scholarly journals Interplay between Stemness and Inflammatory Modulators in Oral Epithelial Dysplasia

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 2325-2336
Author(s):  
Shaimaa Ghazy ◽  
Nermeen Afifi
Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline McCarthy ◽  
Joseph Sacco ◽  
Stefano Fedele ◽  
Michael Ho ◽  
Stephen Porter ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Sodium valproate (VPA) has been associated with a reduced risk of head and neck cancer development. The potential protective mechanism of action is believed to be via inhibition of histone deacetylase and subsequent epigenetic reprogramming. SAVER is a phase IIb open-label, randomised control trial of VPA as a chemopreventive agent in patients with high-risk oral epithelial dysplasia (OED). The aim of the trial is to gather preliminary evidence of the clinical and biological effects of VPA upon OED and assess the feasibility and acceptability of such a trial, with a view to inform a future definitive phase III study. Methods One hundred and ten patients with high-risk OED will be recruited from up to 10 secondary care sites in the UK and randomised into either VPA or observation only for 4 months. Women of childbearing potential will be excluded due to the teratogenic properties of VPA. Tissue and blood samples will be collected prior to randomisation and on the last day of the intervention/observation-only period (end of 4 months). Clinical measurement and additional safety bloods will be taken at multiple time points during the trial. The primary outcome will be a composite, surrogate endpoint of change in lesion size, change in grade of dysplasia and change in LOH profile at 8 key microsatellite regions. Feasibility outcomes will include recruitment targets, compliance with the study protocol and adverse effects. A qualitative sub-study will explore patient experience and perception of the trial. Discussion The current management options for patients with high-risk OED are limited and mostly include surgical resection and clinical surveillance. However, there remains little evidence whether surgery can effectively lead to a notable reduction in the risk of oral cancer development. Similarly, surveillance is associated with concerns regarding delayed diagnosis of OED progressing to malignancy. The SAVER trial provides an opportunity to investigate the effects of a repurposed, inexpensive and well-tolerated medication as a potential chemopreventive strategy for patients with high-risk OED. The clinical and biological findings of SAVER will inform the appropriateness, design and feasibility of a definitive phase III trial. Trial registration The trial is registered with the European Clinical Trials Database (Eudra-CT 2018-000197-30). (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12448611). The trial was prospectively registered on 24/04/2018.


2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 300-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brothwell D. J ◽  
Lewis D. W ◽  
Bradley G ◽  
Leong I ◽  
Jordan R. C. K ◽  
...  

Oral Diseases ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bubacar Embaló ◽  
Andressa Fernanda Paza Miguel ◽  
Andrea Cristina Konrath ◽  
Filipe Modolo ◽  
Elena Riet Correa Rivero

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 738
Author(s):  
KenniyanKumar Srichinthu ◽  
GS Kumar ◽  
Harikrishnan Prasad ◽  
Muthusamy Rajmohan ◽  
Krishnamurthy Anuthama ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
pp. 106689692110701
Author(s):  
Zaid H. Khoury ◽  
Mohamed Sultan ◽  
Ahmed S. Sultan

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to provide a robust qualitative and quantitative analysis of the different systems used to assess the grade of oral epithelial dysplasia (OED). This study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyzes (PRISMA) statement. Six electronic databases were searched for primary research published over the past four decades. Overall quality and level of evidence were based on the Johns Hopkins Research Evidence Appraisal Tool, while evidence of heterogeneity was determined by the Q-statistic and I^2 statistic. Evidence of publication bias was determined using Egger's regression and the Rank correlation tests. A total of 170 records were identified. Only 9 primary research articles were included in the qualitative systematic review. Four studies (4/9) were included in the final quantitative meta-analysis. The grading systems analyzed included the WHO, binary, Ljubljana, Smith and Pindborg, Brothwell, and the oral intraepithelial neoplasia. The results demonstrate the binary system to be superior to the WHO system in grading OED, by providing better inter-observer agreement, however, the substantial error among the inter-observer κ values analyzed indicates the significance of this finding to be of minimal impact. Lack of reliable reproducibility of the grading systems and lack of common effect size (heterogeneity analysis) were noted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document