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 492-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Schultz
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Frictional Resistance ◽  
Resistance Coefficient ◽  
Polished Surface ◽  
Average Height ◽  
Freestream Velocity ◽  
Number Range ◽  
Test Fixture ◽  
Plate Length ◽  
The Relationship

An experimental investigation has been carried out to document and relate the frictional resistance and roughness texture of painted surfaces smoothed by sanding. Hydrodynamic tests were carried out in a towing tank using a flat plate test fixture towed at a Reynolds number ReL range of 2.8×106−5.5×106 based on the plate length and freestream velocity. Results indicate an increase in frictional resistance coefficient CF of up to 7.3% for an unsanded, as-sprayed paint surface compared to a sanded, polished surface. Significant increases in CF were also noted on surfaces sanded with sandpaper as fine as 600-grit as compared to the polished surface. The results show that, for the present surfaces, the centerline average height Ra is sufficient to explain a large majority of the variance in the roughness function ΔU+ in this Reynolds number range.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document