scholarly journals “You Leave There Feeling Part of Something”: A Qualitative Study of Hospitalized COPD Patients’ Perceptions of Pulmonary Rehabilitation

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 15 ◽  
pp. 575-583
Author(s):  
Kerry A Spitzer ◽  
Mihaela Stefan ◽  
Aubri Drake ◽  
Quinn Pack ◽  
Tara Lagu ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronika Williams ◽  
Anne Bruton ◽  
Caroline Ellis-Hill ◽  
Kathryn McPherson

Author(s):  
Jose L. Gonzalez-Montesinos ◽  
Jorge R. Fernandez-Santos ◽  
Carmen Vaz-Pardal ◽  
Jesus G. Ponce-Gonzalez ◽  
Alberto Marin-Galindo ◽  
...  

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients are characterised for presenting dyspnea, which reduces their physical capacity and tolerance to physical exercise. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of adding a Feel-Breathe (FB) device for inspiratory muscle training (IMT) to an 8-week pulmonary rehabilitation programme. Twenty patients were randomised into three groups: breathing with FB (FBG), oronasal breathing without FB (ONBG) and control group (CG). FBG and ONBG carried out the same training programme with resistance, strength and respiratory exercises for 8 weeks. CG did not perform any pulmonary rehabilitation programme. Regarding intra group differences in the value obtained in the post-training test at the time when the maximum value in the pre-training test was obtained (PostPRE), FBG obtained lower values in oxygen consumption (VO2, mean = −435.6 mL/min, Bayes Factor (BF10) > 100), minute ventilation (VE, −8.5 L/min, BF10 = 25), respiratory rate (RR, −3.3 breaths/min, BF10 = 2), heart rate (HR, −13.7 beats/min, BF10 > 100) and carbon dioxide production (VCO2, −183.0 L/min, BF10 = 50), and a greater value in expiratory time (Tex, 0.22 s, BF10 = 12.5). At the maximum value recorded in the post-training test (PostFINAL), FBG showed higher values in the total time of the test (Tt, 4.3 min, BF10 = 50) and respiratory exchange rate (RER, 0.05, BF10 = 1.3). Regarding inter group differences at PrePOST, FBG obtained a greater negative increment than ONBG in the ventilatory equivalent of CO2 (EqCO2, −3.8 L/min, BF10 = 1.1) and compared to CG in VE (−8.3 L/min, BF10 = 3.6), VCO2 (−215.9 L/min, BF10 = 3.0), EqCO2 (−3.7 L/min, BF10 = 1.1) and HR (−12.9 beats/min, BF10 = 3.4). FBG also showed a greater PrePOST positive increment in Tex (0.21 s, BF10 = 1.4) with respect to CG. At PreFINAL, FBG presented a greater positive increment compared to CG in Tt (4.4 min, BF10 = 3.2) and negative in VE/VCO2 intercept (−4.7, BF10 = 1.1). The use of FB added to a pulmonary rehabilitation programme in COPD patients could improve tolerance in the incremental exercise test and energy efficiency. However, there is only a statically significant difference between FBG and ONBG in EqCO2. Therefore, more studies are necessary to reach a definitive conclusion about including FB in a pulmonary rehabilitation programme.


1988 ◽  
Vol 138 (6) ◽  
pp. 1519-1523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Foster ◽  
Deborah Lopez ◽  
Henry M. Thomas

Thorax ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 66 (Suppl 4) ◽  
pp. A127-A128
Author(s):  
S. E. Roberts ◽  
G. Kettle ◽  
S. Rogers ◽  
A. Segal ◽  
S. Purcell ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 106678
Author(s):  
Yara Al Chikhanie ◽  
Sébastien Bailly ◽  
Ines Amroussia ◽  
Daniel Veale ◽  
Frédéric Hérengt ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aroub Lahham ◽  
Christine F McDonald ◽  
Ajay Mahal ◽  
Annemarie L Lee ◽  
Catherine J Hill ◽  
...  

This study aimed to document the perspective of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who underwent home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HBPR) in a clinical trial. In this qualitative study, open-ended questions explored participants’ views regarding HBPR. Thirteen semi-structured interviews were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. Major themes from interviews included the positive impact of HBPR on physical fitness, breathing and mood. Participants valued the flexibility and convenience of the programme. Participants also highlighted the importance of social support received, both from the physiotherapist over the phone and from family and friends who encouraged their participation. Reported challenges were difficulties in initiating exercise, lack of variety in training and physical incapability. While most participants supported the home setting, one participant would have preferred receiving supervised exercise training at the hospital. Participants also reported that HBPR had helped establish an exercise routine and improved their disease management. This study suggests that people with COPD valued the convenience of HBPR, experienced positive impacts on physical fitness and symptoms and felt supported by their community and programme staff. This highly structured HBPR model may be acceptable to some people with COPD as an alternative to centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document