scholarly journals Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Predicts 3-Month Functional Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated with Intravenous Thrombolysis

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 16 ◽  
pp. 877-886
Author(s):  
Yiyun Weng ◽  
Tian Zeng ◽  
Honghao Huang ◽  
Junli Ren ◽  
Jianing Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Immune Inflammation

Meta-analysis of the Smoker’s Paradox in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Receiving Intravenous Thrombolysis or Endovascular Treatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1181-1188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Zhen-Ni Guo ◽  
Xin Sun ◽  
Yingkai Zhao ◽  
Yi Yang
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Good Functional Outcome

Abstract Introduction The existence of the smoker’s paradox is controversial and potential mechanisms have not been explained. We aimed to explore the association between cigarette smoking and functional outcome at 3 months in patients with acute ischemic stroke who were treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or endovascular treatment (EVT). Methods This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Studies exploring the association between smoking and good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2) following IVT or EVT were searched via the databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to August 8, 2018. Information on the characteristics of included studies was independently extracted by two investigators. Data were pooled using a random-effects or fixed-effects meta-analysis according to the heterogeneity of included studies. Results Among 20 identified studies, 15 reported functional outcomes following IVT, and five reported functional outcomes following EVT. Unadjusted analyses showed that smoking increased the odds of good functional outcomes with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.48 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36–1.60) after IVT and 2.10 (95% CI: 1.47–3.20) after EVT. Of IVT studies, only eight reported outcomes adjusted for covariates and none of the EVT studies reported adjusted outcomes. After adjustment, the relation between smoking and good functional outcome following IVT lost statistical significance (OR 1.14 [95% CI: 0.81–1.59]). Conclusion Our meta-analysis suggested that smoking was not associated with good functional outcome (mRS ≤ 2) at 3 months in patients with acute ischemic stroke who were treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Implications The existence of the smoker’s paradox is controversial. A previous letter by Plas et al. published in 2013 reported a positive result for the association between smoking and good functional outcome at 3 months in acute ischemic stroke patients who received intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). However, a major limitation of their meta-analysis was that the process of data synthesis was based on unadjusted data. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the association based on adjusted data and a larger sample size. Our meta-analysis suggested that smoking was not associated with good functional outcome after adjusting for covariates.

Abstract WP262: Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients With Infective Endocarditis

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mangala Gopal ◽  
Sushil Lakhani ◽  
Vivien Lee
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Medical Risk ◽  
Good Functional Outcome ◽  
Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Infective endocarditis (IE) is considered to be an absolute contraindication for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator treatment (IVtPA) in acute ischemic stroke. However during the hyperacute stroke evaluation, the exclusion of IE may be difficult. Methods: We reviewed consecutive patients hospitalized at our comprehensive stroke center from January 1, 2014 to March 31, 2019 with acute ischemic stroke who received IVtPA and identified patients who were diagnosed with infective endocarditis. Data was abstracted on demographics, medical history, clinical presentation, last known normal (LKN) time, initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), neuroimaging, culture results, and 90 day modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Good functional outcome was defined as mRS ≤ 2. Results: Among 1022 acute ischemic stroke patients who received IVtPA, 5 patients (0.5%) were ultimately diagnosed with IE. Among the 5 patients with IE, the mean age was 53.4 years (range, 25-74) and 3 (60%) were female. The majority, 4 (80%) were white. Medical risk factors for IE were present in 3 (60%) and included intravenous drug use (1) and dialysis (2). Initial NIHSS was 4.6 (range, 1 to 8). Fever was present on initial presentation in only 1 patient (102.7 F). All patients met criteria for IVtPA and there were no protocol violations. The mean time from LKN to IVtPA was 3.0 hours (range, 1.9 to 4.4). Vascular imaging showed MCA occlusion in 4 (80%) and no occlusion in 1 (20%). One patient underwent endovascular thrombectomy with Thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale 2A recanalization. Two patients (40%) developed hemorrhagic complications, including 1 patient who developed subarachnoid hemorrhage on Hospital Day #2 due to mycotic cerebral aneurysm. The blood culture results included MRSE (1), Streptococci viridans (2) and negative (2). TEE in all patients showed vegetations on the mitral valve. No patients had good functional outcome, and the mean 3 months mRS was 4.8 (range, 3 to 6). Conclusions: In a large series of acute ischemic stroke patients who received IVtPA, undiagnosed IE is rare (0.5%). Fever was not commonly present during initial evaluation. Despite affecting younger patients with initial mild deficits, patients with IE had poor functional outcomes.

scholarly journals Cerebral Microbleeds and Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Stroke: An Analysis of the WAKE-UP Randomized Clinical Trial

Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013055
Author(s):  
Ludwig Schlemm ◽  
Tim Bastian Braemswig ◽  
Florent Boutitie ◽  
Jan Vynckier ◽  
Märit Jensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Treatment Effect ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Search Trial

