scholarly journals Examination of Common Exams Held by Measurement and Assessment Centers: Many Facet Rasch Analysis

Author(s):  
Gülden KAYA UYANIK ◽  
Tuğba DEMİRTAŞ TOLAMAN ◽  
Duygu GÜR ERDOĞAN
2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 181-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonia Püschel
Keyword(s):  

Zusammenfassung. Die mit Urteils- und Entscheidungsprozessen verbundene Unsicherheit bildet ein ernstes Problem hinsichtlich der Qualität der Beurteilung oder des Risikos einer Fehlentscheidung. Zur Quantifizierung der Unsicherheit wird der in der physikalischen Metrologie gebräuchliche, international genormte Begriff der Messunsicherheit interdisziplinär auf die psychologische Praxis am Beispiel des Assessment Centers (AC) übertragen. Dabei werden zu bewertende Merkmale von Personen oder Alternativen in Analogie zu physikalischen Messgrößen betrachtet. Daraus folgt ein Auswerteverfahren, das zu den Ergebnissen der Merkmalsbewertungen jeweils auch quantitativ die Messunsicherheiten liefert. Außerdem lassen sich bei umfangreichem Datenmaterial Unsicherheitskennwerte berechnen, die konventionell ermittelte Korrelationskoeffizienten zur Beurteilung der Konstruktvalidität eines ACs ergänzen.


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 352-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Bonino ◽  
Federica Graziano ◽  
Martina Borghi ◽  
Davide Marengo ◽  
Giorgia Molinengo ◽  
...  

Abstract. This research developed a new scale to evaluate Self-Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis (SEMS). The aim of this study was to investigate dimensionality, item functioning, measurement invariance, and concurrent validity of the SEMS scale. Data were collected from 203 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients (mean age, 39.5 years; 66% women; 95% having a relapsing remitting form of MS). Fifteen items of the SEMS scale were submitted to patients along with measures of psychological well-being, sense of coherence, depression, and coping strategies. Data underwent Rasch analysis and correlation analysis. Rasch analysis indicates the SEMS as a multidimensional construct characterized by two correlated dimensions: goal setting and symptom management, with satisfactory reliability coefficients. Overall, the 15 items reported acceptable fit statistics; the scale demonstrated measurement invariance (with respect to gender and disease duration) and good concurrent validity (positive correlations with psychological well-being, sense of coherence, and coping strategies and negative correlations with depression). Preliminary evidence suggests that SEMS is a psychometrically sound measure to evaluate perceived self-efficacy of MS patients with moderate disability, and it would be a valuable instrument for both research and clinical applications.


2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Becker ◽  
Stefan Höft ◽  
Marcus Holzenkamp ◽  
Frank M. Spinath

As previous meta-analyses have focused almost solely on English-speaking regions, this study presents the first systematic meta-analytical examination of the predictive validity of assessment centers (ACs) conducted in German-speaking regions. It summarizes 24 validity coefficients taken from 19 studies (N = 3,556), yielding a mean corrected validity of ρ = .396 (80% credibility interval .235 ≤ ρ ≤ .558). ACs with different purposes and different kinds of criterion measures were analyzed separately. Furthermore, target group (internal vs. external candidates), average age of the assessees, inclusion of intelligence measures, number of instruments used, AC duration, as well as time elapsed between AC and criterion assessment were found to moderate the validity.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia G. Roch ◽  
Vipanchi Mishra ◽  
Eugene Trombini
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Kuncel ◽  
Paul Sackett ◽  
Matthew Borneman
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyssa Mitchell Gibbons ◽  
Deborah E. Rupp ◽  
Myungjoon Kim ◽  
Sang Eun Woo
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document