<p>Multivariate analysis of poor outcome after anterior surgery in multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients with heterotopic ossification and preoperative kyphotic alignment</p>

OBJECTIVEThe study of pediatric arteriovenous malformations (pAVMs) is complicated by the rarity of the entity. Treatment choice has often been affected by the availability of different modalities and the experience of the providers present. The University of Pittsburgh experience of multimodality treatment of pAVMs is presented.METHODSThe authors conducted a retrospective cohort study examining 212 patients with pAVM presenting to the University of Pittsburgh between 1988 and 2018, during which patients had access to surgical, endovascular, and radiosurgical options. Univariate analysis was performed comparing good and poor outcomes. A poor outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≥ 3. Multivariate analysis via logistic regression was performed on appropriate variables with a p value of ≤ 0.2. Seventy-five percent of the cohort had at least 3 years of follow-up.RESULTSFive patients (2.4%) did not receive any intervention, 131 (61.8%) had GKRS alone, 14 (6.6%) had craniotomies alone, and 2 (0.9%) had embolization alone. Twenty-two (10.4%) had embolization and Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS); 20 (9.4%) had craniotomies and GKRS; 8 (3.8%) had embolization and craniotomies; and 10 (4.7%) had embolization, craniotomies, and GKRS. Thirty-one patients (14.6%) were found to have poor outcome on follow-up. The multivariate analysis performed in patients with poor outcomes was notable for associations with no treatment (OR 18.9, p = 0.02), hemorrhage requiring craniotomy for decompression alone (OR 6, p = 0.03), preoperative mRS score (OR 2.1, p = 0.004), and Spetzler-Martin score (OR 1.8, p = 0.0005). The mean follow-up was 79.7 ± 62.1 months. The confirmed radiographic obliteration rate was 79.4% and there were 5 recurrences found on average 9.5 years after treatment.CONCLUSIONSHigh rates of long-term functional independence (mRS score of ≤ 2) can be achieved with comprehensive multimodality treatment of pAVMs. At this center there was no difference in outcome based on treatment choice when accounting for factors such as Spetzler-Martin grade and presenting morbidity. Recurrences are rare but frequently occur years after treatment, emphasizing the need for long-term screening after obliteration.

Download Full-text

Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion (ACAF) technique for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy with spinal stenosis (MCSMSS): a retrospective study of 45 cases

10.21203/rs.2.12543/v1 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Xi Luo ◽

Kaiqiang Sun ◽

Jingchuan Sun ◽

Shunmin Wang ◽

Yuan Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Spinal Stenosis ◽

Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy ◽

Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽

Neck Disability Index ◽

Operation Time ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Csf Leakage ◽

One Year ◽

Neck Disability ◽

Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Abstract Background To investigate the clinical effect of anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) technique for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy with spinal stenosis (MCSMSS), and compare ACAF with hybrid decompression fixation (HDF). Methods A retrospective analysis of 85 cases with MCSMSS was carried out. 45 patients were treated with ACAF, while 40 patients were treated with HDF. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative complications, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, Computed Tomography (CT) transverse measurement, cervical curvature and Kang's grade were compared between two groups. Results The patients were followed up for 12 to 17 months. Compared with HDF, ACAF group achieved better decompression according to CT measurement and Kang’s grade (P < 0.05), and recovered to a greater cervical Cobb’s angle (P < 0.05). However, JOA score and NDI index showed no significant difference one year after surgery (P＞0.05). Additionally, ACAF presented longer operation time and greater intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.05). As to complications, ACAF developed less incidences of cerebrospinal fluid examination (CSF) leakage, neurologic deterioration, epidural hematoma and C5 palsy by comparing with HDF. Conclusions ACAF is an effective method for the treatment of MCSMSS. Compared with HDF, ACAF has the advantages of significant decompression, increasing cervical curvature, and reducing the incidences of complications.

Download Full-text