New options after first-line therapy for chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura

2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (2_Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S11-S21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julianna Burzynski
Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 4565-4565
Author(s):  
Joseph Mikhael ◽  
Alan Tinmouth ◽  
Tazmin Merali ◽  
Mo Amin ◽  
Wendy Lam

Abstract Background: In clinical practice there is little consensus on treating patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) beyond first line therapy with steroids. Objectives: Describe the demographic and disease characteristics of adult ITP patients who receive treatment; Obtain the treatment approach for patients with ITP beyond first line treatment with steroids, with an emphasis on splenectomy; and Evaluate adverse bleeding outcomes associated with ITP. Methods: A retrospective chart review of ITP patients after initial therapy with steroids was conducted. Ten physicians (oncologists and hematologists) were recruited from across Canada and each physician provided at least 5 ITP cases for review. A total of 51 cases were reviewed and patients (> 18 years old) were required to have had more than 1 course of steroids as treatment to be eligible. Results: The average age of patients at diagnosis was 42 (range 3 to 82 years); 37 (73%) of the patients were female, and 37 (73%) were Caucasian. The median platelet count upon presentation was 5×109/L. Median lines of therapy after initial therapy was 3 (range 0 to 6). Second line therapies varied, but most commonly patients underwent splenectomy (43%), followed by continued steroid treatment (16%), steroids plus IV Ig (16%), IV Ig alone (14%), immunosuppressant alone (2%), and anti-D plus steroids (2%). Of the patients reviewed, 40 (78%) eventually underwent splenectomy. Of the 40 splenectomized patients, 27 were splenectomized within the first year of diagnosis and 35 underwent splenectomy during the first 5 years. In addition, 62 of the splenectomies were laparoscopic, and the median hospital stay for all procedures was 5 days (range 1 to 60 days). Immediate failure of splenectomy occurred in 18% of patients, and the one- and five- year relapse/failure rates (defined as platelet count < 30×109/L) were 38% and 55%, respectively. Other therapies following splenectomy included IV Ig, azathioprine, cyclosporine, danazol, mycophenolate, rituximab, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and anti-D. Only 6% of IV Ig use was for chronic maintenance therapy and 74% of use was for urgent therapy. A total of 61 bleeding events occurred, of which 10 were major (upper GI, mouth, rectal, and nose). Major bleeding events required hospitalization of the patient with an average length of stay of 5 days (range 2 to 14 days). Conclusions: Notwithstanding several limitations, the retrospective chart review suggests that there is wide variation in long-term therapy for patients with chronic ITP in Canada. Splenectomy was the most widely used second line therapy, although 18% of the patients were non-responders and the five-year relapse/failure rate was 55%.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2059-2059
Author(s):  
Howard H.W. Chan ◽  
Nancy M. Heddle ◽  
John G. Kelton

Introduction: Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by destruction of opsonized platelets. The first-line therapy for adult patients with chronic ITP includes steroid, IVIG and anti-D. Splenectomy is reserved for patients not responding to the first-line therapy. However, approximately 20–30% of patients are resistant or relapsed after splenectomy. In this subgroup of patients, more aggressive immunosuppressive therapy is indicated. Methods: This is a case series of patients with chronic resistant ITP receiving multiple immunosuppressive treatments in a tertiary medical referral center. The diagnosis of ITP was established by excluding other thrombocytopenic diseases. Adult patients with chronic resistant ITP presenting with life threatening thrombocytopenia were selected for a therapeutic trial of immunosuppressive therapy. The therapy included azathioprine 100–200 mg daily; cyclosporine 100–200 mg daily; and mycophenolate 1–2 gm daily (triple immunosuppressive therapy). All of these patients failed 1st line therapy; splenectomy; and other immunosuppressive treatments. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension; impaired liver functions; impaired renal functions; and those who have not completed family were excluded from triple immunosuppressive therapy. A response to the therapy was defined as persistent platelet count above 30 without other concurrent treatments. When patients responded to the triple immunosuppressive therapy, the doses of the medications were gradually tapered to minimize the long-term side effects. Results: Since July of 2000, 11 patients with chronic resistant ITP have received triple immunosuppressive therapy for a variable duration (table 1). Five out of these 11 patients (45.5%) achieved a response within 4 to 6 weeks after the initiation of the treatments. One of the five patients eventually had a break-through during the tapering of triple immunosuppressive therapy. This patient was stabilized by further doses of IVIG and prednisone. The treatments were well tolerated. The most common side effects were mildly elevated blood pressure; and mildly impaired liver function tests. None of the patients suffered from serious side effects that resulted in termination of the treatments. Conclusion: Combining low-dose azathioprine, cyclosporin and mycophenolate can induce long-term remission in patients with chronic ITP resistant to steroid, IVIG, splenectomy and other immunosuppressive agents. This combination regimen is safe and well-tolerated. In adult patients with chronic resistant ITP, the immune dysfunction may need multiple immune blockades. Summary of Treatments ID Rx Prior to Triple Rx Concurrent Rx with Triple Rx Mean (mg OD) Mean (mg OD) Mean (gm OD) Response Duration of Triple Rx Triple Rx:Triple Immunosuppressive Therapy; PRD:Prednisone; DAN:Danazol; AnD:Anti-D; SPN:Splenectomy; VCR:Vincristine; CTX:Cyclophosphamide; LUF:Luflunomide 1 PRD, IVIG, DAN, SPN PRD, IVIG 66.7 63.8 1 No 77 2 PRD, IVIG, DAN, SPN, VCR 75 25 0.8 No 20 3 PRD, AnD, SPN, CTX PRD (taper) 75 50 0.9 Yes 91 4 PRD, SPN, DAN, CTX, LUF 100 100 2 No 106 5 PRD, IVIG, SPN, DAN PRD, IVIG 144.2 236.1 1.9 No 217 6 PRD, IVIG, SPN, DAN, VCR IVIG 91.7 120.5 1.4 No 406 7 PRD, IVIG, DAN, SPN, VCR PRD (taper) 140.9 156.6 1.6 Yes 296 8 PRD, IVIG, SPN, DAN, VCR DAN (taper) 150 100 2 Yes 1351 9 PRD, DAN, SPN, AnD, CTX IVIG 100 150 2 No 130 10 PRD, IVIG, SPN, VCR, CTX PRD (taper) 85.6 121.1 1.4 Yes 1456 11 PRD, DAN, IVIG, SPN, AnD IVIG, PRD (taper) 125.6 225 1.9 Yes 875


1998 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 1061-1063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Önder Alpdogan ◽  
Tülin Budak-Alpdogan ◽  
Siret Ratip ◽  
Tülin Firatli-Tuglular ◽  
Serpil Tanriverdi ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 503-503
Author(s):  
Richard Vanlangendock ◽  
Ramakrishna Venkatesh ◽  
Jamil Rehman ◽  
Chandra P. Sundaram ◽  
Jaime Landman

2008 ◽  
Vol 68 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
DJ Kersten ◽  
J McDougall ◽  
C Schuller ◽  
JP Pfammatter ◽  
L Raio ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document