Impact of the DNR therapeutic plan on patient care requirements

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
ML Campbell ◽  
M Thill-Baharozian
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Intensive Care Patient ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
Care Group ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Conservative Care ◽  
Therapeutic Goals ◽  
Appropriate Care ◽  
Care Requirements

BACKGROUND. The intensity and nature of a patient therapeutic plan should depend upon the specific therapeutic goals. When the therapeutic plan includes a do-not-resuscitate order, the intensity of the plan may be high or low. OBJECTIVE. To examine the differences in patient care requirements and hospital outcomes in patients with a do-not-resuscitate status to determine the most appropriate care setting, eg, intensive vs nonintensive care. METHOD. Data from a prospective sample of 100 patients were analyzed. Patients were grouped according to the intensity of the therapeutic plan: (1) all-but-CPR: all support except cardiopulmonary resuscitation, (2) conservative-care: medical management without the addition of life-sustaining measures, (3) comfort-only, and (4) withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. RESULTS. Patient mortality was high for all groups except the conservative-care group. Patient care requirements remained high in the all-but-CPR group, necessitating continued intensive care. Patient care requirements decreased significantly in the comfort-only and withdrawal groups, illustrating the ability to manage these patients in a nonintensive care setting.

Adaption and validation of the quality in Intensive Care Patient Care Scale (QICPaCS)

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debbie J. Carney ◽  
Leanne M. Aitken ◽  
Elizabeth Burmeister
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Intensive Care Patient ◽  
Care Patient

Impact of patient consciousness on the intensity of the do-not-resuscitate therapeutic plan

1996 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 339-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
ML Campbell ◽  
MC Thill
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Illness Severity ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Conservative Care ◽  
Scale Scores ◽  
Care Requirements ◽  
Record Review ◽  
The Impact

BACKGROUND: The nature and intensity of a do-not-resuscitate therapeutic plan varies by patient. Some do-not-resuscitate therapeutic plans may include interventions directed at the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of patient consciousness on the nature and intensity of the do-not-resuscitate plan, and on the decision to withdraw life-sustaining therapy. METHODS: This study represents a secondary analysis of data obtained in a previous study to evaluate patient care requirements under varying intensities of do-not-resuscitate plans. Data were collected retrospectively through record review. Patients were grouped as follows, according to the intensity of the do-not-resuscitate plan: (1) all but cardiopulmonary resuscitation, (2) conservative care without cardiopulmonary resuscitation, (3) comfort only, and (4) withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. In addition to demographic data, consciousness and illness severity were measured. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in consciousness from admission in all groups except conservative care. The withdrawal group had the lowest average Glasgow Coma Scale scores at the time of the do-not-resuscitate designation. Multiple regression analysis was used to demonstrate a significant impact of consciousness on type of do-not-resuscitate decision, but no significant impact from age or illness severity. CONCLUSIONS: These results support previous observations that decisions to withdraw life-sustaining therapy are prompted by diminished consciousness. These results may stimulate caregivers to offer withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy as an option in patients with severely decreased consciousness and a poor prognosis for functional recovery.

scholarly journals Contamination of Healthcare Worker Personal Protective Equipment with MRSA Outside the Intensive Care Unit Setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s27-s28
Author(s):  
Gita Nadimpalli ◽  
Lisa Pineles ◽  
Karly Lebherz ◽  
J. Kristie Johnson ◽  
David Calfee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Direct Patient Care ◽  
Care Group ◽  
Surveillance Culture ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Contact Precautions ◽  
Patient Interactions ◽  
The Right

