Job Creation and Destruction in Hungary

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabor Korosi
2008 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. 1943-1977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo J Caballero ◽  
Takeo Hoshi ◽  
Anil K Kashyap

Large Japanese banks often engaged in sham loan restructurings that kept credit flowing to otherwise insolvent borrowers (which we call zombies). We examine the implications of suppressing the normal competitive process whereby the zombies would shed workers and lose market share. The congestion created by the zombies reduces the profits for healthy firms, which discourages their entry and investment. We confirm that zombie-dominated industries exhibit more depressed job creation and destruction, and lower productivity. We present firm-level regressions showing that the increase in zombies depressed the investment and employment growth of non-zombies and widened the productivity gap between zombies and non-zombies. (JEL G21, G32, L25)


1997 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 371
Author(s):  
Charles J. Whalen ◽  
Steven J. Davis ◽  
John C. Haltiwanger ◽  
Scott Schuh

Econometrica ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 1507-1541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Garcia-Macia ◽  
Chang-Tai Hsieh ◽  
Peter J. Klenow

Entrants and incumbents can create new products and displace the products of competitors. Incumbents can also improve their existing products. How much of aggregate productivity growth occurs through each of these channels? Using data from the U.S. Longitudinal Business Database on all nonfarm private businesses from 1983 to 2013, we arrive at three main conclusions: First, most growth appears to come from incumbents. We infer this from the modest employment share of entering firms (defined as those less than 5 years old). Second, most growth seems to occur through improvements of existing varieties rather than creation of brand new varieties. Third, own‐product improvements by incumbents appear to be more important than creative destruction. We infer this because the distribution of job creation and destruction has thinner tails than implied by a model with a dominant role for creative destruction.


2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-193
Author(s):  
김준영 ◽  
정상철 ◽  
권호영

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rikard H Eriksson ◽  
Emelie Hane-Weijman

Using Swedish longitudinal micro-data, the aim of this paper is to analyse how regional economies respond to crises. This is made possible by linking gross employment flows to the notion of regional resilience. Our findings indicate that despite a steady national employment growth, only the three metropolitan regions have fully recovered from the recession of 1990. Further, we show evidence of high levels of job creation and destruction in both declining and expanding regions and sectors, and that the creation of jobs is mainly attributable to employment growth in incumbent firms, while job destruction is primarily due to exits and micro-plants. Although the geography of resistance to crises and the ability of adaptability in the aftermath vary, our findings suggest that cohesive (i.e., with many skill-related industries) and diverse (i.e., with a high degree of unrelated variety) regions are more resilient over time. We also find that resistance to future shocks (e.g., the 2008 recession) is highly dependent on the resistance to previous crises. In all, this suggests that the long-term evolution of regional economies also influences their future resilience.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document