scholarly journals Decision-Making by Emergency Medicine Personnel in Prehospital Treatment of Patients Receiving Palliative Care: A Questionnaire, Comparative Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 1111-1118
Author(s):  
Thidathit Prachanukool ◽  
Chaiyaporn Yuksen ◽  
Sirada Jintanavasan ◽  
Chetsadakon Jenpanitpong ◽  
Sorawich Watcharakitpaisan ◽  
...  
Emotion ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 581-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca A. Ferrer ◽  
Lynne Padgett ◽  
Erin M. Ellis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoki Matsumaru ◽  
Hideshi Okada ◽  
Kodai Suzuki ◽  
Sho Nachi ◽  
Takahiro Yoshida ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1352-1355
Author(s):  
Marianna V. Mapes ◽  
Peter A. DePergola ◽  
William T. McGee

Decision-making for the hospitalized dying and critically ill is often characterized by an understanding of autonomy that leads to clinical care and outcomes that are antithetical to patients’ preferences around suffering and quality of life. A better understanding of autonomy will facilitate the ultimate goal of a patient-centered approach and ensure compassionate, high-quality care that respects our patients’ values. We reviewed the medical literature and our experiences through the ethics service, palliative care service, and critical care service of a large community teaching hospital. The cumulative experience of a senior intensivist was filtered through the lens of a medical ethicist and the palliative care team. The practical application of patient-centered care was discerned from these interactions. We determined that a clearer understanding of patient-centeredness would improve the experience and outcomes of care for our patients as well as our adherence to ethical practice. The practical applications of autonomy and patient-centered care were evaluated by the authors through clinical interactions on the wards to ascertain problems in understanding their meaning. Clarification of autonomy and patient-centeredness is provided using specific examples to enhance understanding and application of these principles in patient-centered care.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 2605-2613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidewine Daniels ◽  
Çağdaş Ünlü ◽  
Thomas R. de Wijkerslooth ◽  
Hein B. Stockmann ◽  
Ernst J. Kuipers ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Azadeh Assadi ◽  
Peter C. Laussen ◽  
Patricia Trbovich

Background and aims: Children with congenital heart disease (CHD) are at risk of deterioration in the face of common childhood illnesses, and their resuscitation and acute management is often best achieved with the guidance of CHD experts. Access to such expertise may be limited outside specialty heart centers and the fragility of these patients is cause for discomfort among many emergency medicine physicians. An understanding of the differences in macrocognition of these clinicians could shed light on some of the causes of discomfort and facilitate the development of a sociotechnological solution to this problem. Methods: Cardiac intensivists (CHD experts) and pediatric emergency medicine physicians (non-CHD experts) in a major academic cardiac center were interviewed using the critical decision method. Interview transcripts were coded deductively based on Klein’s macrocognitive framework and inductively to allow for new or modified characterization of dimensions. Results: While both CHD-experts and non-CHD experts relied on the macrocognitive functions of sensemaking, naturalistic decision making and detecting problems, the specific data and mental models used to understand the patients and course of therapy differed between CHD-experts and non-CHD experts. Conclusion: Characterization of differences between the macrocognitive processes of CHD experts and non-CHD experts can inform development of sociotechnological solutions to augment decision making pertaining to the acute management of pediatric CHD patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document