Background: Estimates of contamination of healthcare personnel (HCP) gloves and gowns with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) following interactions with colonized or infected patients range from 17% to 20%. Most studies were conducted in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting where patients had a recent positive clinical culture. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of MRSA transmission to HCP gloves and gown in non-ICU acute-care hospital units and to identify associated risk factors. Methods: Patients on contact precautions with history of MRSA colonization or infection admitted to non-ICU settings were randomly selected from electronic health records. We observed patient care activities and cultured the gloves and gowns of 10 HCP interactions per patient prior to doffing. Cultures from patients’ anterior nares, chest, antecubital fossa and perianal area were collected to quantify bacterial bioburden. Bacterial counts were log transformed. Results: We observed 55 patients (Fig. 1), and 517 HCP–patient interactions. Of the HCP–patient interactions, 16 (3.1%) led to MRSA contamination of HCP gloves, 18 (3.5%) led to contamination of HCP gown, and 28 (5.4%) led to contamination of either gloves or gown. In addition, 5 (12.8%) patients had a positive clinical or surveillance culture for MRSA in the prior 7 days. Nurses, physicians and technicians were grouped in “direct patient care”, and rest of the HCPs were included in “no direct care group.” Of 404 interactions, 26 (6.4%) of providers in the “direct patient care” group showed transmission of MRSA to gloves or gown in comparison to 2 of 113 (1.8%) interactions involving providers in the “no direct patient care” group (P = .05) (Fig. 2). The median MRSA bioburden was 0 log 10CFU/mL in the nares (range, 0–3.6), perianal region (range, 0–3.5), the arm skin (range, 0-0.3), and the chest skin (range, 0–6.2). Detectable bioburden on patients was negatively correlated with the time since placed on contact precautions (rs= −0.06; P < .001). Of 97 observations with detectable bacterial bioburden at any site, 9 (9.3%) resulted in transmission of MRSA to HCP in comparison to 11 (3.6%) of 310 observations with no detectable bioburden at all sites (P = .03). Conclusions: Transmission of MRSA to gloves or gowns of HCP caring for patients on contact precautions for MRSA in non-ICU settings was lower than in the ICU setting. More evidence is needed to help guide the optimal use of contact precautions for the right patient, in the right setting, for the right type of encounter.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Occupational Exposures in the Homecare Environment: Piloting an Observation Tool

2021 ◽  
pp. 108482232098691
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Bien ◽  
Kermit Davis ◽  
Susan Reutman ◽  
Gordon Gillespie
Keyword(s):  
Home Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Occupational Safety ◽  
Occupational Exposures ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
Home Healthcare ◽  
Occupational Hazards ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Direct Observations ◽  
Occupational Setting

The population of home healthcare workers (HHCWs) is rapidly expanding. Worker tasks and the unique home care environments place the worker at increased risks of occupational exposures, injury, and illness. Previous studies focusing on occupational exposures of HHCWs are limited to self-reports and would benefit from direct observations. The purpose of this study is to describe the occupational hazards observed in the unique work environment of home healthcare. HHCWs and home care patient participants were recruited from one home care agency in the Midwest to be observed during a routine home visit. This cross-sectional study used a trained occupational health nurse for direct observation of the occupational setting. Standardized observations and data collection were completed using the Home Healthcare Worker Observation Tool. The observer followed a registered nurse and occupational therapist into 9 patient homes observing visits ranging from 22 to 58 minutes. Hazards observed outside of and within the home include uneven pavements (n = 6, 67%), stairs without railings (n = 2, 22%), throw rugs (n = 7, 78%), unrestrained animals (n = 2, 22%), dust (n = 5, 56%), and mold (n = 2, 22%). Hand hygiene was observed prior to patient care 2 times (22%) and after patient care during 5 visits (56%). Observations have identified hazards that have the potential to impact workers’ and patients’ health. The direct observations of HHCWs provided opportunities for occupational safety professionals to understand the occupational exposures and challenges HHCWs encounter in the home care environment and begin to identify ways to mitigate occupational hazards.

scholarly journals Miliaria crystallina in an intensive care patient

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meriem Rouai ◽  
Meryam Chaabani ◽  
Ayette Laabidi ◽  
Noureddine Litaiem ◽  
Lotfi Rebai
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Patient ◽  
Care Patient

FRI0512 INTEGRATED CARE NETWORK AS A BUILDING STONE FOR SUSTAINABLE AND COMPREHENSIVE CARE FOR PATIENTS WITH ARTHRALGIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 855.1-855
Author(s):  
E. Van Delft ◽  
K. H. Han ◽  
J. Hazes ◽  
D. Lopes Barreto ◽  
A. Weel
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Integrated Care ◽  
Usual Care Group ◽  
Inflammatory Arthritis ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Care Group ◽  
Care Network ◽  
The Right

