Coping with death in the patient care setting

2015 ◽  
Vol 72 (11) ◽  
pp. 918-920
Author(s):  
Bryan M. Bishop ◽  
Lacey Shumate
2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen Connor ◽  
Patricia Reid Ponte ◽  
James Conway
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 1994-2001
Author(s):  
Margaret E. Smith ◽  
Aaron J. Bonham ◽  
Oliver A. Varban ◽  
Jonathan F. Finks ◽  
Arthur M. Carlin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca M. Crimmins ◽  
Lydia Elliott ◽  
Darren T. Absher

Context: Heart failure (HF) is a complex, life-limiting disease that is prevalent and burdensome. All major cardiology societies and international clinical practice guidelines recommend the integration of palliative care (PC) interventions alongside usual HF management. Objectives: The purpose of this review of the literature was to evaluate the various barriers to the early initiation of PC for HF patients in the primary care setting. Methods: An integrative literature review was conducted in order to assess and incorporate the diverse sources of literature available. An EBSCO search identified relevant articles in the following databases: Medline complete, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and SocINDEX. The search was limited to full text, peer reviewed, English only, and published between 2010 and 2019. Results: Barriers to the integration of PC for HF patients include poor communication between provider/patient and interdisciplinary providers, the misperception and miseducation of what PC is and how it can be incorporated into patient care, the unpredictable disease trajectory of HF, and the limited time allowed for patient care in the primary care setting. Conclusion: The results of this review highlight a lack of communication, time, and knowledge as barriers to delivering PC. Primary care providers caring for patients with HF need to establish an Annual Heart Failure Review to meticulously evaluate symptoms and allow the time for communication involving prognosis, utilize a PC referral screening tool such as the Needs Assessment Tool: Progressive Disease-Heart Failure, and thoroughly understand the benefits and appropriate integration of PC.


1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
ML Campbell ◽  
M Thill-Baharozian

BACKGROUND. The intensity and nature of a patient therapeutic plan should depend upon the specific therapeutic goals. When the therapeutic plan includes a do-not-resuscitate order, the intensity of the plan may be high or low. OBJECTIVE. To examine the differences in patient care requirements and hospital outcomes in patients with a do-not-resuscitate status to determine the most appropriate care setting, eg, intensive vs nonintensive care. METHOD. Data from a prospective sample of 100 patients were analyzed. Patients were grouped according to the intensity of the therapeutic plan: (1) all-but-CPR: all support except cardiopulmonary resuscitation, (2) conservative-care: medical management without the addition of life-sustaining measures, (3) comfort-only, and (4) withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. RESULTS. Patient mortality was high for all groups except the conservative-care group. Patient care requirements remained high in the all-but-CPR group, necessitating continued intensive care. Patient care requirements decreased significantly in the comfort-only and withdrawal groups, illustrating the ability to manage these patients in a nonintensive care setting.


2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 504-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Henrickson Parker ◽  
Jan B. Schmutz ◽  
Tanja Manser

A team’s ability to coordinate and adapt their performance to meet situational demands is critical to excellent patient care. The goal of this article is to identify common coordination characteristics that enable health care action teams to ensure effective patient care and to discuss specific examples of adaptive coordination within the health care setting. Task analyses were conducted to identify situational demands, in three different clinical settings: cardiac anesthesia, pediatric sepsis simulation, and trauma resuscitation. Each task analysis identified specific coordination requirements for pertinent tasks. The research team compared these task analyses, identified emerging themes, and agreed on core coordination characteristics common across all three environments by consensus through iterative abductive analysis. Findings across these diverse clinical settings showed that expert action teams (a) continually appraise their dynamic environment, (b) identify and define points of coordination, and (c) respond to the demands of nonroutine events by making coordination highly explicit. Specific examples of adaptive coordination within the health care setting are discussed, and implications for training are articulated. Findings are also pertinent outside of health care and may contribute to the understanding of coordination behaviors within action teams across multiple settings.


Critical Care ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 12 (Suppl 4) ◽  
pp. S2 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P Nicolau
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document