scholarly journals Producción científica sobre maloclusión en relación con ortodoncia y ortopedia. Análisis de indicadores bibliométricos

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-81
Author(s):  
Gustavo Jaimes-Monroy ◽  
Diana Marcela Coral Chamorro ◽  
Marilyn Carolina Padilla Sierra ◽  
Laura Andrea Mogollón Romero
Keyword(s):  
Dentofacial Orthopedics

Introducción y objetivo: El tratamiento temprano de las maloclusiones se ha convertido en un tema polémico entre los ortodoncistas, que se debaten en su uso. El propósito del presente artículo es indagar en la producción científica en los últimos cinco años sobre el tema de maloclusiones, y dentro de este campo en la ortopedia como aproximación al tratamiento temprano. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio de indicadores bibliométricos con análisis temporal para cinco años. Se revisaron las variables de producción anual de artículos, revistas, autores, cooperación y análisis de citas. Resultados: El año de mayor producción fue 2017 tanto para el tema de maloclusión en ortopedia como el de ortodoncia. El autor más citado en el tema de maloclusión en ortodoncia fue Janson Guilherme con 27 publicaciones y 65 citas. En el tema de maloclusión y ortopedia fue Franchi Lorenzo con 18 publicaciones y 88 citas; la revista con mayor cantidad de artículos es la American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Estados Unidos, Italia y Brasil son los países con más divulgaciones asociadas a estos temas. Conclusiones: Existe una producción en aumento anual de las temáticas de maloclusión y ortodoncia, mientras que la temática de maloclusión y ortopedia cuenta con una producción menor.

scholarly journals Serum DHEA-S levels could be used as a comparable diagnostic test to assess the pubertal growth spurt in dentofacial orthopedics

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Anusuya ◽  
Amit Nagar ◽  
Pradeep Tandon ◽  
G. K. Singh ◽  
Gyan Prakash Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Test ◽  
Growth Spurt ◽  
Pubertal Growth Spurt ◽  
Pubertal Growth ◽  
Dentofacial Orthopedics

scholarly journals Predisposição genética, hereditariedade e reabsorções radiculares em Ortodontia: cuidados com interpretações precipitadas: uma análise crítica do trabalho de Al-Qawasmi et al

2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Consolaro ◽  
Maria Fernanda Martins-Ortiz
Keyword(s):  
Dentofacial Orthopedics

O trabalho de Al-Qawasmi et al.¹, publicado em março de 2003 pelo American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, procurou estabelecer uma predisposição genética para justificar as reabsorções dentárias em Ortodontia, mas apresentou algumas limitações metodológicas e equívocos na interpretação de seus resultados. A análise criteriosa deste artigo ressalta que, na maioria, estas limitações foram mencionadas e reconhecidas pelos autores na discussão do trabalho, mas o seu resumo e título foram muito taxativos e conclusivos. A linguagem de estudos genéticos nem sempre é familiar a todos os clínicos e isto também requer uma análise esclarecedora à luz de uma visão mais aplicada ao cotidiano ortodôntico. Referenciar ou citar este trabalho de Al-Qawasmi et al.¹, para afirmar de forma taxativa que se demonstrou a natureza hereditária das reabsorções dentárias em Ortodontia, pode denotar falta de conhecimento sobre o assunto ou uma leitura ou compreensão apenas do seu título. Ou ainda, a citação deste trabalho como prova definitiva de associação entre hereditariedade e reabsorções dentárias em Ortodontia pode traduzir também o desejo de excluir da prática clínica a responsabilidade de planejar de forma individualizada e detalhada cada tratamento com base no conhecimento das possibilidades e limitações técnicas oferecidas pela ciência ortodôntica, bem como nas suas bases biológicas, por exemplo, valorizando a morfologia radicular e da crista óssea alveolar e o papel dos cementoblastos na proteção da superfície radicular.

Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation

1985 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 273-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Pancherz ◽  
Urban Hägg
Keyword(s):  
Dentofacial Orthopedics

scholarly journals Agenesis of maxillary lateral incisor in an Angle Class II, Division 1 malocclusion patient

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 108-117
Author(s):  
Guilherme Thiesen
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Lateral Incisor ◽  
Occlusal Plane ◽  
Angle Class Ii ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Angle Class ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Maxillary Lateral Incisor ◽  
Dentofacial Orthopedics ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

The present case report describes the orthodontic treatment of a patient with agenesis of maxillary left lateral incisor and Angle Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. The patient also presented with maxillary midline deviation and inclination of the occlusal plane in the anterior region. Treatment objectives were: correction of sagittal relationship between the maxilla and the mandible; correction of midline deviation, so as to cause maxillary and mandibular midlines to coincide; correction of overbite and leveling of the occlusal plane, so as to create ideal conditions for esthetic rehabilitation of anterior teeth. This case was presented to the Brazilian Board of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (BBO) as a requirement for the title of certified by the BBO.

scholarly journals Prevalence of White Spot Lesion during Orthodontic Treatment with Fixed Appliance

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 40-42
Author(s):  
Md Ali Kawsar ◽  
Md Nurul Islam ◽  
Moutithi Sen ◽  
Subodh Chandra Chakraborty ◽  
Muhammad Tanvir Siddiqui
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
White Spot ◽  
White Spot Lesion ◽  
White Spot Lesions ◽  
Orthodontic Appliance ◽  
Fixed Appliance ◽  
Group 12 ◽  
Dentofacial Orthopedics

Background: White spot lesions (enamel demineralization) is one of the most common and a significant risk associated with orthodontic treatment. Objective: To determine the prevalence of white spot lesion during fixed orthodontic treatment. Method: This prospective observational study and was conducted in the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics from January 2016 to December 2017 over a period of two years. Patients with fixed orthodontic appliance age between 12-30 years of both sex attended for follow up were included in this study. After taking written consent, a questionnaire included socio-demographic data, clinical and outcome variables including routine clinical photographs to examine WSL were filled up for each patient. Routine clinical photographs to examine WSL were taken after 6 months and 12 months of fixing orthodontics appliance. Qualitative data were expressed as frequency distribution and percentage. Results: Maximum patients were in age group 12 – 16 years and prevalence of WSL was also sought maximum in this group. Out of 36 cases with WSL, 14 (38.9%) were male and 22 (61.1%) were female. Prevalence of WSL after six month of fixing orthodontic appliance was 21.8% and 26.1% after 12 months. Prevalence of WSL after six month of fixing orthodontic appliance in male was 26.4% & in female was 19.6% and after 12 month of fixing orthodontic appliance it was 30.2% in male and 24.1% in female. After six months of fixing orthodontic appliance 1-3 WSLs was found in 17.0% cases and ≥ 4 WSLs in 4.8% cases. After twelve months of fixing orthodontic appliance 1-3 WSLs was found in 19.4% cases and ≥ 4 WSLs in 6.7% cases. Maximum WSL was found in maxillary incisors. Conclusion: This study showed that 21.8% of the study subjects developed white spot lesions during orthodontic procedure and incisors were the most common affected teeth. Update Dent. Coll. j: 2019; 9 (2): 40-42

Validation of the Vertical Facial Growth Screening Test

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 1187-1193
Author(s):  
Christian Calvo-Henriquez ◽  
Silvia Martins-Neves ◽  
Gabriel Martinez-Capoccioni ◽  
Daniela Neves-Leal ◽  
Alberto Ruano-Ravina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screening Test ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Facial Growth ◽  
The Face ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Low Sensitivity ◽  
Dentofacial Orthopedics ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background. Vertical facial growth has a high prevalence. Nonspecialized professionals have shown low sensitivity to identify patients at risk. In the face of this difficulty, we designed and validated a screening checklist for vertical facial growth. Methods. A multidisciplinary team of 5 members developed the Vertical Facial Growth Screening Test. A sample of 160 evaluations was obtained. We consider as the gold standard the evaluation of 2 specialists in dentofacial orthopedics. Results. Consistency measured with Cronbach α was .675 for 10 items. Test-retest reliability was .956. The interobserver concordance was .886. The receiver operating characteristic curve has .987 area under the curve. Conclusion. This is the first study to design and validate a screening checklist for vertical facial growth for nonexpert evaluators. We think that given its good performance, ease of use, inexpensiveness, and availability, the test could be useful for nontrained professionals dealing with children.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document