Background and ObjectivesCerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are common in acute ischemic stroke patients and are associated with increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) after intravenous thrombolysis. Whether CMBs modify the treatment effect of thrombolysis is unknown.MethodsWe performed a pre-specified analysis of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter WAKE-UP trial including patients with acute ischemic stroke with unknown time of symptom onset and DWI-FLAIR mismatch on MRI receiving alteplase or placebo. Patients were screened and enrolled between September 2012 and June 2017 (with final follow-up in September 2017). Patients were randomized to treatment with intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase at 0.9 mg / kg body weight or placebo. CMB status (presence, number, and distribution) was assessed after study completion by three raters blinded to clinical information following a standardized protocol. Outcome measures were excellent functional outcome at 90 days, defined by modified Rankin Scale score (mRS)≤1, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) according to NINDS trial criteria 22 to 36 hours after treatment.ResultsOf 503 patients enrolled in the WAKE-UP trial, 459 (91.3%; 288 [63%] men) were available for analysis; 98 (21.4%) had at least 1 CMB on baseline imaging; 45 (9.8%) had exactly 1 CMB, 37 (8.1%) had 2-4 CMBs, and 16 (3.5%) had ≥5 CMBs. Presence of CMBs was associated with a non-significant increased risk of symptomatic ICH (11.2% versus 4.2%; adjusted odds ratio 2.32 [95% CI 0.99-5.43]; P=.052), but had no effect on functional outcome at 90 days (mRS≤1: 45.8% versus 50.7%; adj. OR 0.99 [0.59-1.64]; P=.955). Patients receiving alteplase had better functional outcome (mRS≤1: 54.6% versus 44.6%, adj. OR 1.61 [1.07-2.43], P=.022) without evidence of heterogeneity in relation to CMB presence (P value of the interactive term .546). Results were similar for subpopulations with strictly lobar (presumed cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related) or non-strictly-lobar CMB distribution.DiscussionIn the randomized-controlled WAKE-UP trial, we saw no evidence of reduced treatment effect of alteplase in acute ischemic stroke patients with one or more CMBs. Additional studies are needed to determine the treatment effect of alteplase and its benefit-harm-ratio in patients with a larger number of CMBs.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01525290 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01525290); EudraCT number, 2011-005906-32 (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2011-005906-32/GB).Classification of EvidenceThis study provides Class II evidence that for patients with acute ischemic stroke with unknown time of onset and DWI-FLAIR mismatch who received IV alteplase, CMBs are not significantly associated with functional outcome at 90 days.

Abstract WP318: On Versus Off-Hour Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated via Telestroke- Impact on Long-Term Functional Outcome

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eyad Almallouhi ◽  
Tarun Girotra ◽  
Deepak Reddy ◽  
Sami Al Kasab ◽  
Nancy Turner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Patients

Abstract WP310: On versus Off-hour Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated via Telestroke: Impact on Long-term Functional Outcome

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eyad Almallouhi ◽  
Tarun Girotra ◽  
Deepak Reddy ◽  
Sami Al Kasab ◽  
Ellen Debenham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Patients

scholarly journals Management of acute ischemic stroke in patients with COVID-19 infection: Report of an international panel

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 540-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adnan I Qureshi ◽  
Foad Abd-Allah ◽  
Fahmi Al-Senani ◽  
Emrah Aytac ◽  
Afshin Borhani-Haghighi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
World Health ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
International Panel ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Tract Infections

Background and purpose On 11 March 2020, World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19 infection a pandemic. The risk of ischemic stroke may be higher in patients with COVID-19 infection similar to those with other respiratory tract infections. We present a comprehensive set of practice implications in a single document for clinicians caring for adult patients with acute ischemic stroke with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection. Methods The practice implications were prepared after review of data to reach the consensus among stroke experts from 18 countries. The writers used systematic literature reviews, reference to previously published stroke guidelines, personal files, and expert opinion to summarize existing evidence, indicate gaps in current knowledge, and when appropriate, formulate practice implications. All members of the writing group had opportunities to comment in writing on the practice implications and approved the final version of this document. Results This document with consensus is divided into 18 sections. A total of 41 conclusions and practice implications have been developed. The document includes practice implications for evaluation of stroke patients with caution for stroke team members to avoid COVID-19 exposure, during clinical evaluation and performance of imaging and laboratory procedures with special considerations of intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy in stroke patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection. Conclusions These practice implications with consensus based on the currently available evidence aim to guide clinicians caring for adult patients with acute ischemic stroke who are suspected of, or confirmed, with COVID-19 infection. Under certain circumstances, however, only limited evidence is available to support these practice implications, suggesting an urgent need for establishing procedures for the management of stroke patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection.

scholarly journals Acute reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke patients with unknown time of symptom onset or in extended time windows: an individualized approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628642110211
Author(s):  
Georgios Magoufis ◽  
Apostolos Safouris ◽  
Guy Raphaeli ◽  
Odysseas Kargiotis ◽  
Klearchos Psychogios ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Time Windows ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Treatment Algorithms ◽  
Late Presenters

Recent randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) have revolutionized acute ischemic stroke care by extending the use of intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular reperfusion therapies in time windows that have been originally considered futile or even unsafe. Both systemic and endovascular reperfusion therapies have been shown to improve outcome in patients with wake-up strokes or symptom onset beyond 4.5 h for intravenous thrombolysis and beyond 6 h for endovascular treatment; however, they require advanced neuroimaging to select stroke patients safely. Experts have proposed simpler imaging algorithms but high-quality data on safety and efficacy are currently missing. RCTs used diverse imaging and clinical inclusion criteria for patient selection during the dawn of this novel stroke treatment paradigm. After taking into consideration the dismal prognosis of nonrecanalized ischemic stroke patients and the substantial clinical benefit of reperfusion therapies in selected late presenters, we propose rescue reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke patients not fulfilling all clinical and imaging inclusion criteria as an option in a subgroup of patients with clinical and radiological profiles suggesting low risk for complications, notably hemorrhagic transformation as well as local or remote parenchymal hemorrhage. Incorporating new data to treatment algorithms may seem perplexing to stroke physicians, since treatment and imaging capabilities of each stroke center may dictate diverse treatment pathways. This narrative review will summarize current data that will assist clinicians in the selection of those late presenters that will most likely benefit from acute reperfusion therapies. Different treatment algorithms are provided according to available neuroimaging and endovascular treatment capabilities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document