Learning of Psychomotor Skills: Laboratory Versus Patient Care Setting

1987 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-24
Author(s):  
Gerda E Gomez ◽  
Efrain A Gomez
2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen Connor ◽  
Patricia Reid Ponte ◽  
James Conway
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-183
Author(s):  
Bernard Grevemeyer ◽  
Andrew Knight

Dedicated clinical skills laboratories (CSLs) that make use of models, mannequins and simulators, are being increasingly established in medical and veterinary schools. These have been commonplace in medical schools for more than two decades, but their incorporation within the teaching of veterinary curricula has occurred much more recently. In 2007, a decision was taken to establish a CSL at Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine. We considered the range of skills that we wished to teach, the physical space and equipment needed, the storage and air conditioning requirements, the facilities needed to deliver PowerPoint lectures and case study presentations, and other essentials necessary to handle cadaver specimens. We converted an appropriate campus building to our needs, hired teaching staff, and started to source models and mannequins for the teaching of veterinary clinical skills. In 2010, 177 senior students completed a survey evaluating their experiences within our CSL. Student satisfaction was generally high, with 95% of respondents feeling that the CSL had improved their psychomotor skills. However, 15% of them felt that the models were insufficiently realistic. Our clinical skills programme has since developed considerably, and it currently offers instruction in a diverse array of surgical, medical and other clinical skills. We hope that this description of our experiences may assist others embarking on similar projects elsewhere.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 1994-2001
Author(s):  
Margaret E. Smith ◽  
Aaron J. Bonham ◽  
Oliver A. Varban ◽  
Jonathan F. Finks ◽  
Arthur M. Carlin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca M. Crimmins ◽  
Lydia Elliott ◽  
Darren T. Absher

Context: Heart failure (HF) is a complex, life-limiting disease that is prevalent and burdensome. All major cardiology societies and international clinical practice guidelines recommend the integration of palliative care (PC) interventions alongside usual HF management. Objectives: The purpose of this review of the literature was to evaluate the various barriers to the early initiation of PC for HF patients in the primary care setting. Methods: An integrative literature review was conducted in order to assess and incorporate the diverse sources of literature available. An EBSCO search identified relevant articles in the following databases: Medline complete, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and SocINDEX. The search was limited to full text, peer reviewed, English only, and published between 2010 and 2019. Results: Barriers to the integration of PC for HF patients include poor communication between provider/patient and interdisciplinary providers, the misperception and miseducation of what PC is and how it can be incorporated into patient care, the unpredictable disease trajectory of HF, and the limited time allowed for patient care in the primary care setting. Conclusion: The results of this review highlight a lack of communication, time, and knowledge as barriers to delivering PC. Primary care providers caring for patients with HF need to establish an Annual Heart Failure Review to meticulously evaluate symptoms and allow the time for communication involving prognosis, utilize a PC referral screening tool such as the Needs Assessment Tool: Progressive Disease-Heart Failure, and thoroughly understand the benefits and appropriate integration of PC.


2015 ◽  
Vol 72 (11) ◽  
pp. 918-920
Author(s):  
Bryan M. Bishop ◽  
Lacey Shumate

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
ML Campbell ◽  
M Thill-Baharozian

BACKGROUND. The intensity and nature of a patient therapeutic plan should depend upon the specific therapeutic goals. When the therapeutic plan includes a do-not-resuscitate order, the intensity of the plan may be high or low. OBJECTIVE. To examine the differences in patient care requirements and hospital outcomes in patients with a do-not-resuscitate status to determine the most appropriate care setting, eg, intensive vs nonintensive care. METHOD. Data from a prospective sample of 100 patients were analyzed. Patients were grouped according to the intensity of the therapeutic plan: (1) all-but-CPR: all support except cardiopulmonary resuscitation, (2) conservative-care: medical management without the addition of life-sustaining measures, (3) comfort-only, and (4) withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. RESULTS. Patient mortality was high for all groups except the conservative-care group. Patient care requirements remained high in the all-but-CPR group, necessitating continued intensive care. Patient care requirements decreased significantly in the comfort-only and withdrawal groups, illustrating the ability to manage these patients in a nonintensive care setting.


2000 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 229-230
Author(s):  
Marsha D Snyder ◽  
Bernardine M Fitzloff ◽  
Ruth Fiedler ◽  
Mary Rose Lambke

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document