scholarly journals 2D force constraints in the method of regularized Stokeslets

Author(s):  
Ondrej Maxian ◽  
Wanda Strychalski
2011 ◽  
Vol 230 (10) ◽  
pp. 3929-3947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth L. Bouzarth ◽  
Michael L. Minion

2010 ◽  
Vol 229 (11) ◽  
pp. 4208-4224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth L. Bouzarth ◽  
Michael L. Minion

2008 ◽  
Vol 227 (9) ◽  
pp. 4600-4616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josephine Ainley ◽  
Sandra Durkin ◽  
Rafael Embid ◽  
Priya Boindala ◽  
Ricardo Cortez

Fluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. 283
Author(s):  
Laurel Ohm

We remark on the use of regularized Stokeslets in the slender body theory (SBT) approximation of Stokes flow about a thin fiber of radius ϵ>0. Denoting the regularization parameter by δ, we consider regularized SBT based on the most common regularized Stokeslet plus a regularized doublet correction. Given sufficiently smooth force data along the filament, we derive L∞ bounds for the difference between regularized SBT and its classical counterpart in terms of δ, ϵ, and the force data. We show that the regularized and classical expressions for the velocity of the filament itself differ by a term proportional to log(δ/ϵ); in particular, δ=ϵ is necessary to avoid an O(1) discrepancy between the theories. However, the flow at the surface of the fiber differs by an expression proportional to log(1+δ2/ϵ2), and any choice of δ∝ϵ will result in an O(1) discrepancy as ϵ→0. Consequently, the flow around a slender fiber due to regularized SBT does not converge to the solution of the well-posed slender body PDE which classical SBT is known to approximate. Numerics verify this O(1) discrepancy but also indicate that the difference may have little impact in practice.


2001 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 1204-1225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Cortez

Fluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 387
Author(s):  
Orrin Shindell ◽  
Hoa Nguyen ◽  
Nicholas Coltharp ◽  
Frank Healy ◽  
Bruce Rodenborn

The presence of a nearby boundary is likely to be important in the life cycle and evolution of motile flagellate bacteria. This has led many authors to employ numerical simulations to model near-surface bacterial motion and compute hydrodynamic boundary effects. A common choice has been the method of images for regularized Stokeslets (MIRS); however, the method requires discretization sizes and regularization parameters that are not specified by any theory. To determine appropriate regularization parameters for given discretization choices in MIRS, we conducted dynamically similar macroscopic experiments and fit the simulations to the data. In the experiments, we measured the torque on cylinders and helices of different wavelengths as they rotated in a viscous fluid at various distances to a boundary. We found that differences between experiments and optimized simulations were less than 5% when using surface discretizations for cylinders and centerline discretizations for helices. Having determined optimal regularization parameters, we used MIRS to simulate an idealized free-swimming bacterium constructed of a cylindrical cell body and a helical flagellum moving near a boundary. We assessed the swimming performance of many bacterial morphologies by computing swimming speed, motor rotation rate, Purcell’s propulsive efficiency, energy cost per swimming distance, and a new metabolic energy cost defined to be the energy cost per body mass per swimming distance. All five measures predicted that the optimal flagellar wavelength is eight times the helical radius independently of body size and surface proximity. Although the measures disagreed on the optimal body size, they all predicted that body size is an important factor in the energy cost of bacterial motility near and far from a surface.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document