scholarly journals Real-World Patterns of Utilization and Costs Associated with Second-Generation Oral Antipsychotic Medication for the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder: A Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 17 ◽  
pp. 515-531
Author(s):  
Michael J Doane ◽  
Kristine Ogden ◽  
Leona Bessonova ◽  
Amy K O'Sullivan ◽  
Mauricio Tohen
2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 277-277
Author(s):  
P.T. Dineen ◽  
A.L. Malizia

This is a literature review of the evidence for pharmacological treatment for bipolar disorder in children and adolescents. The review covers drugs that have controlled studies and is divided into older, classical antimanic drugs and the newer mood-stabliser/antipsychotic drugs. The drugs that have had controlled studies are aripiprazole, lithium, olanzapine, oxcarbazepine, quetiapine, risperidone, topiramate, valproate/divalproex drugs and ziprasidone. Carbamazepine, lamotrigine and nefazodone (which is included for completion) were not found to have any evidence from controlled studies. Of the 9 drugs that have evidence, it was found that the newer second-generation antipsychotics had better evidence for efficacy for management of acute mania in children and adolescents: aripiprazole, risperidone, quetiapine and olanzapine. Classical antimanic agents such as lithium and valproate-based drugs had limited evidence.


2009 ◽  
Vol 195 (S52) ◽  
pp. s1-s4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxine X. Patel ◽  
Mark Taylor ◽  
Anthony S. David

SummaryLong-acting injections of antipsychotic medication (or depots) were developed specifically to promote treatment adherence and are a valuable option for maintenance medication in psychotic illnesses. Approximately 40–60% of patients with schizophrenia are partially or totally non-adherent to their antipsychotic regimen, but only 30% or less are prescribed a long-acting injection. The use of such injections has declined in recent years after the introduction of second-generation (atypical) oral antipsychotic drugs. Research shows that possible reasons for this decline include concerns that may be based on suboptimal knowledge, as well as an erroneous assumption that one's own patient group is more adherent than those of one's colleagues. Research on attitudes has also revealed that psychiatrists feel that long-acting injections have an ‘image’ problem. This editorial addresses the gaps in knowledge and behaviour associated with possible underutilisation of these formulations, highlighting the role of stigma and the need for more research.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Brnabic ◽  
Lisa M. Hess

Abstract Background Machine learning is a broad term encompassing a number of methods that allow the investigator to learn from the data. These methods may permit large real-world databases to be more rapidly translated to applications to inform patient-provider decision making. Methods This systematic literature review was conducted to identify published observational research of employed machine learning to inform decision making at the patient-provider level. The search strategy was implemented and studies meeting eligibility criteria were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Relevant data related to study design, statistical methods and strengths and limitations were identified; study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Luo checklist. Results A total of 34 publications from January 2014 to September 2020 were identified and evaluated for this review. There were diverse methods, statistical packages and approaches used across identified studies. The most common methods included decision tree and random forest approaches. Most studies applied internal validation but only two conducted external validation. Most studies utilized one algorithm, and only eight studies applied multiple machine learning algorithms to the data. Seven items on the Luo checklist failed to be met by more than 50% of published studies. Conclusions A wide variety of approaches, algorithms, statistical software, and validation strategies were employed in the application of machine learning methods to inform patient-provider decision making. There is a need to ensure that multiple machine learning approaches are used, the model selection strategy is clearly defined, and both internal and external validation are necessary to be sure that decisions for patient care are being made with the highest quality evidence. Future work should routinely employ ensemble methods incorporating multiple machine learning algorithms.


2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S366-S367
Author(s):  
Mallik Greene ◽  
Tingjian Yan ◽  
Eunice Chang ◽  
Ann Hartry ◽  
Jennifer Munday ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document