Observing Media Framing Effects through Online Social Media: A Case Study of the Debate on the Syrian Refugee Crisis Using Data from Facebook

Author(s):  
Juan Ortiz Freuler
2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 328-341
Author(s):  
Michael J. Frith ◽  
Miranda Simon ◽  
Toby Davies ◽  
Alex Braithwaite ◽  
Shane D. Johnson

Disasters ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 509-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
María del Mar Gálvez‐Rodríguez ◽  
Arturo Haro‐de‐Rosario ◽  
María del Carmen Caba‐Pérez

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 532-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela V. Dimitrova ◽  
Emel Ozdora-Aksak ◽  
Colleen Connolly-Ahern

Since the Syrian refugee crisis represents the worst humanitarian crisis in modern history, it is critical to examine how global media covered this issue. Focusing on two nations significantly affected by the refugee crisis—Bulgaria and Turkey, this study employs a content analysis to examine differences in refugee portrayals in national media. The results show that Turkish media coverage was more personalized and more likely to emphasize the victim frame. In contrast, Bulgarian coverage was less personalized and more likely to emphasize the administrative frame. The findings are placed within national context and their implications for media framing of refugees are discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 205630512110249
Author(s):  
Peer Smets ◽  
Younes Younes ◽  
Marinka Dohmen ◽  
Kees Boersma ◽  
Lenie Brouwer

During the 2015 refugee crisis in Europe, temporary refugee shelters arose in the Netherlands to shelter the large influx of asylum seekers. The largest shelter was located in the eastern part of the country. This shelter, where tents housed nearly 3,000 asylum seekers, was managed with a firm top-down approach. However, many residents of the shelter—mainly Syrians and Eritreans—developed horizontal relations with the local receiving society, using social media to establish contact and exchange services and goods. This case study shows how various types of crisis communication played a role and how the different worlds came together. Connectivity is discussed in relation to inclusion, based on resilient (non-)humanitarian approaches that link society with social media. Moreover, we argue that the refugee crisis can be better understood by looking through the lens of connectivity, practices, and migration infrastructure instead of focusing only on state policies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 101037 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Pollock ◽  
Joseph Wartman ◽  
Grace Abou-Jaoude ◽  
Alex Grant

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document