Applicability of International Law in Development of Sustainable Port Policy: An Analysis of Good Practices and Future Policy of Gwadar Port

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Jahanzeb Butt
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Good Practices ◽  
Port Policy ◽  
Future Policy

Fragmentation of International Law Revisited: Insights, Good Practices, and Lessons to be Learned from the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 863-885 ◽  
Author(s):  
ADAMANTIA RACHOVITSA
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
European Convention ◽  
Vienna Convention ◽  
International Courts ◽  
Good Practices ◽  
European Court ◽  
Interpretation Process ◽  
Fragmentation Of International Law

AbstractThis article discusses the contribution of the European Court of Human Rights to mitigating difficulties arising from the fragmentation of international law. It argues that the Court's case law provides insights and good practices to be followed. First, the article furnishes evidence that the Court has developed an autonomous and distinct interpretative principle to construe the European Convention on Human Rights by taking other norms of international law into account. Second, it offers a blueprint of the methodology that the Court employs when engaging with external norms in the interpretation process. It analyses the Court's approach to subtle contextual differences between similar or identical international norms and its position towards the requirements of Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT). It concludes that international courts are developing innovative interpretative practices, which may not be strictly based on the letter of the VCLT.

SOME COMMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS ON THE MONTREUX DOCUMENT

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 321-345
Author(s):  
Marie-Louise Tougas
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Armed Conflicts ◽  
Conflict Zones ◽  
Good Practices ◽  
Legal Obligations ◽  
International Obligations ◽  
Swiss Government

AbstractGrowing concerns that PMSCs were operating in a legal vacuum led to increasing calls for further clarification on the role of such entities in conflict zones and to mounting pressure to develop a regulative framework under international law. In September 2008, 17 States endorsed the Montreux Document, an initiative sponsored by the Swiss government and the ICRC. The Montreux Document is a non-binding document aimed at identifying and reasserting the most relevant international legal obligations that govern the conduct of PMSCs during armed conflicts. It also provides for a set of guidelines on ‘good practices’ for States in regard to the operation of PMSCs in armed conflicts. Although it does not create any legal obligations, and only recalls existing ones, it is the first intergovernmental document to address international obligations in respect to the activities of PMSCs. It can thus be seen as a first step toward the establishment of a better regulative framework of PMSCs' activities in conflict zones. This article provides an overview of the process that led to the endorsement of this document and an analysis of its content. It also addresses some of the questions left unanswered by the Montreux Document.

The International Legal Effects of Unilateral Declarations

1977 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfred P. Rubin
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
International Court Of Justice ◽  
Binding Force ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
International Court ◽  
Unilateral Declaration ◽  
International Legal Order ◽  
The Icj ◽  
Nuclear Tests ◽  
Future Policy

The International Court of Justice is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations and its judgments are usually considered highly persuasive as to propositions of international law. Thus, when the ICJ formulates a rule of international law giving binding force to a unilateral declaration of a state’s future intentions, statesmen may be expected to refer to that formulation for guidance whenever they consider the possibility of issuing a declaration of future policy. Moreover, the ability of the ICJ to support its formulation of a rule of international law in terms of the international legal order and legal logic affects the perceptions of statesmen as to the probity of the Court, as well as the willingness of states to refer real cases to it. The Judgment of the ICJ in the Nuclear Tests cases raised both these issues in a particularly pointed way.

A New Status Quo? The Psychological Impact of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arden Rowell ◽  
Josephine van Zeben
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Loss Aversion ◽  
Psychological Impact ◽  
Status Quo ◽  
Paris Agreement ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Unusual Structure ◽  
Global Temperature Change ◽  
Future Policy ◽  
Policy Failures

This brief opinion piece draws upon behavioural and cognitive research to argue that the Paris Agreement's goal of keeping global temperature change below 2 degrees Celsius sets a psychologically powerful baseline against which future policy failures can be measured. When international law successfully triggers perception of a baseline, it can lead decision makers to perceive deviations from that baseline as “losses.” This implicates loss aversion, which provides an additional motivation to achieve international norms. The psychological impacts of this new status quo may end up being more powerful and more durable than either the unusual structure of the document or the domestic implementation questions that have already attracted so much scholarly debate.

Commentary on Part I of the Montreux Document on Pertinent International Legal Obligations and Good Practices for States Related to Operations of Private Military and Security Companies During Armed Conflict

2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (893) ◽  
pp. 305-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Louise Tougas
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
General Rule ◽  
Armed Conflicts ◽  
International Humanitarian Law ◽  
International Human Rights Law ◽  
Humanitarian Law ◽  
Human Rights Law ◽  
Good Practices ◽  
Legal Obligations ◽  
Security Companies

AbstractThe Montreux Document on Private Military and Security Companies (Montreux Document) was adopted in 2008 by seventeen States to reaffirm and, as far as was necessary, clarify the existing obligations of States and other actors under international law, in particular under international humanitarian law (IHL) and international human rights law (IHRL). It also aimed at identifying good practices and regulatory options to assist States in promoting respect for IHL and IHRL by private military and security companies (PMSCs). Today, fifty-one States and three international organizations have endorsed the Montreux Document. It contains twenty-seven “Statements” – sections recalling the main international legal obligations of States in regard to the operations of PMSCs during armed conflicts. Each statement is the reaffirmation of a general rule of IHL, IHRL or State responsibility formulated in a way that clarifies its applicability to PMSC operations. This article aims to detail the basis of each legal obligation mentioned in the first part of the Montreux Document (Part I). The article follows the structure of Part I, in order to better facilitate its comprehension. The second part of the Montreux Document, relating to good practices, is not covered in this article.

scholarly journals TEN GOOD PRACTICES IN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTITUTIONALISM: STRUCTURE, TEXT AND JUSTICIABILITY

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 964
Author(s):  
James R. May ◽  
Erin Daly
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
Constitutional Courts ◽  
Good Practices ◽  
Structure Text ◽  
Proper Subject ◽  
The Relationship

Environmental constitutionalism is a relatively recent phenomenon at the confluence of constitutional law, international law, human rights, and environmental law. It embodies the recognition that the environment is a proper subject for protection in constitutional texts and for vindication by constitutional courts worldwide. This chapter posits ten “good practices” – those attributes that make effective outcomes more likely, but not assured – in environmental constitutionalism for advancing positive environmental outcomes considering energy, and governance and sustainability. Good practices in environmental constitutionalism can serve as a useful construct for considering the relationship between sustainability, energy and governance. Accordingly, Section A examines the ten practices that are consequential for effectuating environmental constitutionalism and positive environmental outcomes. Section B then explains how the Robinson Township decision out of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in the United States provides a recent example just how good practices can have a positive impact on environmental outcomes in practice.

Police Use of Force under International Law

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Casey-Maslen ◽  
Sean Connolly
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Use Of Force ◽  
Police Use Of Force

International Law Reports

2017 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Law Reports

International Law Reports

2018 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Law Reports
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document