Design and development of patient-specific prosthetic socket for lower limb amputation

In this prospective study, the overall treatment and outcome of patients that underwent major lower limb amputation in a defined population is described. The study was performed over a five year period in the Health Care District of North-East Skåne, Sweden. Some 190 patients, permanent inhabitants of the Health Care District, underwent major lower limb amputation. Sixteen (16) of these patients had amputations before the study started and went through late second leg amputation during the period. One hundred and seventy four (174) patients had primary major amputation. Seventy nine (79) were men and 95 were women, with a median age of 81. The re-amputation rate was 17% although the primary knee preservation ratio was as high as 3.0:1. Rigid dressing was the standard method following trans-tibial amputation and was used for 5–7 days. ICEROSS∗ silicone liner was used for compression therapy in 90% of all cases that resulted in delivery of a prosthesis. Prostheses were delivered to 43% of all patients with primary amputations. These patients spent a median of 13 days at the orthopaedic clinic, 55 days at the rehabilitation unit. Pressure casting was used as a standard method in the production of the prosthetic socket. ICEX∗ carbon-fibre socket was used in 52%. New procedures, treatments and techniques were introduced, standardised and evaluated whilst the routines in the hospital were reorganised. In this way, a system has been implemented that better guarantees the outcome of the whole procedure and the service received by this category of patients.

Download Full-text

Metric Charcteristics of Sit-to-stand Tests in Patients After Lower-limb Amputation

Case Medical Research ◽

10.31525/ct1-nct04293237 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Keyword(s):

Lower Limb ◽

Lower Limb Amputation ◽

Limb Amputation ◽

Sit To Stand

Download Full-text

Prostheses and orthoses. Factors to be considered when specifying a prosthesis for a person who has had a lower limb amputation

10.3403/30178636 ◽

2009 ◽

Keyword(s):

Lower Limb ◽

Lower Limb Amputation ◽

Limb Amputation

Download Full-text

Prostheses and orthoses. Factors to be included when describing physical activity of a person who has had a lower limb amputation(s) or who has a deficiency of a lower limb segment(s) present at birth

10.3403/30178633u ◽

2015 ◽

Keyword(s):

Physical Activity ◽

Lower Limb ◽

Lower Limb Amputation ◽

Limb Amputation ◽

Limb Segment

Download Full-text

Prostheses and orthoses. Factors to be included when describing physical activity of a person who has had a lower limb amputation(s) or who has a deficiency of a lower limb segment(s) present at birth

10.3403/30178633 ◽

2009 ◽

Keyword(s):

Physical Activity ◽

Lower Limb ◽

Lower Limb Amputation ◽

Limb Amputation ◽

Limb Segment

Download Full-text

P90 PERCEIVE: PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcome following major lower limb amputation - a collaboratIVE study

BJS Open ◽

10.1093/bjsopen/zrab032.089 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

B Gwilym ◽

C Waldron ◽

E Thomas-Jones ◽

P Pallmann ◽

R Preece ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Prediction ◽

Lower Limb ◽

Health Care Professionals ◽

Healthcare Professionals ◽

Demographic Data ◽

Collaborative Study ◽

Lower Limb Amputation ◽

Research Network ◽

Limb Amputation ◽

Prediction Tools

Abstract Introduction Major Lower Limb Amputation (MLLA) is a life changing event with significant morbidity and mortality. Inaccurate risk prediction can lead to poor decision making, resulting in delay to definitive surgery, or undertaking amputation when not in the patient’s best interest. We aim to answer: In adult patients undergoing MLLA for chronic limb threatening ischaemia or diabetes, how accurately do health care professionals prospectively predict outcomes after MLLA, and how does this compare to existing prediction tools? Methods A multicentre prospective observational cohort study is being delivered through the Vascular and Endovascular Research Network. Dissemination was via an existing network of contacts and social media. Consecutive data will be collected for seven months from site launch date, including demographic data and pre-operative outcome predictions from surgeons, anaesthetists, and allied healthcare professionals. Follow-up data will comprise 30-day (mortality, morbidity, MLLA revision, surgical site infection, and blood transfusion) and 1-year (mortality, MLLA revision and ambulation). The accuracy of surgeons’ predictions will be evaluated and compared to pre-existing risk prediction scoring tools. Results PERCEIVE launched on 01/10/2020 with 23 centres (16 UK, 7 international) registered to collect data. 50 other centres (27 UK, 23 international) have expressed interest/are pursuing local audit/ethical approval. We aim to collect data on clinicians estimate of outcomes for over 500 patients. Discussion This study will utilise a trainee research network to provide data on the accuracy of healthcare professionals’ predictions of outcomes following MLLA and compare this to the utility of existing prediction tools in this patient cohort.

Download Full-text