Background:Western countries experience an increasing demand for care, particularly for inflammatory arthritis (IA), while the healthcare budget decreases1. The innovative value-based primary care strategy2includes integrated care networks, where primary and secondary care bundle their expertise to improve patient value by providing the right care at the right place.General practitioners (GPs) have difficulties recognising IA, leading up to only 20% IA diagnoses of all newly referred arthralgia patients. However, since IA needs to be treated as early as possible to overcome progression, it is worthwhile to analyse whether integrated care networks have an impact on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Triage by a rheumatologist in a primary care setting is one of the most promising integrated care networks for efficient referrals3.Objectives:To assess the effect of triage by a rheumatologist in a primary care setting in patients suspect for inflammatory arthritis.Methods:The present study follows a cluster randomized controlled trial design. The intervention, triage by a rheumatologist in a local primary care centre, will be compared to usual care. Usual care means that patients are referred to a rheumatology outpatient clinic based on the opinion of the general practitioner.The primary outcome is the frequency of IA diagnoses assessed by a rheumatologist. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs (EQ-5D)) and costs (work productivity (iPCQ) and healthcare utilization (iMCQ)) were determined at baseline, after three, six and twelve months. The target was to include 267 patients for each study group (power level 0.8). Since this study is still ongoing we can only show first results on the efficiency of referrals.Results:In the period between February 2017 and December 2019 a total of 543 participants were included; 275 in the usual care group and 268 in the triage group. Mean age (51.3 ± 14.6 years) and percentage of men (23.6%) were comparable between groups (page=0.139; psex=0.330).The preliminary data show that the number of referred patients in the triage group is n=28 (10.5%) (Fig. 1). 32 patients (11.9%) were not referred directly but advice was given for additional diagnostics. Since all patients in the usual care group were referred there is a decrease of at least 77.6% in referrals when rheumatologists are participating in the integrated practice units.Preliminary data on diagnosis are available for all referred patients in the triage group and for n=137 (49.8%) in the usual care group at this point. In the triage group n=18 (64.2%) of referred patients were diagnosed with IA (6.7% of the total study population). In the usual care group this was n=52 (38.0%) of the patients yet diagnosed.Conclusion:These preliminary results of an integrated care network are promising. Approximately three-quarters of all patients can be withheld from expensive outpatient care. PROMs data and cost-effectiveness analysis will give clear answers in order to provide evidence whether this integrated care network can be implemented as a standard of care.References:[1] Rijksoverheid. (2018). Bestuurlijk akkoord medisch-specialistische zorg 2019 t/m 2022.https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/.[2] Porter ME, Pabo EA, Lee TH. (2013). Redesigning Primary Care: a strategic vision to improve value by organizing around patients’ needs. Health affairs, 32(3);516-525[3] Akbari A, et al. (2008). Interventions to improve outpatient referrals from primary care to secondary care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4,CD005471.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Pediatric Endocrinology in the Time of COVID-19: Considerations for the Rapid Implementation of Telemedicine and Management of Pediatric Endocrine Conditions

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. 343-350
Author(s):  
Molly O. Regelmann ◽  
Rushika Conroy ◽  
Evgenia Gourgari ◽  
Anshu Gupta ◽  
Ines Guttmann-Bauman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Care Patient ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Patient Privacy ◽  
Pediatric Endocrinology ◽  
Quality Of Patient Care ◽  
Care Outcomes ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
The Impact

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Pediatric endocrine practices had to rapidly transition to telemedicine care at the onset of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. For many, it was an abrupt introduction to providing virtual healthcare, with concerns related to quality of patient care, patient privacy, productivity, and compensation, as workflows had to change. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> The review summarizes the common adaptations for telemedicine during the pandemic with respect to the practice of pediatric endocrinology and discusses the benefits and potential barriers to telemedicine. <b><i>Key Messages:</i></b> With adjustments to practice, telemedicine has allowed providers to deliver care to their patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The broader implementation of telemedicine in pediatric endocrinology practice has the potential for expanding patient access. Research assessing the impact of telemedicine on patient care outcomes in those with pediatric endocrinology conditions will be necessary to justify its continued use beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document